Shockingly, it is possible some of you did not see my appearance on BBC News this afternoon. Thanks to the wonders of Youtube and the baffling enthusiasm some people have for clipping and sharing these things, you can catch up with it now.
As is always the case, I forgot half the things I wanted to say. Jon Sopel asked if it was really plausible for David Cameron to "do nothing". Well, of course it is. Indeed when you cannot offer anything useful it is best to offer nothing at all. The time - as a few of us argued back then - for Conservatives to back a referendum came and went in the last parliament. The Tories could have (nay, should have) supported Alex Salmond's referendum bill then. Their tardy conversion to the cause is, rather too evidently, a matter of political expediency and, equally plainly, an effort to trap Salmond. This is a foolish approach.
Were I Salmond, I would welcome Mr Cameron's overdue appreciation that a referendum is no bad thing and then carry merrily along my way to hold a vote, of whatever legal status, at a moment of my choosing. I would dare London to offer legal challenges and any other obstacles they consider necessary or useful and I would trust that the counting of the votes will change the political, though perhaps not the legal, "reality". Which means I'd probably offer a two question referendum too.
Of course, were I David Cameron I'd accept that Salmond, bugger it, has the ball and the right to set the conditions for the game. This may be inconvenient or sub-optimal but there it is. And then I would ask just this: do you really wish to make foreigners of your English friends and relatives? I would trust the people to make their own minds up and I would do little to get in the way of that.
I certainly would not be peddling tripe that "economic uncertainty" means the referendum must be held as soon as possible. If anything is certain, economic uncertainty is certain and will and always must be the case. So what? Besides, we can remember how exactly this argument was made before Home Rule and, lo, the darkest prophecies of doom did not come to pass. Perhaps it would be different this time but I cannot see how you win - or win with class at any rate - by suggesting the sky must fall. It probably won't, you know?
Finally, Salmond could, perhaps even should, use this as a moment to tweak Cameron, disguised as generosity. I'd invite him to Edinburgh for a chat at Bute House, statesman to statesman, and see how they can give the appearance of working together. I'd do so because doing so elevates Salmond while making Cameron appear the supplicant. So were I Cameron I'd be wary of this. Then again, were I Cameron I wouldn't have done what he's done today. Little good can come of it so it would be best had he kept quiet.
Filed under: Britain (686 more articles) , Cameron (212 more articles) , Salmond (75 more articles) , Scotland (468 more articles) , Scottish independence (40 more articles) , SNP (195 more articles) , Tories (265 more articles)
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (23)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Osborne accidentally makes the case for more savings - Fraser Nelson
2 The Tories desert Cable in the Commons - James Forsyth
3 Balls the tax-cutter? - Fraser Nelson
4 The depressing appointment of Les Ebdon - James Forsyth
5 The tax debate at the heart of the Budget - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
1 The implications of today's border security report - Frank Monaco (76)
2 The green squeeze - James Forsyth (56)
3 Hague's ‘Cold War’ warning - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle (54)
4 Letts for DG - Quentin Letts (36)
5 50p tax rate is raising less than expected - James Forsyth (34)
Andrew Sullivan
Ben Smith
Charles Crawford
Chris Dillow
Claudia Massie
Dan Drezner
Daniel Larison
Dave Weigel
Ezra Klein
French Politics
Global Guerrilas (John Robb)
Henry Porter
James Fallows
Julian Sanchez
Kerry Howley
Kevin Drum
League of Ordinary Gentlemen
Marc Ambinder
Matt Zeitlin
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
More than Mind Games
Mr Eugenides
Norm Geras
Our Kingdom
Outside the Beltway
Radley Balko
Reason: Hit&Run
Rod Dreher
Samizdata
Scottish Unionist
SNP Tactical Voting
The American Scene
The Plank
Tim Worstall
Toby Harnden
Will Wilkinson
Charlotte Gore
Iain Martin
Hopi Sen
Liberal Vision
Left Back in the Changing Room
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Rhoda Klapp
January 9th, 2012 7:58pm Report this commentAs I understand it, all Scots are for a vote on independence unless it is an english initiative. Shouldn't independence voters be keen to support any referendum? Can it be left hanging for as long as it takes for the SNP to be sure of victory? Because if it is a case of wicked england exploiting the puir scots, wouldn't we all be best off bringing it to a close ASAP? If it is so unclear that it is the timing which decides a once-for-all vote one way or the other, isn't that a rather unsatisfactory basis for proceeding?
