X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Letters

Letters

1 December 2012

9:00 AM

1 December 2012

9:00 AM

Too busy for terrorism

Sir: The Islamisation of countries surrounding Israel may not necessarily constitute an increased threat to the Jewish state (‘Israel under siege’, 24 November).
The reluctance of Hezbollah to open a second front in Israel’s north in the past weeks may be due to the recent economic recovery of south Lebanon following massive infrastructure destruction extending up to south Beirut in the 2006 war with Israel, largely funded by Iran.
Similar economic growth and prosperity in the West Bank may well be responsible for the virtual absence of any recent anti-Israel violence. (A recent television report on West Bank high schools showed many kids wearing orthodontic braces — a sure contra-indication to becoming a suicide bomber.)

Hopefully once the citizens of Gaza have recovered from this onslaught and have rebuilt their city, they will appreciate the benefits of free enterprise and economic prosperity without further bloodshed.
Perhaps the greatest long-term threat to Israel’s identity may be a peaceful economic and political subsumption into a greater Israel-Palestinian conurbation.

Ian Bernadt
West Perth, Western Australia

Street dealers

Sir: Hugo Rifkind is commendably bold to forecast (24 November) that in ten years’ time we will all be buying cannabis from the off-licence. About the cannabis he is almost certainly right. But what makes him think there will still be any off-licences?
Sam Taplin
London W11

Stiff upper lip, Toby

Sir: Toby Young (24 November) should continue in his efforts to grow an iconic moustache. My grandmother, born in 1897, told me on my 21st birthday in 1968 that ‘kissing a man without a moustache is like having strawberries without cream’.

I have had my well-groomed moustache since then and know that her advice was sound.
Francis Osborn
Weymouth

Cavalier treatment

[Alt-Text]


Sir: I was surprised by Blair Worden’s view of my biography of Henry Jermyn, The King’s Henchman (Books, 17 November), as largely ‘fictional embroidery’. He calls ‘implausible’, for example, my statement that Jermyn was ‘effectively in charge’ in 1641.

I can but cite the evidence to Professor Worden. Sir John Temple, writing to the Earl of Leicester, says Jermyn ‘is now so great with the King as he and the Queen are locked up alone with him many howers together’. He further writes that all appointments were made not by the King, but by the Queen who was ‘guided by Jermyn and a strange interest hath he gotten with the King’. These are merely two of a succession of such statements.

I sought out every possible mention of Jermyn in original sources and identify them in over 7,000 words of endnotes. To call these ‘scarce’ is, well, ‘cavalier’.
Anthony Adolph
By email

Licensing acts

Sir: In response to Charles Moore (Notes, 17 November), I wanted to clarify the way TV Licensing communicates with households that don’t require a licence.

When we are informed a property doesn’t need a TV licence, we update our records to reflect this. Letters to the address are stopped for around two years.  A visit may also take place to verify the situation. We will then get in touch again to check circumstances haven’t changed, for example that the occupants haven’t moved house. We ask that if a householder’s circumstances have not changed, they contact us to let us know that they still do not need a licence. We do our best not to trouble genuine non-viewers, and people can notify us via a simple declaration form on our website or by phone. If we don’t hear from the householder then we won’t be aware that a licence isn’t required and the tone of the letters will become stronger, as we need to inform people of the risks of prosecution if they require a licence and don’t have one.
Claire Wotherspoon
TV Licensing

Empty cellar

Sir: I am writing to say that contrary to Steerpike’s article (24 November), Lord McAlpine sold his wine collection in 1990 and he does not drink wine because he is diabetic. He has also not been a sitting member of the House of Lords for the last three years.
James Henderson
Chief executive, Pelham Bell Pottinger
London WC1

Chancellor and the church

Sir: Alexander Chancellor is the best columnist of his generation, I think, and I’m very pleased he is now a weekly contributor to your pages. His column on the Church of England (17 November) was typically astute. Yet when he says that his visits to church end ‘more often than not’ in ‘great disappointment’, I can’t help wondering if he has missed the point about religious belief. Disappointment is what it’s all about – in this life, at least. 
David Evans
Wiltshire

Sir: Concerning Alexander Chancellor’s plea for the incoming Archbishop of Canterbury not to forget ‘those of us who have the religious temperament but not the faith’, I recently overheard the following at dinner: ‘Religious? God, no, not me — I’m C of E.’
Charles Skinner
London W2

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close