I don't think this is a very good idea:
I suppose it's possible that this might resurrect Labour's fortunes but it seems unlikely. And that's partly because Labour have run such a drab, dreary, depressing campaign. Their principle approach to policy has been to thieve stuff from the SNP and rewrap it in Labour cloth, trusting that voters will think it belonged to Labour all along. At no point has Labour made much of a positive case for themselves.Senior staffers in Ed Miliband’s office started briefing Scottish hacks last night that Miliband is now going to take a much more "hands on" approach to the campaign. Miliband has only made one, brief appearance in the campaign so far. But he and Ed Balls are due to be in Scotland this week to push a more strident "anti-independence" message.
That being so, it seems strange to conclude Labour's problem is that it hasn't been negative enough or has just targetted the wrong people. Apparently so:
I don't understand this either. Labour tried this in 2007 and it didn't work then. Why should it work now? Everyone knows that this isn't an election about independence so, presumably, Labour are targetting easily-scared simpletons. No surprise there. Perhaps this is a big enough slice of the electorate to make a difference come polling day but even if so it's not an especially edifying approach to take.In another desperate attempt to rescue the campaign, Scottish Labour today re-launched its campaign, ditching the theme of "vote Labour to oppose Tory cuts," for a relentless anti-independence barrage.
Because, again, independence is irrelevant. Everyone knows that there's a "referendum lock" protecting the Union. That's when the matter will, one day, be decided. All a Holyrood election can do is alter the political calculations governing when and in what circumstances such a referendum might be held (the legal matter is a different one and it's not obvious Holyrood has the power to legislate for such a plebiscite).
If this is the best Labour have to offer - Miliband, Balls and a bogus anti-independence brief - then, crivvens, they're in worse shape than I'd thought possible. A cheery thought, for once.
Filed under: Holyrood 2011 (20 more articles) , Labour (2136 more articles) , Scotland (500 more articles) , SNP (219 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (6)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The unions versus the Department for Education — continued - Peter Hoskin
2 Why reason doesn’t apply to the Eurozone - Fraser Nelson
3 Cameron can no longer laugh off Ed - James Forsyth
4 The unions' lazy opposition to schools reform - Peter Hoskin
5 The strains on the Cameron-Hilton relationship - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
CassiusClaymore
April 26th, 2011 2:22pm Report this commentNot a great strategy, particularly given that they have the numpty vote secured already. Getting a whole load of different English people (Miliband, Balls, Izzard, etc.) to tell us all how misguided we are hasn't worked before (the Tories have done it to death), and it won't work this time either. Hope will beat fear.
The fact that not even Jim Murphy has put an appearance in should be enough to confirm that Grey is doomed.
CC
TrevorsDen
April 26th, 2011 2:42pm Report this commentThe story is hilarious. Labours idea of devolution is their nice Scottish poodle doing what national Labour say.
I do wonder of some measure of true devolution including an English parliament could be linked to Lords Reform.
veryuglybloke
April 26th, 2011 5:31pm Report this commentWhy change the campaign? Just carry on as is and fiddle the ballots. That's what they did last time when 140,000 votes were rejected and numbers of ballot boxes and registers somehow got mislaid. In any case, if labour do well they can always count on support from the tories - they mostly vote together at Holyrood.
A Brown
April 26th, 2011 9:24pm Report this comment'In any case, if labour do well they can always count on support from the tories - they mostly vote together at Holyrood.'
The tories have supported every SNP budget.
Johnyogibair'd
April 26th, 2011 11:35pm Report this commentRepackaged policies...ah the council tax freeze (Labour voted against this 4 times), or the 25,000 apprentice places (again voted against by Labour. They really have lost the plot especially when it came to a socially responsible policy in getting big supermarkets to pay their fair share. Again voted against presumably because it was an SNP idea but possibly due to the huge donations to Labour from certain retailers.
Tom Round
April 27th, 2011 8:31pm Report this comment> ‘Everyone knows that there's a "referendum lock" protecting the Union’
A “Barrier Act” http://tinyurl.com/3fzrshu, if you will.
Back to top