Vince Cable - Clever Chap; Hopeless Politician

Tuesday, 22nd September 2009

The other thing to be borne in mind about the Liberal Democrats - apart, that is, from the fact that they betray proper liberalism every day - is that they're hopeless at politics. Vince Cable's proposals on freezing public sector pay, reforming pensions and increasing the personal allowance are actually all very sensible. Good policies in fact! Worth talking about!

So what does he do? Only ruin everything by proposing an absurd, back-of-a-napkin plan to tax large houses still further. (That the Lib Dems are, or used to be becauses, really, who can tell these days, in favour of replacing property taxes with a local income tax merely adds to the absurdity of the situation.) So, guess what gets the headlines? Surprisingly it's not the sensible ideas.

This is elementary.

Meanwhile, it seems that Chris Huhne has decided that it's probably not a great idea to call the Tories Nazis. His speech was originally going to contain a line arguing that William Hague is "a skinhead who has gone round the beer cellars of Europe and come up with the dregs".

That's been dropped but, according to Nick Clegg's chief-of-staff:

"Chris Huhne is making an important point about the other parties with whom the Conservatives have chosen to associate in the European Parliament. There was a line in an early draft, and I think he decided that the substance of that was important, not getting into a discussion about William Hague's hairstyle or his drinking habits."

Really? Someday someone will explain why it matters who sits alongside the Tories in the European Parliament. Granted, there are an awful lot of euronuts out there (on both sides of the argument) but no normal person gives a damn about it. And anyway, since Vladimir Zhirinovsky was (perhaps still is?) a member of the Liberal International it's not obvious that the Lib Dems are in any position to hurl rocks at anyone else on this matter.

One final thought: if there's a hung parliament the Liberal Democrats shouldn't do a deal with anyone. There's something to be said for minority government after all. Most bills only cause more trouble and passing bills only encourages politicians to pass more legislation.

Which in turn reminds me of one of my pet notions: you should have to repeal an existing (and applied) law each time you want to pass a new one. That would help concentrate minds. And, of course, permit a proper debate on which laws we really don't need.

Filed under: Lib Dems (101 more articles) , Tories (273 more articles)

Previous Back to Alex Massie Next

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (9)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Post comment

Patricia Shaw

September 22nd, 2009 2:01pm Report this comment

So the character assassination starts in earnest. Liddle first, then Massie, and so the treatment starts. Lovely.

Rhoda Klapp

September 22nd, 2009 2:47pm Report this comment

Patricia, Vince was acting stupid before the Spectator picked him up on it. He is in a party whose highest ambition is to sell its support to the highest bidder in the event of a close election, like a prostitute choosing between two clients. My only problem with Massie, Liddle and the Spec is the amount of attention given to these non-entities.

Prodicus

September 22nd, 2009 3:00pm Report this comment

So, um, why does the LibDemConf agenda bill this rant as a speech on housing? Anyone?

daniel maris

September 22nd, 2009 11:05pm Report this comment

I don't think you can say the Lib Dems are useless at politics. They have increased their representation in parliament by a factor of three over the last 25 years. Most parties would be fairly satisfied with that sort of record I would say.

Whether you should vote for them is an entirely different question of course. The Lib Dems seem actually rather unadventurous in their thinking for a third party would be my analysis.