Still waiting to hear the case for union. To an English person the case for a split presents itself, no need to explain that. But I have observed that Scots on these posts will not accept being agreed with.
George Shepherd
January 9th, 2012 8:18pm Report this commentTories and SNP gain from this rather clumsy move
It gives Cameron a few good Daily Mail headlines and it gives the SNP the opportunity to complain about London interference
They would refuse to take part / campaign in a London imposed referendum and the whole thing would become a sham
Devo-max would then follow which suits the SNP technocrats and also dampens Labour support in Scotland which suits the Tories
Who's to say Salmond and Cameron haven't actually planned the whole thing behind the scenes??
ps Alex - you came over as a voice of common sense on the news today !!
Edward McLaughlin
January 9th, 2012 9:08pm Report this commentThis is about Scottish things again isn't it?
Edward McLaughlin
January 9th, 2012 9:28pm Report this commentActually, having now listened to the clip, I thought you came over very well, pointing out quite a few things which rang true and which I've heard nowhere else. Never mind you wanted to include more - what you got in was strong.
The analogy with the EU's smothering tactics was especially telling and likely to resonate in many hitherto uninterested minds.
Joe Heron
January 9th, 2012 9:35pm Report this commentGreat stuff Alex.
In2minds
January 9th, 2012 9:58pm Report this comment"As is always the case, I forgot half the things I wanted to say" - Forgot to put a tie on as well, Verity will be livid.
Laurence
January 9th, 2012 10:00pm Report this commentAlex, You like like Kurt Russell in The Thing. Did something happen to you on Jura?
andrew kerins
January 9th, 2012 11:51pm Report this comment'A two question referendum.
If, rather than a 'menu' with three choices, we are talking about two individual questions;
A Do you want Independence ? YES or NO
B Do you want Devo Max ? YES OR NO
It is quite possible that the result could be a vote for Independence, by 51% of voters and a vote for Devo Max by 62% of voters.
In which case ?
Peninsula
January 10th, 2012 1:59am Report this commentAlex, do you really think using the word 'foreigner' in a pejorative way is a good way to promote the union in Scotland?
Or maybe it would just galvanize the cliche about Tories/little englanders/johnnie foreigner hating; the very things many Scots dislike about the union?
You were doing so well too.
Craig Strachan
January 10th, 2012 2:08am Report this commentVery good, Alex. You should do more on-camera stuff. (Although preferably without being stuck in one-third of a split screen, with a PBS-style "Flying over Scotland" travelogue occupying the other two-thirds. What were they thinking?)
Ian Walker
January 10th, 2012 4:36am Report this commentSo much fun watching the whingers from the north pout and wail at their bluff being called. He's your Prime Minister too, y'know.
Cameron can't lose on this one. Scottish independence would mean the end of Labour's chance to win an election based on English votes alone. And a vote to keep the union would fatally wound the dangerous Salmond, and cheer up the crusties in his own party.
RJBH
January 10th, 2012 6:21am Report this commentAye Alex... you have it prettywell summed up..Alex Salmond will out think and outplay old boy Cameron..Im not even sure what Cameron is trying to do...but what he has done.. has not endeared himself to those who will vote... If Scotland wanted to be like England...we would not have our own parliament already.. would we?
Sheumais
January 10th, 2012 10:28am Report this commentAs the proposed change is for Scotland to leave the UK, the case has to be made to support that change, not maintaining the status quo. Salmond has not provided any detail as to how or why we would be better off either as an independent nation or as a very small and insignificant member of the EU, just some nonsense about emulating Norway. Why on earth you think Cameron would agree to be summoned to a meeting at Bute House I don't know, but there is no reason he should.
