This, Watson, is the salient fact to be gleaned from the stramash over International Development funding. There is nothing especially wrong with aspiring* to spend 0.7% of GDP on overseas aid but it's wrong to legislate to make this a legal requirement. Wrong because government should not try to tie the hands of or otherwise control their successors. Sure, Messrs Blair and Brown may have done this to Dave and the Gang but, as even a cursory acquaintance with the Good Book should remind them, that's no excuse for doing likewise to their own descendents.
Similarly, of course, putting the so-called "Military Covenant" into law is a Bad Idea.If Dr Fox weren't so enthused by his own ill-judged piece of symbolic claptrap he'd have a better case for opposing the similarly ill-judged pieces of claptrap favoured by other departments.
At this point I think I should also make it clear that Dr Fox's lawyers become most upset when anyone suggests his office or people enjoy leaking letters he's sent to the Prime Minister. I make no such claim nor even the tiniest inference that this could have happened on this occasion and want to make it quite plain to the good Doctor and his learned friends that I've not the faintest idea who leaked this letter.
*The politics of this are not difficult. Of course it's ridiculous to spare DFD when other departments are having their budgets cut. Of course foreign aid is unpopular. That's why the policy will endure. It's not considered unpopular enough to cost the Conservatives very many vote but it is believed to be a powerful symbol demonstrating that the Tories really have "changed". This has value even if many of the people most impressed by boosting DFID's budget will never, ever vote Tory. It's not really a policy meant for them either.
Filed under: Britain (738 more articles) , Cameron (227 more articles) , International development (69 more articles) , Liam Fox (135 more articles) , MoD (18 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (3)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The unions versus the Department for Education — continued - Peter Hoskin
2 Why reason doesn’t apply to the Eurozone - Fraser Nelson
3 Cameron can no longer laugh off Ed - James Forsyth
4 The unions' lazy opposition to schools reform - Peter Hoskin
5 The strains on the Cameron-Hilton relationship - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Tom B
May 17th, 2011 12:09pm Report this commentOverseas aid is a racket. Quite apart from the immorality of taking money from taxpayers to pay to people with whom they may have no sympathy, it also distorts and deranges local markets, helps to prop up often venal and corrupt regimes. The late Peter Bauer, a fine economist, debunked the whole structure of government-to-government aid.
Time to scrap it and focus on the core responsibilities of government.
Axstane
May 17th, 2011 12:59pm Report this commentWe borrow the money to give away in aid.
Johnnydub
May 17th, 2011 3:50pm Report this commentAlso why are we giving money to Pakistan when they now have over 100 nuclear bombs and are furiously trying to build another hundred?
Back to top