At dinner the other night I was asked, "Do you think he will live?" The he in question, of course, being Barack Hussein Obama. Nor was this the first time I'd been asked this. I suspect that such fears are more widely held than you might care to think. And that left me thinking that for all that there's plenty of fine reporting from America in the British press, there has been, in some respects, a collective failure to understand how much the United States has changed. That is to say, it is always easier to focus upon tales of American weirdness, of gun-toting rednecks and bible-thumpers and all the rest of it. These are colourful parts of the American quilt, but they tend to receive disproportionate attention from the international press.
Of course, there are also plenty of Americans, as Dan Drezner suggests, who dismissed the possibility of a moment like this ever arriving too (as did a good number of African-Americans too) and only a fool would suggest that Obama's election itself can end the agonising over race that has, quite naturally, been a central, if not always acknowledged, part of the American experience. (It emains strikingly difficult for blacks to win statewide races, for instance, to say nothing of the gaps in educational achievement, infant mortality, incarceration etc etc.) Equally, its clear that some of the pride many Americans naturally feel today is mingled with an element of surprise that this day has in fact arrived at all.
Nonetheless, we've been slow, perhaps too slow, to appreciate how much has changed in the past 20 years, let alone the past 40. We're familiar with the stories of Bill Cosby and Oprah Winfrey; Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods; Will Smith and Denzel Washington but we've perhaps failed to fully appreciate the overall impact of the "colourisation" of American culture.
One consequence of this, I think, is how the international press has paid too little attention to the fact that, increasingly, class is replacing race as the biggest dividing line in America. Some of this, for sure, falls along racial lines. But not all of it. In some ways the kid growing up in a trailer park in rural West Virginia has more in common with the black boy in north Philly than either has with the suburban kids aspiring to Ivy League or the leading public universities.
What this means, I think, is that middle-class, college-educated America is indeed, in many ways, a "post-racial" society in which choices may be informed by race but are not necessarily determined by it. In working-class America - especially the poorer parts of the south and Appalachia, stretching through the Ozarks and into Oklahoma - this is not the case. The white working-class that identifies itself as "American-Americans" is increasingly alienated from the rest of the country, just as the corner kids in the inner-city are still being left behind.
By 2023, census estimates predict, "minorities" will make up a majority of children under 18; the country as a whole is predicted to be majority-minority by 2042. As matters stand right now, that's your Emerging Democratic Majority. Which is a problem for the Republican party that, at present, the GOP shows little sign of being able to address.
The challenge for the Republican party then is to find a way to address the needs of the working-class white America that is still reliably Republican that does not repel or trespass upon the sensitivities and interests of middle-class, affluent, suburban America. in other words, finding a way to build a coalition that transcends race and class. Right now, that seems a pretty tough proposition.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (5)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 How Britain is using spin to con the bond markets - Miles Huddleston
2 Will Greece run out of German sympathy? - James Forsyth
3 Boris keeps on charming his party - James Forsyth
4 Brooks charges mean more trouble for Cameron - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
ndm
January 20th, 2009 3:49pm Report this commentThe challenge for the Republican party then is to find a way to address the needs of the working-class white America that is still reliably Republican that does not repel or trespass upon the sensitivities and interests of middle-class, affluent, suburban America. in other words, finding a way to build a coalition that transcends race and class. Right now, that seems a pretty tough proposition.
And it is especially tough if the Republicans start believing Sarah Palin is the answer.
ben
January 20th, 2009 5:25pm Report this commentIs there a particular reason for using Obama's middle name all the time? It's really neither big nor clever, you know.
JimB
January 20th, 2009 6:08pm Report this commentAlternatively, imagine a Palin-like politician who figures out how to appeal to working class blacks and Hispanics in addition to working class whites. The core appeal would be a common resentment of the elites. The Republicans could reach a majority with a platform that would scare the hell out of the upper middle class.
Conservative Cabbie
January 21st, 2009 12:44am Report this commentThere's nothing to suggest that Sarah Palin is in anyway racist. Following her convention speech, the polls showed an incredible bounce in Republican support. States like New Jersey and Oregon were in play. Yes, some dodgy interviews, but also some incredibly biased media took the air out of that bounce along with a calamitious financial crisis. The bounce however did show that a working class Republican has a huge amount of appeal and that Nixon's silent majority or the Reagan Democrats still exist in America.
This election was about as propitious as it gets for Democrats. An economic disaster just weeks before the election, a incumbent Republican President with the lowest approval ratings in history, a celebrity candidate with massive appeal to the vacuous iPod generation who turned out the black and youth vote like never before. And after all that, only a three percent plurality. Things are far from disastrous for the GOP.
Ronnie
January 21st, 2009 6:42am Report this commentSo, JimB, you someone as dumb as Palin who is smart enough to figure all that out?
Back to top