It is entirely false to believe Scottish independence would ensure a Conservative government in England in perpetuity, as the result of the 1997 general election will confirm. Labour had a comfortable majority in England then and, whilst they may have made an unfortunate decision when choosing their current leader, that can change.
Barry B
January 10th, 2012 10:44am Report this commentCan someone explain why having English friends and relatives as "foreigners" is any more objectionable to having Australian, Canadian or American foreign friends and relatives?
ThigArLatha
January 10th, 2012 10:52am Report this commentWhat if Alex Salmond really takes the high ground?
"Well, I am concerned for the future of Scotland and so I am inviting the PM,DPM and Ed Milliband up to Bute House to see if we can not sort this out amicably for the best interests of Scotland AND our neighbours"
Result - Alex wins, putting Scotland first rather than falling into Cameron's politically motivated trap. People also forget why he wants to delay the vote.
He also wins because he is taking the lead. If DC/Cleggie and Milliband refuse to go up they appear like boors to the Scots, If they do they show him as the leader of a nation, not as a jumped up regional figure.
Seriously it is like watching Kasparov take on my 3 year old. I can only assume that Cameron has a hidden agenda against the Union because he has made a monumental error here.
James Matthews
January 10th, 2012 10:54am Report this commentWrong on all counts. Cameron is entirely right, in the interests of the 92.5% of UK citizens who do not live in Scotland, to ask for a clear decision from the 8.5% who do and for that decision not to be unduly delayed.
The bottom line for the rest of us is that an independent Scotland is much to be preferred to a Scotland which constantly threatens to leave but never sets a date. Cameron has much less to lose than Salmond as the consternation and outrage from the cybernats at the possibility that their bluff might be called clearly demonstrates
Rhoda Klapp
January 10th, 2012 11:00am Report this commentMuch from Massie about how this person is wrong, and that policy is bad. What do you actually want to happen. Status Quo OK with you? We can just keep on going like this, and a union with the sword of damocles hanging over it is better than no union at all? What is the case for union? What is the case against resolving the issue?
Jo MacDon
January 10th, 2012 12:21pm Report this comment"And then I would ask just this: do you really wish to make foreigners of your English friends and relatives?"
Addressed by the SNP here:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/politics/snp-suggests-dual-citizenship-plan-for-an-independent-scotland-1.918528
“Given Scotland’s close ties to the other parts of the British Isles a positive approach to dual citizenship would be essential.
“And given the existence of EU citizenship consideration could also be given to the creation of enhanced citizenship arrangements with the nations of the UK.”
This could include rights such as voting entitlements, along the lines of the current set-up which gives Irish Republic citizens rights to vote in the UK.
Mac
January 10th, 2012 2:53pm Report this commentScots probably have more friends and relatives who live in Canada, US, Aus and NZ than in England.
Cameron will now be welcome with open arms when he dares to cross the border. A sure fire vote winner for the independence cause.
Finally the Scottish government will gladly accept powers from Cameron to run a legally binding referendum without any conditions attached. Just don't expect that power to be handed back though.
Kingstonian
January 10th, 2012 3:07pm Report this commentJo MacDon - I rather suspect that the dual citizenship idea will be a bit of a one-way street; the idea that Salmond would allow English people the right to vote in Scotland is laughable while he is certainly brazen enough to demand that Scots in England are given the right to vote here.
If being a citizen of England as well as Scotland (and presumable Wales and Northern Ireland too) is so important, why would Scots want independence in the first place?
David Ashman
January 11th, 2012 12:07am Report this commentCamereon wants SCotland to leave the union. He can then get the majority he needs in England. Cunning.
Nicholas
January 11th, 2012 9:17am Report this comment"This could include rights such as voting entitlements, along the lines of the current set-up which gives Irish Republic citizens rights to vote in the UK."
Personally I find that outrageous and believe it long overdue to be rescinded, especially after decades of that rogue nation exporting terrorism here.
gordy
January 11th, 2012 8:08pm Report this commentI hope that Alec finally brings independence to Scotland. I suggest that he extends the referendum vote to we millions of Scots overseas. There are already precedents, in that Italians living in Australia get to vote in the Italian elections.
Back to top