No surprise, alas, that the government should still be trying to find ways to deny Gurkhas the right to live in this country. The most charitable interpretation of today's announcement is that the Brown ministry is making it more difficult than it should be for Gurkhas who retired before 1997 to live in Britain. A more accurate assessment might be that this is a typically mendacious, mean-spirited, shameless, pointless piece of bullying bullshit from a government that's so past its sell-by date that there's no point in even wondering whether there's any further use for it.
Here's the BBC account:
And what, I ask you, would be the problem with 100,000 Gurkhas and their families moving to this country? Let 'em in, say I. The country will not fall if 100,000 tiny men from the Himalayas are permitted residence. And does Woolas not realise how absurd he looks when he spouts this nonsense. Evidently not.Immigration Minister Phil Woolas denied he had betrayed the Gurkhas, adding: "This improves the situation."He said: "It has never been the case that all Gurkhas pre-1997 were to be allowed to stay in the country. With their dependents you could be looking at 100,000 people.
"It's simply not true that we have betrayed the Gurkhas. When people read the guidelines they will see the sense of them."
Note too how the government argues that pre-1997, when the Gurkhas' HQ was still in Hong Kong, they had no "strong residential ties" with the United Kingdom. Apart, of course, from serving in the British Army - a service that common-sense suggests, no demands, one consider a pretty hefty tie to this country regardless of whether it's "residential" or not. Ultimately, how absurd is it that you can fight in the British army but be denied the right to live in Britain?
Then again, this is the Home Office so who can be surprised by the absence of charity, common-sense and decency on display in this shabby tale?
More from the Gurkha Justice Campaign here.
UPDATE: Mr Eugenides does some useful number-crunching.
Filed under: Britain (275 more articles) , Gurkhas (3 more articles) , Labour (338 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (14)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 There is only one question that frightens Brussels - Fraser Nelson
2 Printing money is not the solution - Humphrey Carpenter
3 Labour and the KGB - Fraser Nelson
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
UK Fred
April 24th, 2009 5:17pm Report this commentShameless decision from a shameless government. Gordon, it's time to go and take your self-serving pack of scavenging attack-dogs with you.
Gery
April 24th, 2009 5:29pm Report this commentI am pro-Ghurka and would like to know what a Conservative Government would do about this.It is unlikely that a large number of Ghurkas would want to live here, especially the older ones. After all, giving them the right to live here does not mean paying their airfares and resettlement costs.
mac
April 24th, 2009 5:33pm Report this comment"Then again, this is the Home Office so who can be surprised by the absence of charity, common-sense and decency on display in this shabby tale?"
Agreed.
But being championed by the elegant and delectable Joanna Lumley in the 'court of public opinion' will help no end. I don't think this is finished . . .
Rocky - Nairobi Kenya
April 24th, 2009 8:16pm Report this commentW*asel words from a We*asel home Office!
Allan
April 24th, 2009 8:46pm Report this commentThe Gurkhas have been betrayed.
Only one vote,but as a lifelong Labour supporter,this government have lost mine.
B Doherty
April 24th, 2009 10:41pm Report this commentI am disgusted by the Governments descision. These men where fearless defending our men and our course. We let criminal immigrants into this country who fleece the system. So what have the Ghurkhas done to deserve this treatment. Put it to a Public Vote and see the Goverment shamed, I have no doubt.
Fergus Pickering
April 25th, 2009 5:53am Report this commentArseholes! But of course they're arseholes. We knew that. What are WE (Tories I mean) going to do about it? Have We got honour?
tommyt
April 25th, 2009 9:06am Report this commentits difficult to find another issue which unites so many in UK politics today
sylvia Bristol
April 25th, 2009 9:16am Report this commentIf the government got rid of all the undesirables that should not be in this country then we would have plenty of room for OUR brave welcome heros
Gill Maharjan
April 25th, 2009 10:12pm Report this commentThe government displays a blatantly racist approach to the Nepali people in general. I am a British citizen but my partner is in Kathmandu and is not even able to get a visa to visit me - despite me having served as a JP, employing 45 people in a social enterprise and being a fellow of the royal society for the arts.The ghurkas have sacrificed their lives for Britain yet sadly the government do not appear to appreciate this. (And Sylvia - WHO are undesirable? Biggots and racists in my view!)
Sarah Shepton
April 25th, 2009 11:24pm Report this commentRather than grumbling into our beards, why don't we all expend the energy on writing to our MPs, signing up for the Gurkha Justice Campaign and getting as many other people to join us, with the aim of getting this mendacious Government to act honourably.
Now, I know that asking them to act honourably is like offering a fish a bicycle, but they do jerk their knees most violently when they think the public are against them - so let's make sure they feel the full weight of our disgust and disapproval.
I think I'd rather like having ex-Gurkhas as neighbours. We owe these people a moral debt and it's about time we started to do the decent thing.
Ronnie
April 27th, 2009 11:18am Report this commentPrehaps the Gurkhas would get on better with the Home Office if they promised to preach anti-western hatred in public, at least once a week, as a condition of their residency.
anjali
April 29th, 2009 12:00pm Report this commentMay be govt.would allow more of the terroist and muslims sucide bomers or illegal immigrants who r always after destroying the nation.Gurkhas r always there for this country and some r still dying in Afgan.They r the bravest,honest,loyal people to deserve what they've done for this country.Have u ever heard gurkhas commiting a crime against britain." NO NEVER " Instead they r still dying now and forever.
ubinpoon
June 16th, 2009 9:51am Report this commentwhy the son or dauhter stay in nepal? all his or her family in settled in uk but why the uk goverment look and not geeting vissa or settled in uk for his son or daughter? why why why only far from his family!!!!!!!!!!!!!!is it right???????????
Back to top