Perhaps the most horrific battle of them all began 70 years ago today. Here's Orwell:
Things to note:The Germans invaded the U.S.S.R. this morning.Everyone greatly excited. It is universally assumed that this development is to our advantage. It is only so, however, if the Russians actually intend to fight back and can put up a serious resistance, if not enough to halt the Germans, at any rate enough to wear down their air force and navy. Evidently the immediate German objective is not either territory or oil, but simply to wipe out the Russian air force and thus remove a danger from their rear while they deal finally with England. Impossible to guess what kind of show the Russians can put up. The worst omen is that the Germans would probably not have attempted this unless certain that they can bring it off, and quite rapidly at that.
1) Orwell would have written a blog, not a diary (or perhaps in addition to a diary) had such things existed then.
2) He's instinctively contrarian. The majority think this; this may well be proved mistaken. This suits 1) above.
3) Sometimes the majority are actually right. This was one such instance and Orwell was wrong.
4) Orwell's pessimism looks daft now; it was not necessarily so at the time.
5) A diary, like a blog, is a contemporary account of events. A single entry ought best, where possible, be considered in the context of the broader, greater narrative. A snapshot at any one time is useful but also, often, misleading.
6) Most of us could probably use a little more doubt in our writing.
7) Blogs will be an amazing resource for historians compiling histories of the 21st century.
Filed under: Blogging (11 more articles) , George Orwell (5 more articles) , Russia (101 more articles) , World War 2 (72 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (4)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The unions versus the Department for Education — continued - Peter Hoskin
2 Why reason doesn’t apply to the Eurozone - Fraser Nelson
3 Cameron can no longer laugh off Ed - James Forsyth
4 The unions' lazy opposition to schools reform - Peter Hoskin
5 The strains on the Cameron-Hilton relationship - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Rhoda Klapp
June 22nd, 2011 10:37am Report this commentIt is apparent that neither the majority nor Orwell quite grasped that this part of the war was more important than all the rest put together. The Eastern front WAS WW2. And strngley he allows no consideration that the German aim was to destroy communism and remove the threat from the East, that it was both ideological and racial, in addition to the search for lebensraum and raw materials. Orwell's pessimism doesn't look daft to me, the Germans only failed by a whisker. Indeed were it not for the sideshow in the Balkans, they might have started earlier and taken Moscow before the autumn rains.
But on your basic premise, how nice it would be to read Orwell's blog. But remember, there would be no collections of diaries and letters of historical figures, we would have to reconstruct their lives from their twitter. Those who twitter would be well advised to leave only good stuff for posterity.
Sam Davidson
June 22nd, 2011 12:09pm Report this commentSomething like this perhaps;
@GeorgeOrwell Off to the barricades, waistcoat unbuttoned.
normanc
June 22nd, 2011 12:35pm Report this commentI don't see where Orwell is wrong anywhere.
The Germans were supremely confident they could pull it off
One strong kick and the whole rotten edifice will collapse - Hitler
It is no exageration to say the war has been won in 6 weeks - Jodl
Guderian and others dismissed as fantasy the reports they received of the number of tanks the Soviet Union had.
ndm
June 22nd, 2011 6:25pm Report this commentI believe Orwell to be somewhat overrated. A couple of very important novels with a bunch of very minor ones (several with the same sex scene in the woods).
As an essayist, he was tedious to the point of boredom. His essays have nothing of the light contained in those of Albert Camus - who had both a real war and, in the phrasing of the obituary, a good war.
But neither Orwell nor Camus saw the war that Vasily Grossman saw. As a journalist, Grossman reported on the Battle of Stalingrad as it happened, and then followed the Soviet troops to Berlin. This included their arrival at what he described as the "Hell of Treblinka." This journalism is available in the book "Writer at War: Vasily Grossman with the Red Army, 1941-1945." As a novelist, Grossman wrote about the Battle of Stalingrad and the fate of Russian Jewry in his epic novel "Life and Fate."
Orwell's war was different from that of Camus and Grossman. His was as a commentator in a land under attack but not under occupation. Both Camus and Grossman, were journalists in lands not merely under attack but under occupation.
Back to top