Subscribe to The Spectator

Friday 10 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Egyptian Reformers Boycott Obama's Speech

Wednesday, 3rd June 2009

More on the disappointing lack of emphasis Obama places on human rights and democratic reform. Mike Crowley reports from Cairo that Ayman Nour, the Egyptian dissident, has turned down an invitation to attend Obama's speech tomorrow:

The president's reticence to push Mubarak about democracy, Nour says, has been "a huge disappointment, not only from Egypt's perspective but for reformers all over the world. It's not in line with what he promised during the campaign, or with his inaugural speech on January 20." In particular, Nour called the recent 60 percent reduction of U.S. aid for democracy promotion in Egypt a "grave" move, and said that a new approach of channeling that aid through the government, rather than sending it directly to NGO-style groups. would be "as if it didn't come" once pocket-lining officials are done with it. The result will be continued state of repression that allows terrorism and extremism to flourish, he warns.
Now it is quite possible that liberals such as Nour are not the best hope for reform in the arab world and that islamic parties are. Nonetheless it is, shall we say, disappointing that the new President, reacting to his predecessor's perceived excessive enthusiasm for democracy promotion, should be moving so far in the other direction. Realism is important, but it's not the only show in town.


Filed under: Democracy (88 more articles) , Egypt (102 more articles) , Obama (355 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (5)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Anthony

June 4th, 2009 12:06am Report this comment

Inclined to agree. It is indeed rather disappointing. There's no point in being naive - it's fairly clear that liberal secularist reformers don't have enough support and a big enough head of steam to make a difference and it's also the case that the Bush admin bungled the democracy promotion angle and that, managed in a cackhanded manner, Western attempts to aid indigenous liberal democrats can have the overall effect of stripping them of domestic legitimacy.*

However, one can acknowledge all of that while still being a little concerned that the message fairly substantial swathes of the bureaucracy and the left wing commentariat increasingly seems to have for third world liberals is "Piss off". And I say this as somebody who stands broadly in the realist tradition in international relations.

ndm

June 4th, 2009 12:24am Report this comment

I think people are making too much of the drop in aid for democracy promotion. There are many ways to promote democracy in a country without direct or indirect funding of political parties.

Steven A. Cook writes in Newsweek:

-- Clumsy democracy promotion often does little good and can even make matters worse—not just in Egypt but in other authoritarian systems resistant to reform. Between 2004 and 2007, the Bush administration increased the share of the economic aid for Egypt it devoted to democracy and governance by 133 percent, from $37 million to $86.5 million—or about a fifth of its entire annual economic-aid package to Cairo. But these raises came at the expense of programs devoted to agriculture, the environment, health care and infrastructure development, which experienced funding cuts ranging from 44 to 100 percent. As a result, some wildly successful programs were eliminated, such as one that helped improve the lot of impoverished rural farmers. In their place, Washington implemented new programs, like one to run political-reform conferences for Egypt's regional governors—a futile endeavor, given that these individuals answer only to Mubarak and that more than half of them are police or military officers.

Regardless of Bush Administration policies on democracy promotion in Egypt the overall policies of the Administration greviously damaged the cause of democracy promotion everywhere.

porkbelly

June 4th, 2009 1:31am Report this comment

But just because Dear Leader Obama (blessings of the House of Saud upon him) is prepared to turn a blind eye to human rights violations abroad, surely he will never crack down on dissent at home. Right?

Bill Markley

June 4th, 2009 1:41am Report this comment

Also, the Obama Administration has insisted that members of the Muslim Brotherhood be invited to Obama's much-heralded speech. For those unfamiliar with the Muslim Brotherhood, they advocate global jihad and sharia law.

Along with many of Obama's actions since becoming president, this is more evidence that he does not value freedom very highly except for himself and his supporters.

peter watkins

June 4th, 2009 12:07pm Report this comment

One human rights abuser at a time.

Today Israel.
Tomorrow other culprits

Its a qustion of priorities.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Search this blog

Alex Massie's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk