X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Long life

Long life: How to fall off a moving bus backwards and land safely

25 May 2013

9:00 AM

25 May 2013

9:00 AM

My mother’s father, Sir Richard Paget Bt, was not just an old-fashioned Somerset landowner but also an amateur scientist, artist and musician of boundless energy and curiosity, whose achievements included the writing of a book on the origins of human speech, the invention of a sign language for the deaf, the hand-crafting of musical instruments, and the composing and publication of various long-forgotten songs. And he was always propounding bizarre theories that he liked to test by using his children as guinea pigs, however hazardous this might be for them.

At some point during the first world war, when my mother was a teenager, he was with her on a bus in St James’s Street — one of those buses that had an open platform at the back — and told her that when a bus was going at a certain speed, and provided you kept your body ramrod straight, you could fall horizontally backwards off the platform and then find yourself blown vertical and running gaily along the road. Announcing that the bus was now going at exactly the right speed, he successfully accomplished this feat himself and then shouted at her to do the same. When she hesitated, he abused her for being ‘lily-livered’; so she plucked up her courage and fell. But she fell in too crumpled a manner, so ended up lying on the ground with a broken arm.

For many years such an experiment has been impossible, but this week Boris Johnson has been writing in the Daily Telegraph that buses with open platforms are about to return to London with a vengeance. After a long wait, his promised replacement for the much-mourned Routemaster is about to arrive ‘en masse’, taking over Route 24 from Pimlico to Hampstead Heath. By 2016, he writes, there will be 600 of them on the streets of London.

[Alt-Text]


The Mayor does not recommend my grandfather’s kind of irresponsible behaviour; he says you shouldn’t get on or off a bus while it is moving and that ‘you should look around to see that there aren’t any motorbikes or cycles approaching’. But he celebrates the fact the people will again be free to get on and off buses between stops, even though this involves some risk: ‘It is, as far as I know, one of the few recent examples of a public policy that actually gives back, to sentient and responsible adults, the chance to take an extra risk in return for a specific reward.’

For the first time this made me think that Boris Johnson, despite his buffoonery, might be a better leader of the Conservative party than David Cameron. For while Cameron has been infuriating his party’s activists with his needless advocacy of such things as gay marriage and wind farms, Johnson has adopted a policy that must warm the cockles of every Tory’s heart. It is a plan not for change, of which most Conservatives are naturally suspicious, but for turning the clock back. And it is also a welcome kick in the teeth for ‘Health and Safety’.

I wonder if it wasn’t so much the miners who lost Edward Heath the second election of 1974 as his county boundary changes earlier in the year, which had outraged many Tories but especially my mother, who in late middle age had moved back to Somerset, the county of her birth and upbringing, only to find that she was suddenly living in a new county called Avon. So she had to move again, further south, to be in the county she had wanted. Subsequent measures undid some of the changes, abolishing Avon and restoring Rutland, for example, but it is interesting that nearly 40 years on, the pain is still felt, as shown by a recent correspondence in the Daily Telegraph, begging for the return of the Vale of the White Horse to Berkshire from Oxfordshire. ‘Prior to this act of cultural vandalism,’ wrote Nikolai Tolstoy, ‘the Thames had constituted the county boundary since Saxon times.’

I feel sorry for David Cameron all the same. He has to hold his coalition together while suffering attacks both from Europe-hating party activists and from old party grandees such as Lord Lawson and Lord Howe. Whether or not the current Conservative élite regards the former as ‘swivel-eyed’, all previous party élites certainly looked upon them in that sort of way. In an interview in Monday’s Telegraph the former foreign secretary Lord Carrington, now 94, said he hoped Cameron would survive the current storm but added: ‘You know what the Conservative party is like.’ His interviewer, Peter Oborne, asked him if it had got worse since his day. ‘Even worse,’ he replied. Even so, there must be some policy Cameron could adopt that would make the Tories love him a little more.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close