X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Features Australia

The racism of the Left

It is possible to ‘experience’ racist behaviour where none exists

8 August 2015

9:00 AM

8 August 2015

9:00 AM

When two people are in a room, psychological theory tells us that there are really six people present. There are the perceptions that both people have of themselves and their companion as well as they way they really are. It is a reminder that our realities are built entirely in our minds and that in a diverse community, there will be hundreds of perceptions for the same events or comments.

The heady, non-stop debates around race in the past month surrounding Adam Goodes have once again raised questions whether Australia has a racist underbelly. While I have never subscribed to the idea that Australia is any more racist than comparable countries, especially given we score so highly on measures such as social mobility, mixed marriages and migration demand, it is difficult to argue that the subhuman implications of calling someone an animal or telling them to ‘go back to the zoo’ as many spectators have done, can have anything other than strong racial overtones. The fact that many fans could not see the connection suggest that there has been a failure of both education and empathy. Despite the marked split in public opinions, the saga will embolden those who see racism as explanatory for many of Australia’s social ills.

It illustrates another trend where the argument that the opinions of the majority are null and void when it comes to the experience of minority groups continues to gain traction. This is a position argued by feminists when it comes to sexism or domestic violence, ethnic groups when it comes to racism and homosexuals when it comes to gay marriage. It was at the heart of the failure of Brandis’s attempts to change the Racial Discrimination Act. This is an argument that prioritises the perceptions of one group or one set of individuals above another.

In this respect, as Clive James argued in an essay for the London Review of Books this year, Australia is the strongest example of the French philosopher Pascal Bruckner’s assertion that multiculturalism is the racism of the anti-racists. Australia’s dominant culture is increasingly seen by ethnic leaders and their supporters as an insult to its minority groups. Likewise, the problem of integrating Muslims is highlighted by the fact that despite Australia’s history of many ethnic groups integrating relatively smoothly, sections of the Islamic community are representative of the first wave of migrants that despise Western civilisation as much as left wing intellectuals always have.

Part of my work involves assessing psychological claims for either legal representatives or insurance companies. Arguments, claims and counter-claims around bullying are a common source of conflict. Perceptions are a critical factor in such assessments.


For example, a worker who may have suffered a degree of bullying as a teenager in the playground and may have long had difficulties with assertiveness, is far more likely to experience the criticism or feedback of a boss as akin to the bullying. This is partly why bullying claims so often overlap with negative performance reviews. Likewise, the person who has had difficulties with abusive relationships is more likely to experience robust interactions with colleagues as intimidating or threatening. This is not say there aren’t plenty of instances of unacceptable bullying, but that perceptions can vary wildly.

When applied to racism, there are some interesting trends that help explain Australia’s perennial problems with being accused of racism. Moral psychologists argue that a key area of variation among different cultural groups is their norms surrounding authority, hierarchy, perceptions of what is sacred and attitudes towards care and harm. When assessing claims about racism, the differentials in views about authority and hierarchy are particularly striking.

For example, I have met several English doctors over the years who have complained they are surprised by the lack of hierarchy on occasions in Australian workplaces, illustrated by requests from nurses to do the photocopying or handed over routine administrative work usually reserved for secretaries. The English are more likely to experience such behaviour as rude and as evidence of the rough, blunt edges of the Australian egalitarian character.

The same behaviour when applied to doctors from the subcontinent however, is often experienced as a blight on their racial background. It is quite paramount for Indian medicos where attitudes around status and hierarchy are much more stratified. But those from an ethnic minority background are more likely to experience what in some situations can be the endearing Australian traits of being overfamiliar, egalitarian or blunt as being racist.

The accusation that Australia has high rates of so-called casual racism has strong overlaps with these variations in attitudes surrounding hierarchy and authority. It is something that, over time, ethnic groups come to appreciate and emulate, but the unique behaviours are not so endearing on first contact. We more closely resemble a nation of sledgers than racists.

There is an even greater complexity with regards to the indigenous experience – which does not entirely overlap with the experience of ethnic groups. It is wrong to make extensions about the national character from the Goodes episode, not least because the anonymity, escape and disinhibition sporting crowds can provide mean they function as their own beast.

Debates about racism are surfacing strongly across the Western world in parallel with the unprecedented flow of irregular, migrant arrivals fleeing either conflict zones, poverty or a lack of opportunity.

But the Goodes episode, while displaying some uncomfortable features, is evidence that the perceptions of individuals from minority groups are being increasingly treated as the only, relevant reality and that the self-loathing of Australian progressives surrounding race is without peer.

Dr Tanveer Ahmed is a psychiatrist, media commentator and author.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close