Poor Canada; forever ignored and when it's not ignored forever patronised. Except when the Quebeckers become fractious, Canadian politics and life barely merits a mention in either the British or American press. We even tend to overlook the Canucks when the stories of the Great Wars of the twentieth century are told. How soon Vimy Ridge slips from consciousness. But Canada has plenty going for it (even if most of the Canadians I know don't actually live in Canada). So, three cheers for Fareed Zakaria's latest Newsweek column:
Guess which country, alone in the industrialized world, has not faced a single bank failure, calls for bailouts or government intervention in the financial or mortgage sectors. Yup, it's Canada. In 2008, the World Economic Forum ranked Canada's banking system the healthiest in the world. America's ranked 40th, Britain's 44th...Canada has also been shielded from the worst aspects of this crisis because its housing prices have not fluctuated as wildly as those in the United States. Home prices are down 25 percent in the United States, but only half as much in Canada. Why? Well, the Canadian tax code does not provide the massive incentive for overconsumption that the U.S. code does: interest on your mortgage isn't deductible up north... Ah, but you've heard American politicians wax eloquent on the need for these expensive programs—interest deductibility alone costs the federal government $100 billion a year—because they allow the average Joe to fulfill the American Dream of owning a home. Sixty-eight percent of Americans own their own homes. And the rate of Canadian homeownership? It's 68.4 percent.
Canada has been remarkably responsible over the past decade or so. It has had 12 years of budget surpluses, and can now spend money to fuel a recovery from a strong position. The government has restructured the national pension system, placing it on a firm fiscal footing, unlike our own insolvent Social Security. Its health-care system is cheaper than America's by far (accounting for 9.7 percent of GDP, versus 15.2 percent here), and yet does better on all major indexes. Life expectancy in Canada is 81 years, versus 78 in the United States; "healthy life expectancy" is 72 years, versus 69. American car companies have moved so many jobs to Canada to take advantage of lower health-care costs that since 2004, Ontario and not Michigan has been North America's largest car-producing region.
So, yes, let's hear it for Canada. For once. (Actually, given the number of Britons moving to the old dominions, we should class Canada as a great success story just as we do Australia.)
[Thanks to Will Wilkinson for the FZ heads-up.]
Filed under: Canada (10 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (22)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Rex Burr
February 11th, 2009 3:59pm Report this commentMy Son and Daughter in Law live in Vancouver.
They follow UK news on the Internet and wonder that all the fuss is about.
N
February 11th, 2009 4:12pm Report this commentDoes that mean Canada is going to be the "new" United States in North America now?
Fern Trejo
February 12th, 2009 12:09am Report this commentWhy don't we let the Canadian Banks start operating & lending money in the US!
imp
February 12th, 2009 12:19am Report this commentThe banksters have been keeping Canada solvent because they need a country to evacuate to after they've gutted the US economy.
Sherman
February 12th, 2009 12:23am Report this commentI wonder if one of the reasons is that Canada doesn't have the South. Seriously, think of the bad choices our country has made in the past thirty years, from wars to foolish tax cuts to terrible social policy and then look who pushed them. Far more often than not, it's Southerners.
Bruce
February 12th, 2009 12:32am Report this commentActually Canadian banks do have some activities in the US. One of them is TD Ameritrade. The TD stands for Toronto Dominion Bank.
Jedd Young
February 12th, 2009 1:00am Report this commentIt is meaningless to compare the US and Canada. The US has 305 million people and a 14.5 trillion dollar economy. Canada has 33m people and 1.3 trillion dollar economy. They are in two different classes and should be compared to countries of similar size / GDP. By the way, per capita GDP is roughly the same at $47,000. Both countries should be proud of this achievement. Particularly the US - which has achieved this despite millions of recent immigrants from impoverished countries.
johnnyk
February 12th, 2009 1:38am Report this commentTD Bank owns and operates TD Waterhouse in the USA.
