X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Status anxiety

Proof that the arts lobby is wrong about Michael Gove’s GCSE reform

Under the EBacc, it turns out, more kids are taking arts GCSEs

11 February 2017

9:00 AM

11 February 2017

9:00 AM

For the past six years or so a variety of arts organisations have been campaigning against the English Baccalaureate, or the ‘EBacc’, as it’s known. To meet this standard, schoolchildren have to get grade C or above in seven GCSEs (Eng lang, Eng lit, maths, two sciences, a humanity and a foreign language) and, according to the campaigners, this means students have been turning away from arts GCSE subjects such as music, drama and dance. They claim that since the EBacc’s introduction by Michael Gove, arts education has been decimated.

Now, I have some sympathy for the lobby groups making this argument. The first part of their case — that the arts are one of the UK’s biggest strengths and are increasingly critical to our economic success — is unassailable. Since 1997, the growth of Britain’s creative industries has outstripped that of many other sectors, adding a gross value of over £84 billion, or 5.2 per cent of the UK’s GDP, in 2014. No one in this debate is suggesting that arts education isn’t hugely important, although the anti-EBacc lobbyists might think otherwise.

Where the two sides part company is on the data. The Department for Education’s response is to deny that the EBacc has had any negative impact on the popularity of GCSEs in arts subjects. In fact, the number of arts GCSEs taken last year was higher than it was before the EBacc was introduced. And that’s in spite of an overall decline in the pupil population. So who’s right?


In my new role as director of the New Schools Network, a charity that helps groups set up free schools, I decided to ask one of my team (Ed Fellows) to do a deep dive into the GCSE data for the last five years and try to get to the bottom of this. It wasn’t just intellectual curiosity. NSN has been trying to persuade more arts organisations to set up schools and the response we often get back (although not always, I’m pleased to say) is that they’d be on a hiding to nothing. The EBacc makes it impossible to create a school with a strong arts focus. So I wanted to find out if they were right. If they are, we should probably abandon this campaign; if not, we can show them our analysis to allay their fears.

Well, it turns out the government is bang on the money and the anti-EBacc brigade is wrong. I know, I know. That makes me sound like a toady and I daresay the critics of Gove’s education reforms will think, ‘Well, he would say that wouldn’t he?’ But the data is clear. If you look at the number of GCSE entries last year in art and design, dance, drama, expressive arts and performance studies, film studies, media, film and television studies, music, and performing arts, it has increased since 2012, which was the last year before the EBacc could conceivably have influenced students’ GCSE choices. It went up 2 per cent, in fact, from a little under 315,000 in 2012 to more than 320,000 last year.

This isn’t because schoolchildren interested in the arts have switched from vocational arts qualifications to GCSEs in arts subjects. If that were the case, the GCSE rise might be disguising an overall decline in arts education. But it isn’t. The absolute number of students doing vocational arts qualifications also increased between 2012 and last year. The figures are in an Arts Report downloadable from the NSN’s website.

So what accounts for the contradictory data produced by the other side? Two things. First, they include independent schools, where there really has been a decline in the uptake of arts GCSEs in the past five years. But that’s a bit rum because it doesn’t make sense to talk about an ‘EBacc effect’ in private schools — the Education Secretary’s writ doesn’t extend to the independent sector. Second, they include the subject of design and technology in their definition of arts subjects, and the uptake of that particular GCSE has declined significantly. But that’s also cheating because it isn’t classed as an arts subject in the national curriculum. Not surprising, because it covers areas like ‘electronics’ and ‘resistant materials’.

I hope arts organisations across the sector will welcome this finding. No conflict with the EBacc after all. We also made another discovery: those state schools that combine high expectations in a core of academic subjects with a strong focus on the arts are some of the best performers in the country. So come and see us at NSN, arts practitioners. We will welcome you with open arms.

Toby Young is associate editor of The Spectator.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close