X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Opera

Scandal at court

8 December 2012

9:00 AM

8 December 2012

9:00 AM

L’incoronazione di Poppea

Royal College of Music

The way the director James Conway sees it, Monteverdi’s last opera L’incoronazione di Poppea is about that most delicate of subjects, adult abuse by youngsters. That isn’t what he says in his programme note for his production at the Royal College of Music, where he claims that the opera is about power, ‘love, yes, but love’s power’. That is tendentious: you might as well say that Otello is about the power of jealousy, which is true, but that doesn’t make it ‘really’ about power; or that Wozzeck is about the power of powerlessness, etc. Poppea is about several things, power among them, but also love, jealousy, ambition, ruthlessness, the abuse of power.

In the second cast, which I saw, the central figure is very much Poppea, since she is played by Louise Alder, who will certainly become a major figure in opera if she projects as well in big houses as in the delightfully small Britten Theatre. She gives a consummate performance, and what she conveys is indeed disturbing: dressed as a Gretel figure in Act I, with a juvenating blonde wig and button shoes, she makes all the erotic pace with Nero, while never forgetting that she is just as eager to be Empress as she is to make love very often indeed. Early on, after Nero’s departure, she caresses a black pistol so lovingly that I thought it was a dildo, giving a new twist to Mae West’s celebrated remark about being pleased to see her. Her singing is ravishing, too, with a quality of both brightness and allure.

Unfortunately Rannveig Karadottir’s Nero is not on the same level. She is a reasonably commanding figure, but with an only moderately strong voice, which she doesn’t use to much expressive purpose. The opera is set, by the way, roughly in Stalin’s Russia, which isn’t in itself objectionable, but for all the sudden disappearances of innocent people, the intrigue, and so on, we don’t associate it with the kind of decadence and pervasive eroticism Monteverdi (or whoever wrote the opera) evokes. The fearful Soviet uniforms are effective, though they consort oddly with the three goddesses who launch the work — it’s notable that the only one who intervenes is Amor; she aborts the plot to murder Poppea, while Virtu and Fortuna never get a chance to intervene.


The other dominant presence in this production is Poppea’s spurned lover Ottone, played with marvellous intensity and unease by the African–American Tai Oney, possessor of an appealing countertenor voice and an equally expressive face. The final line in Act I, Ottone’s ‘I have Drusilla on my lips, but Poppea in my heart’, is the opera’s most poignant moment. The poor man has been trying to persuade himself for the previous ten minutes that he has Drusilla in both places, but he is evidently fighting a losing battle. The object of his would-be affections is Anna Anandarajah, who gives an acute performance, conveying both Drusilla’s sweetness and how irritating she is, going around saying she is happy. She makes a perfect foil for Poppea, who makes no bones about telling fate to be on her side.

In this scandalous opera — didn’t anyone at the time object, do people even now worry enough about its breezy amorality? — the moral centre is Seneca, and he is a platitudinous thunderer, appropriately dressed in this production like Solzhenitsyn, though he looks younger than that sage ever managed to. David Hansford has a true bass and booms effectively if not always with reliable pitch. Unfortunately, the scene in which he’s told to stop being a sententious windbag is cut, and we move on too soon to his death scene, in which his familiars beg him not to kill himself, celebrating the fragile joys of this life in some of Monteverdi’s most affecting music.

I was spoilt for that scene 50 years ago by Raymond Leppard’s version at Glyndebourne, still insufficiently celebrated for the fact that he gets Monteverdi’s tone so perfectly, whatever the excesses of the arrangement might be. We don’t hear nearly enough Monteverdi, but without Leppard we would hear far less. Fiona Mackenzie made an imposing and vengeful Ottavia, Simon Gilkes an excellently sung but vulgar and unfunny Arnalta. The omnicompetent Michael Rosewell conducts a small band with vigour if with too unvarying tempi.

The production, which will be one of English Touring Opera’s offerings next year, is severely cut. Scenes are pruned, some are omitted. The most startling cut is, of all things, the coronation of Poppea. I know it requires extra resources, but not to have it there at all is ridiculous, and certainly much lessens the swooning impact of the lovers’ final duet, ravishingly as it was sung. The least interesting part of the work musically is the plot to murder Poppea, but it’s hard to see how it can be more abbreviated. No more criticisms: this was a wonderful evening, and I hope that by this time next year the production will have created many more Poppea addicts.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close