Books

What’s in a Surname, by David McKie - review

21 September 2013

9:00 AM

21 September 2013

9:00 AM

What’s in a Surname? A Journey from Abercrombie to Zwicker David McKie

Random House, pp.294, £14.99

In South Korea, some 20 million people share just five surnames. Every one of Denmark’s top 20 surnames ends in ‘-sen’, meaning ‘son of’, a pattern that is replicated across Scandinavia. British surnames have never favoured such neatness, and we can be grateful for that. While we may have lost such delightfully chewy names as Crackpot, Crookbones and Sweteinbede, the average city will still provide its Slys, Haythornthwaites, and McGillikuddys.

David McKie’s winding and sensitive study of British surnames is based on his findings in cemeteries, registers and oral accounts across six villages called Broughton, from Hampshire to Furness. It is a structure that allows the author to linger on the fate of particular names and their bearers — those that migrated, those that flourished, or faded with the end of the male line, and those that became the catalyst for bitter feuding and bloodshed.

McKie’s fascination is with the stories of real individuals: the powerful families whose forebears crossed the channel in 1066 — among them the Sinclairs, Nevilles and D’Arcys — as well as those who lived for their names and frequently died for them. Around a third of William’s conquering army were Flemings, a name meaning someone from Flanders and traditionally associated with trade and entrepreneurship. When English merchants began to resent the new competition, the results were dramatic — McKie relates how many of the Flemings who had settled in London were hunted down by mobs and forced to speak such words as ‘bread and cheese’. If their response sounded like ‘brod’ and ‘caisse’ they would be set upon and slaughtered.

[Alt-Text]


In the 17th century, surnames were harnessed to more peaceful, but no less manipulative, ends. Under the influence of the Puritans, the practice arose of baptising children with scriptural or pious phrases annexed to their last name. Hence there are church records of such names as Preserved Fish, Thankful Thorpe, Repentance Water, Kill-sin Pimple, and Humiliation Hinde. Conversely, other surnames of the period offer unflinchingly pithy descriptions of the condition of the bearer, including Blackinthemouth, Blubber, Mad, Measle, Peckcheese, and Hatechrist.

Many such examples would have begun as nicknames, a significant category in the origin of surnames. Gyldenbollockes was a popular name on the streets of medieval England, centuries before David Beckham, while others such as Thynne and Belcher speak for themselves. And yet in all such cases, McKie is rightly keen to emphasise the rarity of an easy answer. The ancestors of anyone called Brown today may have traditionally worn brown cloth, but they may also have been of swarthy complexion; similarly, the surname Stout may have begun as the result of medieval humour and an epithet for one who was notably skinny.

Nonetheless, the importance of such nicknames must not be underestimated: not only are they the source of a great number of British surnames, they also provide dictionary-makers with important evidence of a word’s early use. McKie might be amused to know that, while the first quotation in the Oxford English Dictionary’s entry for bilberry is dated 1584, the Court Roll of Nottingham offers evidence of one ‘Adam Bilberylyp’ who lived some two centuries earlier (presumably with vividly purple lips). Even the F-word is first recorded, as far back as the 13th century, in some very unfortunate surnames.

The perspective of McKie’s study is an ambitious one. He takes in surnames from fiction (Murtlock suggests murder, while Bagshaws tend to wear ill-fitting corduroys), those from myth and legend (including Rumplestiltskin, who is safe only for as long as his name remains undiscovered), and some important ones from today whose meanings would surprise us all. If we were to judge a politician by their surname, David Cameron would have a crooked nose, George Osborne would be a divine bear, and Chris Huhne a bogeyman.

There are plenty of surname dictionaries available, intended for quick and easy reference. What’s in a Name? is resolutely not one of those. This is a book for reading, and it is one that requires persistence. In many ways it is as gnarly as the names that have intrigued and baffled onomasts for centuries, and that is its greatest asset. If not all of the paths McKie travels deserve quite as much detail as he gives them, there are plenty more that pay off handsomely. The readers that follow them will, by the end, find themselves amply equipped to tackle the question in the book’s title.

Susie Dent is an English lexicographer and adjudicator on Channel 4’s Countdown.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
  • Mnestheus

    Captain Preserved Fish rose to fame and fortune in consequence of his first command, conveying a schooner coastwise from Halifax,Nova Scotia to the port of New York.

    On entering American waters he was hailed by a revenue cutter , demanding to know his business:

    “What ship are you ?”
    The Flying Fish

    “Who’s your captain ?
    Preserved Fish<

    “What’s your cargo ?”
    Pickled fish

    The revenue vessel immediately boarded him, only to discover his papers and the ship’s in perfect order, and her hold filled with barrells of pickled herring. The honest mariner’gained further fame ashore with his office sign ashore, which advertissed

    Captain Preserved Fish
    Dealer in Whale Oil
    Good and Bad

  • Jackthesmilingblack

    Keep in mind George Orwell was born “Eric Arthur Blair”, but he
    changed his name as he had a premonition that something terrible would be
    associated with the name “Blair”. The man that destroyed Britain, perhaps?

    • levinjf

      Maybe that explains why Clinton changed is birth father name–Blair–to Clinton.

  • therealguyfaux

    Any explanation in this volume as to why certain surnames are pronounced differently to the way their spelling would suggest? (And no, I’m not talking about “Raymond Luxury-Yacht,” pronounced “Throat Warbler-Mangrove.”) The famous exchange of Cholmondeley and Bottomley comes to mind…

Close
Can't find your Web ID? Click here