This was hardly a vintage debate even if it is increasingly clear that these men have little regard for one another and that both Cameron and, especially, Brown are irritated by Nick Clegg's stickability.
This was actually Clegg's weakest performance. After a good start and the best of the opening statements, Clegg's performance was less focused, less detailed, less persuasive any time he moved away from the Lib Dems' flagship proposal to raise the income tax threshold to £10,000. That may not matter much since this policy has the great advantage of being popular and easy to understand. Elsewhere, Clegg retreated to a cheap populism on bankers bonuses and the like that didn't persuade me of his seriousness even if I suspect it probably pleased many viewers. On the other hand he scored well when pointing out the madness of a tax credit system that hands money to the wealthy. It's a shame, mind you, that he didn't point out that his policy on illegal immigrants is more or less the same as Ronald Reagan's. Then again, that might lose him support in a British election...
If Clegg was weaker this week Cameron was stronger. This was, by some distance, his best performance and he did enough to finish the winner on my scorecard. This had less to do with his advocacy of Conservative policies - by now we all know what their plans are - but because, at last, he offered an effective rebuttal to Gordon Brown's near-endless supply of half-truths, absurdities and outright falsehoods.
Just as well, since if Gordon had been able to get away with his "cutting taxes takes money out of the economy" line one more time the frustration would have been too much to bear and god knows what might have happened. Happily it was at last pointed out that this is nonsense and not before time, either. Then there was Brown's bewildering claim that cutting corporation tax means "taking money away from manufacturing industry." I confess I have no idea what that means or how he can think this but since he said it more than once I assume it's what he really does believe. Which is troubling. Anyway, Cameron was right to point out that, contrary to Brown's insinuation, he wasn't proposing tax cuts for banks alone. Everyone would benefit.
But this was typical of Brown's performance. Lost in a blizzard of his own statistics, I'm not sure I've ever seen such a negative performance from a major political figure in any debate. Ever. One struggle to recall a single positive thing Brown aid or a single moment in which he talked about his plans for the future. Instead it was a scaremongering performance designed to put the fear of god into anyone rash enough to contemplate endorsing either the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats. His closing statement was typical: risk, fear, risk, fear, risk, fear and not a single positive reason to vote Labour. It's as though Labour has given up and retreated to a strategy of playing only to its base as a means of trying to motivate the hardcore to make it to the polls next week.
Perhaps one can admire the Great Clunking Fist's resilience but that's about it given his cavalier disregard for the truth and his quite shocking claim that "I do know how to run the economy in good times and bad". The sad thing is that the poor man probably believes this.
So, Cameron's best performance, Clegg's weakest and Brown's, well, oddest. If I were scoring it in debating terms I think I'd go for Cameron 80 Clegg 76 Brown 74.
PS: For an American take on matters see James Fallows at the Atlantic and Hendrik Hertzberg at the New Yorker. Rather to my surprise, they seem quite impressed by the standard of these debates. Also, as usual, I recommend the views of the panel at Election Debates even if one judge, bafflingly in my view, has scored the contest in Brown's favour;
Filed under: Brown (180 more articles) , Cameron (227 more articles) , Clegg (61 more articles) , Debates (25 more articles) , Election 2010 (599 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (5)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Snowman
April 29th, 2010 11:06pm Report this commentFor my money, Alex, no real winner. What it needed were some catchy, easily remembered phrases on at least the key questions; I couldn't repeat any of it even if my life depended on it. Cleggy got the closest at the beginning, lost the plot towards the end, Dave came distant second. The difficulty for Brown was that one couldn’t warm up to him at all, and on top of it there sat his grin. Why didn’t someone tell him to drop it?
Ruby Duck
April 30th, 2010 12:04am Report this commentTiming is everything, Alex. Cameron showed his steel when it really mattered.
Dave may be accused of being Blair-lite, but the man who's been studying Blair's mannerisms was standing in the middle.
Peter From Maidstone
April 30th, 2010 8:19am Report this commentAlex, tax credits are not 'handing money to the rich'. It is THEIR money already. You show your socialist tendencies because you do think that not taking people's money from them is the same as giving them money.
THX1138
April 30th, 2010 8:23am Report this commentFor another "American take on these matters" and the pathetic tame-ness of British political scandal, take a look at wot Jon Stewart has to say: http://bit.ly/dA5lbi
Ben G
April 30th, 2010 9:15am Report this commentOverwhelming sense of relief - at last our man has shown he can do it.
Odd performance by Clegg - I suspect a tactical decision to go for the Labour vote after Duffy-gate, and so secure 2nd place.
Back to top