No, there's no connection. Liberal Vision's Angela Harbutt has some fun suggesting that the Prince of Darkness has been on manoeuvres again, this time plotting to spring the Lockerbie bomber from his cell in Greenock prison. It runs like this: Peter Mandelson was on Corfu again this summer and there he met Colonel Gaddafi's son. Just days later reports surfaced that Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi might be released. Coincidence? Surely not! Indeed, certainly not!
Now Miss Harbutt is, I assume, not being entirely serious. And nor, I trust, is Tory Bear when he leaps aboard this bandwagon. But doubtless this is the sort of thing that plenty of people are quite happy, even keen, to believe.
So it's worth pointing out that it's nonsense. Just to be on the safe side, you understand. Nonsense, because Mandelson has no power to determine whether Megrahi is released or not. Nor does any politician at Westminster. Equally, the idea that the Lockerbie bomber could be released on compassionate grounds has been around for some time now. Ever since it was determined tht his prostate cancer is terminal, in fact. So Mandelson's discussions on Corfu are entirely irrelevant.
But Megrahi could not be released, even on compassionate grounds, while he was appealling his conviction. He's subsequently dropped that appeal, clearing the way for him to be released on account of his cancer. If you want to find conspiracy theory in any of this then here it is: the Scottish political and legal authorities are happy to release Megrahi on account of his cancer because they feared what might happen if his appeal went ahead and was upheld.
No, I don't suppose this is the real truth either. But, for all that he adds to the political and media classes political entertainment, there are limits to what even Lord Mandelson can achieve behind the scenes.
UPDATE: Magnus Linklater has a scathing assessment of the SNP's handling of the matter.
Filed under: Conspiracy theories (6 more articles) , Mandelson (11 more articles) , Scotland (499 more articles) , Terrorism (298 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (2)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Dougthedug
August 19th, 2009 12:41pm Report this commentThe problem for the "deal" and "conspiracy" theorists is that for a deal to work both sides have to gain. Though both Westminster and Labour might have an interest in the revenue the British Government would accrue from British arms deals and oil exploration in Libya, Holyrood and the SNP have nothing to gain from releasing Megrahi. In addition to that, the SNP and Labour hate each other in Scotland.
There seems to be a lot of confusion in the press about the difference between Holyrood, Westminster, Labour and the SNP and it often seems that the commentators think the SNP is in some way linked to the Westminster Government.
As far as Magnus Linklater's article goes it's the usual mess of prejudice and received wisdom presented as facts.
Kenny MacAskill has said nothing to the press about whether he's "minded", as Magnus puts it, to do anything apart from making a decision by the end of the month.
The media storm has been whipped up by the Conservatives, Lib-Dems and Labour in Scotland who are shamelessly using the deaths over and in Lockerbie to try and gain some political capital out of the affair.
Ben
August 19th, 2009 7:48pm Report this commentDear Alex, a few points:
1. I am a medic. I see plenty of patients with prostate cancer. They may be theoretically terminal, but the reality may be that they survive for many months, or even years. It's not like lung cancer, say. Given the gravity and the controversy of thsi situation, some sort of proof of th medical seriousness is essential. I also live in Scotland, the situation is embarassing for the nation who had to deal with Lockerbie.
2. Terminal illness is not a reason for release/transfer per se. Look elsewhere in British jails. The motive is undoubtedly political
3. You must be kidding if you expect anyone to believe that Mandelson has no influence here. He my be overrated, but it's exactly his style.
4. This, and the pathetic impotent whining about the Scottish budget allocation, are rapidly taking fat Eck's credibilty apart. I've almost forgotten what the normally publicity-hungry boy looks like, I mean, Kenny Macaskill is our international face on this???
Back to top