Blimey. A new poll asks: "Do you believe that Barack Obama was born in the United States of America or not?"
Just 42% of Republican respondents answer "Yes". 28% say "No" and 30% "Aren't Sure".
As Dave Weigel points out, this is the GOP equivalent of an infamous poll in 2007 which reported that 35% of Democrats suspected that George W Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance.
Enquiring minds want to know, mind you, how many people think Obama was born in Kenya/Indonesia/Wherever and think Dick Cheney blew up the World Trade Center?
I really don't know how one deals with this sort of nuttiness. But I suspect ignoring them may prove more profitable than wasting time denunking the nonsense spouted by people who won't be satisfied, regardless of the absurdity of their claims. As Julian Sanchez argues:
Mainstream outlets may want to reconsider the point at which it’s worth taking up and debunking these sorts of fringe ideas, even at the risk of giving them undeserved exposure. The pattern we’re seeing in the new media environment is that these conspiracy theories end up getting pretty wide exposure anyway, but only taken up by real journalists once there’s a core group who can’t be disabused of their false beliefs without fairly serious threat to their self images, which is the worst of both worlds. The kooky ideas don’t end up being contained by major media’s refusal to take note of them, and the debunking is less effective when they do.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (8)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The tradecraft of Brown's Morgan interview is bizarre - James Forsyth
2 Rationalism enters the climate change debate - Fraser Nelson
3 Beyond doubt - David Blackburn
4 What happens if Labour wins? - David Blackburn
5 What’s needed now is a modern Conservative party with clear, discernible principles - Fraser Nelson
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2010 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
David
July 31st, 2009 4:06pm Report this commentBlimey. What a bunch of morons.
ben
July 31st, 2009 6:51pm Report this commentTo say that Bush had advance knowledge that something 9/11ish was likely to happen is not necessarily to give any credence to the Troofer nonsense.
"During the spring and summer of 2001, U.S. intelligence agencies received a stream of warnings about an attack al Qaeda planned, as one report puts it "something very, very, very big." Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet told us "the system was blinking red.""
ndm
July 31st, 2009 8:29pm Report this commentI suspect a good number of the birthers are too stupid to know that Hawaii is in the United States.
dearieme
July 31st, 2009 10:39pm Report this commentIt's rather odd that the US Constitution requires a President to be a natural born citizen (not, note, that he was born in the US) but sets up no scheme for verifying it.
ndm
August 1st, 2009 2:26am Report this commentdearieme writes:
-- It's rather odd that the US Constitution requires a President to be a natural born citizen (not, note, that he was born in the US) but sets up no scheme for verifying it.
That the US Constution is a compilation of many words with no means of understanding actual intent has kept the Supreme Court in business for a couple of hundred terms. It is also why the "original intent" ideology of the right-wing members of the Court is utterly and completely bogus - and no more than an excuse for them to apply their ideology to any decision they make.
THX1138
August 1st, 2009 7:10am Report this commentOf course the birthers are right, America always employs an illegal alien to clear up the s**t after the party :)
David
August 1st, 2009 7:31am Report this commentThere is a scheme-his birth certificate, which is fine. There's no real contraversy at all, and in fact there was a bigger issue over McCain who was born out side of the US on an army base. Even that was't much of an issue since legally
US army bases are US sovereign territory.
It's just a group of nutters.
Verity
August 2nd, 2009 8:57pm Report this commentFor a more comprehensive and somewhat calmer look at Obama's provenance, read http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMzlmZWFhOTQ3YjUxMDE2YWY4ZDMzZjZlYTVmZmU=&w=MA== The writer thinks there's no question about his birth in Hawaii, but points to other murky facts and downright lies propagated by Obama's people and Obama himself and strange evasions. And what on earth was he doing in Pakistan meeting senior ministers when he was just a state senator? The writer is a Senior Fellow of the National Review.
Lots of suprising facts.
Back to top