Bank of Montreal owns Harrisbank of Chicago.
Jasper
February 12th, 2009 2:17am Report this commentI agree with Zakaria's thoughts here, except for his incorrect comment about America's "insolvent" Social Security system. The finances of Medicare (healthcare for old people) are pretty dire, indeed. But Social Security is in fairly robust shape, and will likely require only modest tinkering if any at all as the years go by.
ndm
February 12th, 2009 2:23am Report this commentJedd Young really needs to watch the film A Day Without a Mexican if he thinks "recent immigrants from impoverished countries" are a net loss to the American economy.
NWoolridge
February 12th, 2009 3:00am Report this commentJedd, just so you know: Canada accepts a far larger number of immigrants on a per capita basis than does the US. That is alluded to in the linked article.
AlisonS
February 12th, 2009 3:15am Report this commentCanada also has stricter regulation on our banks. They must retain a certain level of capitalization (not sure of the exact amount). Thank you Paul Martin for not allowing the craziness to take hold in our banking system. If our current bozo-in-chief had been in charge, we would be in the same boat as everyone else.
John T
February 12th, 2009 4:59am Report this commentJed Young says - 'the US - which has achieved this despite millions of recent immigrants from impoverished countries.' Canada has lots of imigrants from the same counties but they are generally seen as an asset
Robert
February 12th, 2009 6:10am Report this comment@ Jedd Young
FYI, recent immigration rates in Canada are around 240,000 per year. Immigration to the US is around 1,000,000 per year. With 1/10 the population, proportionately, Canada receives far more immmigrants from impoverished countries than the US.
Brad
February 12th, 2009 2:04pm Report this commentRobert, not going to get into it with you, but your figures are wrong by multiples. Figure in illegal immigration. Also, A day without a Mexican? Really? That's like directing someone who believes in evolution to www.doctordino.com . Regardless, the US should be taking note of some positive policies coming out of Canada.
Gracie
February 12th, 2009 2:08pm Report this commentPlease keep in mind that Canada is not engaged in two major wars that drain the economy of billions
Bill Johnson
February 12th, 2009 2:09pm Report this commentCanada - I salute you. Good, common sense, unassuming, hard working, Canada. A good friend, a good neighbor. Let's remember when Canada shielded our folks in Iran from the revolutionary wackos and helped them get out of there. Even with your Quebec issues and your leaders' occasional foray into clownishness, you guys have your act together. Draft-dogders didn't go there for nothing....
Leafs
February 12th, 2009 3:56pm Report this commentYes, please, world, just keep ignoring us. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Snowsurvivor
February 12th, 2009 4:44pm Report this commentGracie - Assuming one of the wars you are thinking of is in Afghanistan, Canada is very engaged there.
rofl
February 12th, 2009 6:05pm Report this commentThe Immigrants to Canada on average are more skilled and can contribute more to the workforce then people who swim across the Rio Grande and take up jobs raking leaves.
Robert
February 12th, 2009 9:47pm Report this comment@Brad, I'm perplexed.
If you state that you're not going to get into it with me, then why do you? Estimates put the number of illegal immigrants coming into the USA at half a million per year. That's not a difference of multiples. That's a difference of 50%. And it's still substantially lower than the amount that Canada lets in as a proportion of the total population. Also, I'm of the opinion that immigration is a good thing to the country, in the long term, whether illegal or not. One gets to acquire adults ready to work without having to invest the time and money required to raise them. One also gets to ameliorate the demographic trap (that plagues developed countries where families are raising less children, thus resulting in an aging population that requires more support from fewer young people in the workforce.)
The Surly Beaver
February 12th, 2009 9:53pm Report this comment@ Gracie
Actually, Canada has had troops in Afghanistan from about 2002 I think. And yes they've been helping with the heavy lifting. The Canadian government has spent a great deal of money upgrading equipment, particularly armoured vehicles.
Back to top