![]()
James Cameron's mega-blockbuster Avatar seems destined to win the Oscars for Best Picture and Best Director (as well as the technical awards). Peter Suderman explains why:
So despite its genuinely impressive technical innovations, Avatar isn't much a movie: Instead, Cameron's cooked up a derivative, overlong pastiche of anti-corporate clichés and quasi-mystical eco-nonsense. It's not that the film's politics make it bad, it's that even if you agree, the nearly three-hour onslaught of simplistic moralizing leaves no room for interesting twists or ambiguity in the story or characters: corporations are bad, scientists are good, natives are pure, harmony with nature is the ultimate ideal — the only suspense comes from wondering what movie Cameron will rip off next. The go-to comparison so far is Dances With Wolves meets Ferngully, and that's just about right. But Cameron rips himself off considerably as well: There are gruff marines are straight out of Aliens, stubborn science-types pulled from The Abyss, and a love-across-the-boundaries romance that echoes Titanic — only this time, it's across species rather than ship decks.
All of which, while entirely unsurprising, makes it sound more like a musn't-see than a can't-miss extravaganza.
Filed under: Cinema (67 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (13)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
THX1138
December 18th, 2009 11:13pm Report this commentI saw it at the IMAX yesterday and it's AMAZING !! - Believe the hype, this movie delivers.
Fergus Pickering
December 19th, 2009 4:29am Report this commentLooks good, sounds crap, is that the size of it? Hardly for grown-ups then? Tell me that I'm wrong, good Numberplate. Tell me about the PLOT. Also tell me if it has any good jokes. The first two Star Wars movies had jokes. After that they didn't and they were rubbish. So jokes are the thing. Tell me about the jokes.
Mark
December 19th, 2009 10:40am Report this commentI'm going purely for the spectacle. I'm hoping there's some way I can disconnect my brain from the plot...
Jeremy
December 19th, 2009 11:20am Report this commentHorrible, fat, overblown pap - in brief, a James Cameron film...
Jeremy
December 19th, 2009 1:00pm Report this commentPeter Suderman:
"....the nearly three-hour onslaught of simplistic moralizing leaves no room for interesting twists or ambiguity in the story or characters: corporations are bad, scientists are good, natives are pure, harmony with nature is the ultimate ideal — the only suspense comes from wondering what movie Cameron will rip off next..."
This tendancy, that you note, to seperate individuals and groups into a simplistic good/bad dichotomy is what really offends about mainstream Hollywood cinema. There is simply no room for complexity, subtlety or nuance. The impression one gains from these films is of an entire culture which has been arrested at the infantile stage of development.
Peter Crawford
December 19th, 2009 3:50pm Report this commentFergus P - If you are after jokes (and who isn't) then don't go. There are no jokes. Unless you count the film as one big one. Spectacular visuals are not enough to sustain interest in limp, cliched, platitudinous, drivel for three long hours.
Tim InSingapore
December 19th, 2009 5:03pm Report this commentI've just seen it. Sure the plot is cliche ridden, but the spectacle is ... spectacular, and the 3D effects exceeded my expectations by a big margin. For what it is, it's extremely well done and will be seen as a technical landmark. Some of the comments above are the purest snobbery - there are many drearier and less innovative films that get the thumbs up from the 'informed film-goer'. It's definitely worth seeing, rather contrary to my expectations. I hated Titanic, for example ...
Fergus Pickering
December 19th, 2009 5:12pm Report this commentThank you, Peter Crawford. I suspected as much. I mean green blokes ten feet high - and not one of them Arnie.
Peter Crawford
December 19th, 2009 6:19pm Report this commentFergus - no probs. And your mention of Arnie reminds me that in the Cameron directed Terminator movies there is a slight hint of dark humour that peps them up no end.
Tim - I am not a snob. And the visuals are stunning. But stunning visuals on their own are simply not enough for me.
Each to his own but I thought it was lame.
Rhoda Klapp
December 19th, 2009 9:48pm Report this commentWould commenters please make sure they distinguish which Cameron they are discussing, Dave or James. One has a wierd fantasy of a wonderful green planet where idealistic creatures live in harmony, the other...well, you can see how this is going.
AHM in NY
December 20th, 2009 12:42am Report this commentThis film was visually amazing. There were, in fact, a few jokes. But overall, I have to say that this film has something for everybody. The theme is beautiful, the characters I found were developed to evoke feeling in the viewer and the story was well told. I have to politely disagree with all the reviews above, as I found this movie to be spectacular. It is a must-see, even if you're not interested in Sci-fi or action films. Unless you're a stuck up, nick-picker who has nothing better to do than to b**tch about an obvious masterpiece, I think you will like it, if not love it.
Fergus Pickering
December 20th, 2009 11:16am Report this commentSorry, AHM, I will bitch about an obvious glugger as long as I like. And will I go and see it? I will not. However, each to his own. One of my favourite kidie movies fifteen years ago was a Rik Mayall one about snot which got dreadful reviews. However my daughters and I, we just fell about. It seems to me that this director peaked with his real masterpiece 'Terminator' and it's been a long road downhill ever since. I think the troubole is that he's a deeply stupid man and that always trips you up in the end.
Beefeater
December 20th, 2009 6:36pm Report this commentCameron captures the imagination, then tortures and kills it.
Back to top