Monday 6 September 2010

Jobs at Telegraph

Does Obama Care About Human Rights in Iran?

Tuesday, 6th October 2009

As readers know, in general terms I think the Obama administration has taken a fairly sensible, moderate approach towards Iran. Nevertheless, it's possible to take this too far. And this seems, on the face of it, to be one example of when carefulness crosses the line and becomes craven:

For the past five years, researchers in a modest office overlooking the New Haven green have carefully documented cases of assassination and torture of democracy activists in Iran. With more than $3 million in grants from the US State Department, they have pored over thousands of documents and Persian-language press reports and interviewed scores of witnesses and survivors to build dossiers on those they say are Iran’s most infamous human-rights abusers.

But just as the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center was ramping up to investigate abuses of protesters after this summer’s disputed presidential election, the group received word that - for the first time since it was formed - its federal funding request had been denied.

Formed by two exiled Iranians in 2004 with a $1 million grant from the State Department, the center...has published 12 reports in English and Persian about the forced confessions of detained bloggers and journalists, the 1988 massacre of thousands of political prisoners, and the Iranian government’s campaign to assassinate dissidents abroad. Although the State Department has been the group’s main source of funds, the Canadian government granted it money to research human-rights abuses in the wake of the disputed election this year.

Currently, the group is working to develop a list of all those who were arrested following the election and a list of those responsible for alleged abuses in prison. But without additional funding, the group will shut down in May when its funding runs out...

There are excellent reasons for not being seen to fund opposition groups inside Iran since American funding can only prejudice their cause. But this seems a rather different matter. Perhaps there's an innocent explanation but if so it would be good to hear it. Because otherwise this looks shabby and, actually, terrible. Realism is fine but realism doesn't have to be granite-hearted to the point it becomes embarrassed by talk of human rights and the careful documentation of such abuses.

UPDATE: The Senate, thanks in part to John McCain and others, is trying to insist upon funding for this sort of work.


Filed under: Foreign Policy (157 more articles) , Human Rights (9 more articles) , Iran (82 more articles) , Obama (265 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (10)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Egypt Steve

October 6th, 2009 6:41pm Report this comment

Documenting torture and human-rights-abuses is nothing but the politics of revenge. I say, let's not criminalize policy choices. let's look forward, not backward. Let's not tear the country apart. It wasn't torture, only "enhanced interrogation," and whatever happened was done by a few bad apples on the night shift. The leaders acted in good faith to protect the country. Don't destroy the morale of the security forces the Iranians need to keep themselves Safe.

ndm

October 6th, 2009 6:55pm Report this comment

I suspect the innocent explanation lies in this paragraph of the story:

-- The job of doling out money to groups seeking to influence Iran has been shifted from the State Department’s Near Eastern Affairs Bureau to a lower-profile division, its US Agency for International Development. USAID spokesman Harry Edwards did not provide an explanation of why funding was denied for the Human Rights Documentation Center, widely seen as the most comprehensive clearing house of documents related to human rights abuses in Iran. He said the government’s funding priorities have not changed.

And to be honest, recording the details of every human-rights victim in Iran might be good for the soul but it might not be the best use of a limited democracy-promotion budget.

porkbelly

October 6th, 2009 9:14pm Report this comment

Yes, the limited budget for encouraging democracy and human rights must of course be spent where the situation is most grave. That would be Honduras, then?

ndm

October 6th, 2009 9:30pm Report this comment

porkbelly -

We can't tell from the article how money is being spent on democracy promotion in Iran because the author of the original article didn't tell us. The article had all the look of, because it was, a plea from an organization seeking to replace lost funding. The Iranian community in the US is sufficiently wealthy that I doubt it would have much trouble ponying up $3M if it really thought this particular use of it to be worthwhile.

Now it could be that this effort is a particularly worthwhile venture but it is naive to view it in isolation from other efforts which is precisely what the people running the venture want us to do. Theirs are the same gripes we hear whenever a favourite arts company loses government funding.

porkbelly

October 6th, 2009 9:50pm Report this comment

ndm - Place this story in the context of Obama's shameful silence on Iranian human rights abuses - the executions, rapes, torture - as well as the stolen election, and then compare his State Department's bizarrely heavy-handed attempt to re-install the proto-Chavez Zelaya in Honduras and I think a pattern emerges. For America's enemies: a box of chocolates. For America's friends: the boot.

Doubtless the administration is hiding behind the tired old excuse that by supporting the Iranian opposition we somehow taint and devalue them - that was the what we were told was wrong with Reagan's support for Solidarity, remember? Only it emerged that oppressive regimes' lack of support from their own people was and is their Achilles Heel. This is where the West can actually apply pressure to the Iranian government - everyone knows that real sanctions will never happen. So why willingly abandon the one real tool we have (which also happens to be the decent, moral thing to do)? It is as baffling as it is sickening.

The Masked Marvel

October 7th, 2009 3:30am Report this comment

Not really, no.

Since when did Marxists ever value human life?

Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi

October 7th, 2009 7:57am Report this comment

Mr. Obama/State Dept. advisors are some of the most objectionable Iranians who are notorious regime apologists. We Iranians have repeatedly pointed this out to this administration and many in the Democratic side of the isle, only to fall on deaf ears. When Mr. Obama choses to willfully turn a blind eye to the fervent protests of the Iranian people and accommodate a hollow regime of thugs and sociopaths, it's no wonder that he would take a step such as this to appease them.

alex

October 8th, 2009 5:47pm Report this comment

No problem,let new administration cut the funds,Iranian outside will contribute be assure at the end it will be more than 3million.just make good and effective annoncement.for example in bbc persian or voa persian.

Jay

October 8th, 2009 8:56pm Report this comment

Thank you for covering this, but I believe the real title should have "Does Obama care about Human Rights?"

In addition to cutting this funding, Obama refused to see Dalai Laama, the very symbol of peace and tolerance. He's now the first president since Bush 41 who did so.

As time passes the true face of this president is revealing itself more and more: someone who either is not willing or does not have the will to stand for the right issues.

I'm ashamed to say I voted for him.

Someone

October 8th, 2009 10:17pm Report this comment

Take a look at the National Iranian American Council blog's take on this issue: http://niacblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/state-department-cuts-ihrdc-funding/

I think they have a point.

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Search this blog

Alex Massie's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique