Subscribe to The Spectator

Monday 21 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

The DNA Database Con

Tuesday, 9th March 2010

What the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee gives with one hand:

"The current situation of indefinite retention of the DNA profiles of those arrested but not convicted is impossible to defend in light of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights and unacceptable in principle," the committee says in a report published on 8 March 2010. [Emphasis added]
It takes away with the other:
Although the committee does not want a return to the pre-2004 situation of DNA being collected only on charging and not on arrest, it says that it should be easier for those wrongly arrested or who have volunteered their DNA to get their records removed from the database.
Sigh. So it's the storing and not the collecting that is unacceptable? Half a pie is better than no pie, I suppose.

As for the crime-solving utility of DNA (in England and Wales)? Not so useful after all. Just 0.3% of solved crimes depend, even partially, upon the use of stored DNA profiles. Not nothing! But not much either. Of course this figure might be higher if there was a compulsory, unavoidable database wouldn't it? (This is not an argument for any such expansion.) So, it seems that although the authorities will continue to insist that all this is vital it really, actually, is not.

[Thanks to Big Brother Watch for the tip]


Filed under: Britain (737 more articles) , Civil liberties (52 more articles) , Crime (260 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (1)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Ruairidh

March 9th, 2010 9:11pm Report this comment

Be fair. This % represents 3666 crimes that would not be solved by other means and fails to record circa 30000 other crimes where the DNA provides further evidence against someone already a suspect who may not otherwise be convicted.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Search this blog

Alex Massie's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk