Drivel, of course, and the kind of thing you'd expect to find in the Guardian. One expects rather more from the Times but, nay, here is a piece of Simon Winchester's column (£) today:
The State’s founder, Kim Il Sung, claimed that all he wanted for North Korea was to be socialist, and to be left alone. In that regard, the national philosophy of self-reliance known in North Korea as “Juche” is little different from India’s Gandhian version known as “swadeshi”. Just let us get on with it, they said, and without interference, please.
I'm not sure I've read a more revolting pair of paragraphs this year. Just gawp at the casual glibness of waving aside the horrors of a gulag-famine state in this fashion, all so the world-weary "romantic" can be cheered-up by the refreshing local colour that makes North Korea so charmingly unique.India’s attempt to go it alone failed. So, it seems, has Burma’s. Perhaps inevitably, North Korea’s attempt appears to be tottering. But seeing how South Korea has turned out — its Koreanness utterly submerged in neon, hip-hop and every imaginable American influence, a romantic can allow himself a small measure of melancholy: North Korea, for all its faults, is undeniably still Korea, a place uniquely representative of an ancient and rather remarkable Asian culture. And that, in a world otherwise rendered so bland, is perhaps no bad thing.
And, as a commenter at Samizdata notes, it's not as though Winchester's hideous admiration for North Korea qua Korean culture is in any way accurate either. There's precious little "authentically" Korean about the Kims' dreadful totalitarian prison. Most of it is borrowed from the USSR and China, albeit then lacquered in the vulgar Pyongyang style.
Mick Hartley makes the other point: Better a starving slave state, it seems, than this ghastly modern Americanised culture. Quite.
Newspapers, of course, are free to publish whatever they like but one does wonder if anyone at the Times paused to think, "Hang on, we don't have to publish a piece that doesn't just defend the Kims from their detractors but actually makes some kind of fucking "case" for them."
Plucky little North Korea going it all on her lonesome? Please. Get a grip.
Filed under: Hackery (218 more articles) , Newspapers (382 more articles) , North Korea (12 more articles) , South Korea (3 more articles) , Totalitarianism (3 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (25)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The unions versus the Department for Education — continued - Peter Hoskin
2 Why reason doesn’t apply to the Eurozone - Fraser Nelson
3 Cameron can no longer laugh off Ed - James Forsyth
4 The unions' lazy opposition to schools reform - Peter Hoskin
5 The strains on the Cameron-Hilton relationship - James Forsyth
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Tron
December 22nd, 2011 4:03pm Report this commentThe Times, The Guardian, The Independent and of course The Telegraph. I can't tell them apart these days. This article could have been in any of them.
rjohns16
December 22nd, 2011 4:26pm Report this commentYip, was amazed when I read that too. Totalitarianism is ok if it preserves an 'authentic' way of life for - as the article certainly reads - the amusement/entertainment of Westerners? Who can go marvel at the 'Koreaness' from afar as the inhabitants starve, or, if they ever get in, leave when they feel hungry. Madness.
severn
December 22nd, 2011 4:59pm Report this commentYou are absolutely right. And the mental wrench the article inflicts on one is painful.
But it makes a good point of comparison with the effect on the informed person of reading the Spectator on climate change or HIV. Same disconnect from reality.
John T
December 22nd, 2011 5:48pm Report this comment@Burch. Not pointless at all. Only this week one of the Guardian's deranged columnists rubbished Vaclav Havel for vandalising the communist utopias of Eastern Europe.
Chris B
December 22nd, 2011 7:36pm Report this commentHey, he has a point. I've been deriding the loss of American culture ever since the king was replaced by the president, the musket gave way to the rifle, the powdered wig fell out of style, slavery was repealed by the 13th Amendment, and railroads replaced horse-drawn carriages. We no longer live in America! We live in its ugly, inbred, grossly mutated great grandchild. The horror!
Pete
December 22nd, 2011 7:52pm Report this commentNot only a revolting passage, but inaccurate. Pyongyang has absolutely NOT gone it alone - NK's economy would be even more of a basket case without decades of support from Beijing.
Tom Youngren
December 22nd, 2011 7:53pm Report this commentIt was ever thus. The spectacle of poor people enjoying themselves without the instruction of their betters has always been unpleasant viewing for those self same betters, but should we want it any other way? Please understand, this American writes sarcastically.
Arturo
December 22nd, 2011 7:53pm Report this commentManic. To think that somehow preserving traditions and safeguarding "Koreanness" is an acceptable exchange for totalitarianism and isolationism at it's extreme. North Korea's historicity aside, the notion alone is reprehensible.
JTE
December 22nd, 2011 8:53pm Report this commentSo apparently a brutal, warmongering totalitarian police state and massive food insecurity is a small price to pay for having to put up with relatively less consumerist kitch in downtown Pyongyang. Right.
Archibald
December 23rd, 2011 12:02am Report this commentBurch epitomizes the tribal nature of British politics. We're on the cusp of dangerous extremism, supporting 'our' side like a football team. Is it still democracy when the majority of voters have no idea of the facts but hate the other 'team'? I don't think so. Centralization of party power has screwed our parliament somewhat, but the future must lie in reform of party influence and MPs doing what they are elected for. The cretins that populate this land certainly can't be trusted with anything, something the internet age has brutally exposed. It's called the mother of all parliaments for a reason, it needs to start defending itself much more forcefully instead of pandering to idiots and bowing to media populism.
The Arcadian
December 23rd, 2011 2:27am Report this commentIts a multilayered delusion that most likely assumes that the conflict with Korea is really the west's fault and that the NK people are better off being free of western imperialism. Note the complete lack of consistent logic in even these two ideas.
Patrick
December 23rd, 2011 3:51am Report this commentLuckily, now that the cold war is over you see a lot less of this nonsense in print. During the cold war, there was of course plenty of it. It always seems that the people who pen romantic tributes to the pluckiness of, say, Cuba, have some sort of axe to grind against the rampant individualism (known to most of us as freedom) of America.
unclesmrgol
December 23rd, 2011 6:43am Report this commentTo understand "authentic Korean", get onto youtube and search for "north korean traffic lady". "In war, they could be dropped behind enemy lines to mis-direct supply convoys. No other nation has this technology. It is a huge advantage."
Alex
December 23rd, 2011 10:07am Report this comment"India’s attempt to go it alone failed. So, it seems, has Burma’s. Perhaps inevitably, North Korea’s attempt appears to be tottering. But seeing how South Korea has turned out — its Koreanness utterly submerged in neon, hip-hop and every imaginable American influence, a romantic can allow himself a small measure of melancholy: North Korea, for all its faults, is undeniably still Korea, a place uniquely representative of an ancient and rather remarkable Asian culture. And that, in a world otherwise rendered so bland, is perhaps no bad thing."
And if i were to say the same thing about what England has been turned into, the land of foreign cultures and religions, land of Americanised nonsense like hip hop, etc. I'd be labeled by the Guardian as racist.
This only goes to show that the left like multi-culturalism only when it destroys indigenous European culture.
Ross
December 23rd, 2011 10:32am Report this commentNot only is it revolting, but he appears to have stolen the idea from noted North Korean apologist Bruce Cumings who has previously written:
" Does this system promote human freedom? Not from any liberal's standpoint. But from a Korean standpoint, where freedom is also defined as an independent stance against foreign predators—freedom for the Korean nation—here, the vitriolic judgments do not flow so easily. This is a cardinal virtue among a people that has preserved its integrity and continuity in the same place since the early Christian era … After all, there is one undeniable freedom in North Korea, and that is the freedom to be Korean."
moron
December 23rd, 2011 2:08pm Report this commentSay what you will about rape, at least it's sex.
Say what you will about a heart attack, at least it means your heart is beating.
Say what you will about a child's death, at least there will be a meal.
RCE
December 23rd, 2011 6:53pm Report this commentAlex @ 10:07 - you beat me to it.
Oscar
December 24th, 2011 4:47am Report this commentBut Kim didn't want to be left alone, he complained about feeling ronery, did he not?
Teacher in Tejas
December 24th, 2011 6:53pm Report this commentDamn this guy makes a great point about North Korea. This Anglo-phile Yank would like to add that England sure hasn't been the same since that William the Conqueror showed up! England used to be England until then. (sarcasm off now)
C*B
December 24th, 2011 7:03pm Report this commentWinchester lists himself as a 'traveler' who spends most of his time in the U.S., that land of indigenous peoples trying to protect themselves -- go it alone -- by stopping the flow of immigrants from Mexico and Central America. But Winchester sees this 'going it alone' as a sign of U.S. right-wing racism. So, say what you will about the neon and hip hop, at least it still draws immigrants, a continuingly useful literary device for Winchester's essays on the bigotries of his adopted home, which is important if you want to keep selling pieces to the Guardian and the Independent. And no wonder the poor missionary lad is compelled to live in a gated community in that colonial wasteland. For one thing, it is impossible to get good tea and cable TV on the indigenous reservations there.
Jennie Kermode
December 25th, 2011 2:53pm Report this commentWhat you need, my friend, is a holiday in Cambodia.
ChurchSox
December 25th, 2011 5:09pm Report this commentLet's turn this around:
"But seeing how Los Angeles has turned out -- its Americanness utterly submerged in barbeques, karaoke clubs, Asian groceries and every imaginable Korean influence, a romantic can allow himself a small measure of melancholy..."
Hey, this is fun.
But seeing how Pyongyang has turned out, its Koreanness utterly submerged in gawdawful architecture, statues of its leaders pointing to the future, and every imaginable crappy Stalinist influence, a romantic can allow himself a small measure of melancholy..."
What an elegantly framed argument against diversity... and from the Grauniad, no less.
bingbing
December 26th, 2011 9:31pm Report this commentI live in Korea, am married to a Korean, and I'll really try to hold back, but comments like Mick Hartley's and Winchester's make my blood boil.
We're talking about a nation that has had it soul split in half with this communist pap, and these halfwits have the gall to romanticise it.
Krasnaya
December 29th, 2011 2:33pm Report this commentMr. Winchester is one more useful tool of the communist. Alas, wishes he were living under the glorious times of comrade Stalin where he could enjoy all the fruits of unblemished communal life in a free soviet republic.
Oh yes he lives in NYC and MA. How appropriate. These lands are already tinged red.
D. Kim
December 31st, 2011 3:23am Report this commentAbsolutely ridiculous. The columnist makes a grave error in assuming that "juche" or "songun politics" -- both creations of the Kim family of the last couple of decades -- might have anything to do with Koreanness. To make such an assumption is an insult to all Koreans, a people belonging to a nation that goes back millennia true Koreanness. Rather, Winchester should just state the obvious: "I resent the United States and its leading role in globalization."
Back to top