Ramesh Ponnuru disputes my suggestion that he is on the side of the Traditionalists in their battle with the Reformers over the future of the GOP. His view is that:
And yes, perhaps I was too hasty putting Ponnuru in the traditionalists' camp even if his column spends much more time arguing that the GOP needs Rush Limbaugh and not much time stressing the need for a recalibrated conservatism. (Nor, for that matter, does he suggest how the debate should be framed.)Still, his point is well-taken. But again, I don't think Frum and Brooks and co. want to eliminate the base, they just think it won't be enough in the future. And that seems one difference between the Reform movement and the Trads: the latter are more likely to think that the GOP just needs to be patient since the pendulum will swing back in its favour soon enough. The former, by contrast, fear that absent change then the party is going to have to wait even longer for that to happen.The point of my column was to question the wisdom of drawing the battle lines in those terms. Those of us who think that the conservative message should be modernized will fail to do so if we proceed by insulting traditionalists rather than trying to persuade them.
Or to put it another way, my sense is that the Traditionalists fear that change may cause conservatives to stay at home; the Reformers worry that no change means no hope of attracting centrist and young voters in the future. Here too, it seems to me that the Traditionalists take a shorter-term view than the Reformers. There is obviously something to be said for not ditching the old message until you can be sure that the new one will attract as many, and in fact more, voters; but there's also something in the notion that a party that does not modernise is not likely to thrive in a changing America. That is, you might need to risk some short term defections (stay-at-homes really) for the sake of longer term growth.
The weight you give these various notions is likely to determine - I think! - which side of the Reform vs Tradition fence you fall and the urgency with which you feel the need to debate these issues.
Filed under: GOP (332 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 How Britain is using spin to con the bond markets - Miles Huddleston
2 Will Greece run out of German sympathy? - James Forsyth
3 Boris keeps on charming his party - James Forsyth
4 Brooks charges mean more trouble for Cameron - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top