X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Cinema

So long and repetitive, I had a nap: Silence reviewed

Dramatic monotony is accompanied by punishing length to produce a testing Scorsese snoozefest about Jesuit missionaries in Japan

7 January 2017

9:00 AM

7 January 2017

9:00 AM

Silence

15, Nationwide

Silence is Martin Scorsese’s film about Jesuit priests in 17th-century Japan whose faith is sorely tested, just as your patience will be sorely tested too. There are moments of grandeur. The landscape is lush, and often mistily beautiful. The torture porn is spectacularly inventive. But its commercial compromises may drive you to distraction (the casting, the language choices), it is punishingly repetitive and, at nearly three hours, sooooooo, sooooooo long. My own patience was sorely tested to the point that I might have taken a little bit of a nap. If I did I never sensed I missed anything of note, but then it is that kind of film.

This is based on the 1966 novel by Shusaku Endo who was, unusually, a Japanese Catholic, known as ‘the Japanese Graham Greene’. The novel fictionalises true historical events and the persecution of Christians in 17th-century Japan as a means of exploring cultural difference, the nature of belief, imperialism and what it costs to follow Jesus Christ when life isn’t going too well and you may be hung upside down over a pit with a nick in your neck — to bleed to death, slowly — for your trouble. (For anyone who is of the mind that the Japanese have always been unfairly stereotyped as horrendously cruel sadists there is absolutely no succour here.)

Scorsese, who himself studied for the priesthood early on, had wanted to make this film for 30 years — he vowed that if Wolf of Wall Street was a success, he would go for it — and while we’re all for people fulfilling their dreams, couldn’t they be restricted to 90-minute ones? Or, it being a long-cherished project, 100 minutes, max? We have lives, you know.


The basic plot is simple: two Portuguese priests, Father Rodrigues (Andrew Garfield) and Father Garupe (Adam Driver), who speak to each other in English with peculiar, intensely distracting accents, travel to Japan to search for their beloved mentor, Father Ferreira (Liam Neeson, in a role that doesn’t demand he beats the shit out of everybody …hallelujah!). Ferreira, they have heard, has apostatised and gone native, which they find impossible to believe. The film opens with a flashback prologue of Ferreira being forced to watch boiling water being ladled over the bodies of Japanese Christians (‘Kirishitans’). Each small splash, his voiceover tells us, feels ‘like a burning coal’. Henceforward, the theology, while presenting itself as complex, is, in fact, also basic, as this is a film that essentially keeps asking the same question: if your belief is causing suffering to others, should you renounce it? (‘Yes!’ said our panel of experts, but then they did have homes they wished to get back to.)

Driver, the more interesting, more awkwardly angular actor is, alas, sidelined early on, so we’re left with Garfield, whose accent remains iffy, whose hair remains glossily coiffed, whose features remain placidly bland, and who does not offer the depth and heft of, say, Neeson who, it turns out, is pretty good when not beating the shit out of everybody — who knew? — and is able to convey both anguish and torment. Rodrigues, meanwhile, tends to his Kirishitan flock, who have been forced underground. He performs masses and baptisms and hears confessions until discovered by the ‘Inquisitor’ (Issey Ogata), who will do whatever it takes to get Rodrigues to trample on the fumie — a crude bronze plate depicting the face of Christ. ‘Trample, trample!’ urged our expert panel, but Rodrigues won’t trample, and the more he won’t trample, the more Kirishitans are tortured. He can hear their screams from his prison cell. He is made to watch as they’re crucified at sea, burned alive, bound and tossed from boats. Also, that thing with the neck and the pits, and whatever I might have missed, if I did have a little nap.

I am hopelessly squeamish, as we know, but I did not squeam. This was party because it’s just so dramatically monotonous — he’s still refusing to trample; here comes another torture — but also because we are not led to feel anything for the Kirishitans, who are treated as disposable and never as full-blooded characters or even fellow human beings. (They’re like extras from The Mikado who’ve hit a spot of bother.) The other narrative imperative is the showdown between Rodrigues and Ferreira, but this is wholly anti-climatical, offering up none of the answers you yourself were rather praying for.

As I’ve never read the book, I can’t comment on any faithfulness in this respect, but much of the script does sound like literary prose read aloud, and it is also repetitive. The ‘silence’ refers to no word from God, even when people are suffering. ‘How can I explain his silence to these people who have endured so much?’ asks Rodrigues, in various forms, over and over, like we just didn’t get it the first time. (‘We got it!’ said our panel.) Also, it is sooooooo, sooooooo long …but I think I already mentioned that.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close