Actually, there seem to be rather more than six promises Still, the Daily Mail reports on a series of Tory pledges that Dave & Co will roll out this weekend as part of their Get Back on Track plan. Let's have a look at them:
Tim Montgomerie seems impressed by this and he's more in touch with Tory grass-roots than I am. Nevertheless, while this may please the party base (not, incidentally, an ignoble objective) those of us less in hock to the party can be forgiven for asking: Is this it?Act now on debt to get the economy moving:
Deal with the deficit more quickly than Labour so that mortgage rates stay lower for longer with the Conservatives.Get Britain working by boosting enterprise:
Cut corporation tax rates, abolish taxes on the first ten jobs created by new businesses, promote green jobs and get people off welfare and into work.Make Britain the most family-friendly country in Europe:
Freeze council tax and raise the basic state pension, recognise marriage in the tax system and back couples in the benefits system, support young families with extra health visitors, and fight back against crime.Back the NHS:
Increase spending on health every year; and make the NHS work for patients not managers.Raise standards in schools:
Give teachers the power to restore discipline and create new smaller schools.Change politics:
Reduce the number of MPs, cut Whitehall and quangos by a third, and let taxpayers see where their money is spent.
Because what we have here is a) a pledge to act on the deficit that is accompanied by b) tax cuts and c) a raft of commitments to increased spending. If a) is the most important thing then how can b) and, especially, c) be sensible? All of these, remember, are billed as "immediate" changes that will be the first items on a Tory government's agenda.
Some of this is obviously a matter of political necessity. And not all of it is bad. It's sensible, for instance, to link the impact of the deficit to real-life concerns and stress that it's not simply a matter of esoteric accountacy. Cutting cororation tax is no bad thing either.
However, assuming the Mail is right, what we also have is massive commitments to spending increases - on pensions, on health, on schools (more schools = more money) and, implicitly, policing. And that's before you talk about tax breaks for married couples and the rest of it. So which budgets get cut and which taxes are going to rise? Because something, surely, has to give.
Of course this is nit-picking. On the one had the Tories are criticised when they stay quiet and then any tme they actually make some pledges, the nature of those promises simply invites additional questions. But that's the nature of the game and the way it's played.
And, looking at all this in terms of philosophy and consistency rather than from a purely political standpoint, there's at least one terrible promise here that contradicts the Tories' interesting, promising, commitment to localism and decentralisation. That's the commitment to freeze council tax. I've no doubt that this is politically savvy and likely to be popular but it's a rotten idea nonetheless. How serious can the Tories be about decentralisation when they seem to want to make local government more not less dependent upon central government? Where's the accountability and transparency in that? Nowhere, that's where.
Look, David Cameron can hardly be a worse Prime Minister than Gordon Brown but I'm not convinced that a combination of reducing revenue*, increasing spending and contradicting at least part of what's supposed to be your Big Idea is really terribly encouraging or magnificently sensible, regardless of the political imperatives that demand all of this.
*In the short-term anyway.
Filed under: 2010 Election (77 more articles) , Cameron (208 more articles) , Localism (57 more articles) , Public spending (120 more articles) , Tax (118 more articles) , Tories (265 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (9)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
3 Storm in an Indian teacup - Daniel Korski
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Herbert Thornton
February 27th, 2010 1:00am Report this commentPeripheral stuff.
Nothing whatsoever about stopping immigration, nothing about deporting Islamic clerics who preach inflammatory sermons and recruit jihadists, and nothing about the abandonment of British sovereignty and its replacement by bureaucratic, totalitarian style, politically correct government from Europe.
The Tories might just as well be running for the jobs of Mayors and Councillors.
Rhoda Klapp
February 27th, 2010 7:53am Report this commentNot impressed, they've been a lousy opposition, they don't carry enough credibility to convince that they will be able to implement even this inadequate programme, and the important bits are missing.
No principle is evident except 'our turn to eat'.
paulg
February 27th, 2010 8:19am Report this commentIf you tax less you stimulate demand, hence tax revenue grows,a knock on effect kicks in,it basic economics. Economics people can understand and relate too.
Paul
February 27th, 2010 8:30am Report this commentYou big copier!http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2010/02/27/sir-massies-been-copying-again-sir/
Elliot Fullwood
February 27th, 2010 10:06am Report this commentThere is a large and growing feeling that the Conservatives are no different to Labour now and have dumped fundamental principles. It is for this reason I am standing as an Independent Candidate in Chelsea and Fulham for the election.
www.elliotfullwood.com
Noa Zrk
February 27th, 2010 5:00pm Report this commentHerbert - absolutely right.
Elliot - good luck - I assume you are indifferent to the loss of your deposit.
Will J
February 27th, 2010 6:48pm Report this commentWe should find it more odd that at a time when great questions of national identity and sovereignty stand in urgent need of attention a party aspiring to national government runs on a platform of schools and hospitals. But we're so used to it now. Regardless of what they say to get into power, the next government should devolve schools and hospitals to local government where they belong, and concentrate on genuinely national issues, not least of which are issues of nationhood.
Ben Smith
February 28th, 2010 9:49pm Report this commentWill Mr. Cameron be putting fuel tax back to 17.5% will he be closing hospital wards, and all the new hospitals and health centres that labour introduced will he remove the O.A.P. T.V. Licence. and Winter fuel allowance, and give the over eighties an increase on their 25p. I dont think there is a great deal of difference between any of the parties, but I shall be definitely voting Labour. better the enemy you know.
djw2009
March 2nd, 2010 12:22am Report this commentActually, the council tax freeze, while totally too timid, is the best part of this package of warmed-up socialism. Because as Alex Massie knows local government democracy is simply a joke - there are too many people on benefits who don't pay council tax (remember the Community Charge?) and who therefore can willy nilly vote to spend more, and there is no genuine accountability of the scroungers who work in the council, with their inflated salaries and pensions. My solution: abolish council tax, and make all councils live within the existing block grant. This would be around a 16% cut in spending, but would mean that all council tax payers stopped being SHAFTED. Freezing council tax Dave is not enough - that's why I will not be voting for a pinko like you.
Back to top