X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Leading article

Politics of retreat

20 October 2012

9:00 AM

20 October 2012

9:00 AM

The closure of Britain’s consulate in Basra marks the end of an inglorious episode in our military history. This ought to have been the city where Britain would forever be seen as the liberator, given that it was our troops who supplanted Saddam Hussein’s forces almost ten years ago. Instead, Basra’s darkest moments came after the invasion: death squads moved in to fill the security vacuum Britain left behind. Our government failed to commit enough resources to make Basra safe. The massacres, executions and tortures that followed Britain’s withdrawal were brought to an end only when the Iraqi army reinvaded Basra. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were so determined to present a narrative of success that they refused to admit to any setback.

The untold scandal of Iraq is not of the lies that took us in, but the lies told to get us out. Britain eventually justified withdrawal by pretending we were officially handing over to a peaceful Iraqi government and a brand new police force. In fact, we were scarpering from a city we had long ago handed over unofficially to Muqtada al-Sadr’s private army. We had just 200 troops patrolling a city of 1.3 million, with predictable results. As circumstances in other parts of the country showed, such an outcome was not inevitable — it was, effectively, a choice. As our enemies looked on with glee, our allies watched in horror.

As David Cameron prepares a retreat from Afghanistan, he faces the same nightmare. There can be no doubt over the nature of the Taleban regime to whom we would be passing control. A Pakistani girl from the Swat Valley lies in the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, making good progress after doctors removed the bullet that was put in her head by the Taleban as punishment for writing an online diary about girls’ education for the BBC. For years, we were told about how Britain’s legacy would be good schools and a stable country. Now, it seems the country is so dangerous we will not dare to evacuate our own military hardware.

[Alt-Text]


Ignoring the lesson of Basra makes political sense. But it does nothing to help our leaders learn how to use force in an increasingly dangerous world. Although we seem able to have an inquiry into nearly everything else in the country, from the West Coast Mainline to a minister swearing at a policeman, there is little willingness to investigate our failure in Basra. Yet with British troops now embroiled in another increasingly futile conflict in Helmand, regularly dying in a mission that long ago lost its purpose, the failure to learn has become not merely theoretical but visible. And it costs lives.

Like his predecessors, Mr Cameron repeats the refrains. He continues — rightly — to laud our armed forces. Most Wednesdays, he has to rise in the House of Commons to issue more condolences to the families of our servicemen and women. Doubtless he, like many others, fears any statement or strategy that implies our young men and women have died in vain. But it is becoming harder than ever to escape this conclusion.

Our troops are all due to leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014. As in Basra, the military commanders are understandably intent on losing as few British soldiers as possible. This is a perfectly noble aim, but it raises serious questions about what we are doing there at all. If the troops are not engaged in worthwhile fighting, why drag it out till 2014? If we have given up on pacifying Helmand, and have resigned ourselves to some kind of civil war afterwards — while Hamid Karzai is left to defend Fortress Kabul — then what is the wider objective?

As we retreat from Afghanistan, Cameron might be tempted to repeat the Blair deception: that we are leaving a peaceful country, having handed over to Afghans as if this were an end in itself. But as with Basra, it will be a lie it does no good to repeat. The politics of retreat may be back, but Cameron owes it to our country and our armed forces to do better than his predecessor. He needs to be honest about why we are going, why we are staying for another 18 months, and what we are in fact going to leave behind.

It does not dishonour the dead to point out that none of the tangible things which have been created in the way of Afghan civil society will long survive the withdrawal of 2014. We never had the means or the patience. In the end, the old Taleban saying proved right: we had the watches, they had the time. Nation-building may be a mission that can be embarked on by nations at the height of their powers. We are currently some way down the road from there.

Britain is, and can yet remain, a force for good in the world. But we owe it to ourselves and to our allies to admit the chasm that has opened between our diminished capabilities, and the aspirations to which our politicians give voice.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close