X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Features

Our debt to the children of the Reformation

Secular society is based on Protestant values. So why don’t Church leaders acknowledge it?

28 January 2017

9:00 AM

28 January 2017

9:00 AM

‘The Reformation was a process of both renewal and division among Christians in Europe,’ said the Archbishops of Canterbury and York in a ‘joint reflection’ statement marking 500 years of Protestantism. ‘In this Reformation anniversary year, many Christians will want to give thanks for the great blessings they have received to which the Reformation directly contributed.’

Many will want to? OK, but what about you? Why this timid slippage into the third person? Some journalists reported the statement as an apology. They were technically wrong, but tonally correct. It reminded me of the day after Brexit, when Boris and Gove were so nervous of seeming cocky that they forgot to seem glad. This statement was similarly careful to balance affirmation with hand-wringing.

To most of us, the Reformation is little more than a supplier of plot twists in Tudor costume dramas. If we’re devotees of art, we’ll shake our heads at ripped-out rood screens and whitewashed apocalypses in rural churches. If we’re religious, the whole business might mean something more. But, if we’re Anglican, we might not be sure whether to cheer or repent; we might echo the archbishops’ ambivalence.

Just a few decades ago, things were rather different. There was still a lingering assumption that Protestantism was at the heart of Britain’s identity. For most of the 20th century this assumption was very strong. Protestantism was felt to be a key ingredient in our core ideological tradition, which might be summed up as ‘liberty’.

You didn’t have to be religious to think so. Ever since Victorian times, atheists and agnostics had thought of themselves as honorary Protestants. John Stuart Mill, for example, recalled his atheist father urging him ‘to take the strongest interest in the Reformation, as the great and decisive contest against priestly tyranny for liberty of thought’. Later in the century Thomas Henry Huxley, inventor of ‘agnosticism’ and preacher of evolution, said his agenda was rooted in ‘that conviction of the supremacy of private judgment…which is the foundation of the Protestant Reformation.’

This link between Protestantism and individual liberty remained axiomatic for all sorts of 20th-century thinkers and politicians, on the left as well as the right. It was part of the empire creed of Churchill and Enoch Powell, and part of the Roundhead socialism of Michael Foot and Tony Benn.


Well, we’re free of such tired old prejudices now, aren’t we? For decades now, the idea that Protestantism brought us liberal progress has been dismissed and derided as hopelessly outdated ‘Whiggish history’. Countless historians have warned us against seeing Tudor reformers as the nearly–modern goodies, and Catholics as the reactionary baddies. It was all rather more complicated than that, more ‘finely balanced’. The old narrative was fuelled by anti-Catholic prejudice and crude nationalism, says the new orthodoxy. Good riddance to it.

I don’t think the old narrative deserves the fashionable contempt that intellectuals have heaped on it. I don’t think I am entirely motivated by anti-Catholicism and dated nationalism when I see a very strong link between Protestantism and the rise of liberal humanism. Rather, I suspect I am stating the unfashionable but bleeding obvious.

Admittedly, there wasn’t very much liberal or humanist about Luther or Calvin, not to mention Henry VIII. The link was formed in the next generation or two. It was in Protestant lands, especially England and Holland, that an intense new humanism emerged in the 17th century. Some of the pioneers were radically religious — such as the Puritans, who demanded liberty of religion and so launched the idea of the separation of church and state, ending the long reign of theocracy.

Others were rationalists, but their rationalism was intensely influenced by radical Protestant belief. The fact is that just about all of the major Enlightenment thinkers, from Spinoza and Locke to Voltaire and Jefferson, and Kant and Hegel, were either Protestants or were decisively influenced by Protestantism. The secular humanism that gradually emerged did not come from nowhere. The whole idea of universal human rights came from the rational version of Christianity developed chiefly by Protestants. The humanism that we (nearly) all vaguely affirm is not just the ideology that comes naturally to human beings. It is a moral tradition with deep roots in the Christian centuries — and it was Protestantism that enabled the transition from a religious to secular framework.

 

We’re not just talking about abstract ideas. The actual tradition of practical humanism was chiefly advanced by committed Protestants, from the Quakers who modelled egalitarianism (including for women) to the evangelicals who denounced slavery as a violation of the brotherhood of man, to all the campaigners for better treatment of the poor. And in recent times it was Protestantism that produced the foremost prophet of social justice, Martin Luther King.

This basic story, of Protestant Christianity giving rise to secular humanism, is almost entirely swept under the carpet. Even though it defines us to a huge extent, it is barely acknowledged. It is more likely to be dismissed as a relic from the intellectual past. Why? Because it is not in the interest of either secular thinkers or religious thinkers to acknowledge it. It embarrasses both camps. Agnostics and atheists are reluctant to admit their debt to the religion they enjoy looking down on. So they pretend that secular humanism is just natural, the default position of all rational people.

But what about Christians? Don’t they want to highlight the Christian basis of secular humanism? Surely this is a rather strong argument for Christianity? That it is at the root of the values we share? But no, Anglicans prefer not to highlight this issue. They fear seeming like the wet cheerleaders of secular humanism. They prefer posing as its tough opponents. For years, liberal Protestantism has been on the back foot, unsure how to affirm its affinity with secular humanism without selling out.

A new approach is called for. We Protestants should be proud that our tradition has given rise to secular humanism. This does not mean our tradition has been superseded. We should have the confidence to affirm this offshoot, just as a good parent has the confidence to affirm his or her child.

When the archbishops briefly and nervously speak of ‘the great blessings to which the Reformation directly contributed’, they stick to religious stuff: they mention the ‘clear proclamation of the gospel of grace, the availability of the Bible to all in their own language and the recognition of the calling of lay people to serve God in the world and in the church.’

How about also getting a little bit world-historical? They should point out to secular humanists that most of the freedoms they take for granted were hewn from the rock of history by the brave children of the Reform-ation. It was Protestants who battled theocracy and nurtured the frail shoots of liberty that now seem axiomatic, obvious, natural (if you’re lucky enough to live in the post-Protestant West).

On behalf of Protestantism, I’d just like to say this: you’re welcome.

Theo Hobson is the author of God Created Humanism: the Christian Basis of Secular Values.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close