Everything this year seems to have aligned for the Democrats. The incumbent Republican president is deeply unpopular, more than three quarters of voters think the country is on the wrong track, the economy is in trouble and the conservative coalition is fracturing. But still the presidential race is tight; there aren’t more than a couple of points in it. The explanation for this is quite simple: the election has moved from being a referendum on the Bush years to a referendum on Barack Obama. The extent to which Obama dominates the media coverage of the campaign means that the most important thing in deciding your vote is what you think of Obama. This is what explains why quite so many Clinton Democrats are supporting McCain. Cleverly, the McCain campaign has realised this works to its favour.
It has stopped raging against the media’s obsession with Obama and is instead feeding it with a string of critical ads and direct attacks. All this is rapidly turning Obama into the incumbent, worrying the life out of the Democrats who know that undecided voters tend to break for the challenger and that Obama’s margin isn’t big enough to deal with this. Over the next three nights, the Democrats have to try and turn this into a choice between Obama and McCain. (Next week, the Republicans will talk almost incessantly about Obama in an effort to keep the spotlight on the Democrat).
This is going to require the Obama campaign to retool. In this new environment, many of Obama’s strengths—his ability to dominate the news, the power of his rhetoric and the fascination with his candidacy—are now weaknesses. It is going to have to go negative on McCain, a difficult candidate to attack in personal terms because of the heroism of his military service. The real test of this convention will not be the size of the polling bounce Obama receives but whether or not it does permanent damage to McCain’s favourability ratings. Ironically, if the Democrats had nominated a less compelling candidate, a moderate technocrat say like Mark Warner, the former Virginia governor who is tonight’s keynote speaker, or Evan Bayh, the former governor of Indiana and now a Senator, they might well be in better shape. But these less exciting politicians were all scared out of the race by the presence of Clinton and Obama, two candidates who swallowed up nearly all the available oxygen.
Blogs: Coffee House | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (5)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Cindy
August 26th, 2008 9:57pmBush might be 'deeply unpopular' but he is still MORE POPULAR than Brown. Bush approval ratings currently stand at between €39%, whereas our own G Brown's currently stands at -36%. As the Americans would say, GO FIGURE!
Cindy
August 26th, 2008 11:04pmThat should read €39%
The Lavish Carbon Footprint
August 26th, 2008 11:12pmJames, in other words, par for the course. With the exception of Ronald Reagan, the outgoing president is always, after eight years in office, unpopular.
Interesting, Cindy, that Mr Bush has taken eight years to get to that point, and Brown did it in a year, and with a lower percentage.
Seasurfer1
August 26th, 2008 11:29pmMcCain, just needs to pick a woman as a running mate and the Presidency is his.
Ian C
August 27th, 2008 1:14pmThe Democrats have set themselves a very difficult task.
The choice can so easily be characterised as 'A tax and spend liberal who thinks he know how to spend your money better than you, or an experienced qualified tough man who wants to bring your taxes and gas prices down.'
It's that simple. This election is about Obama - why should innately conservative America, with a small 'c', elect a law lecturer and social 'organiser' over an experienced politician with a highly respected, if not perfect, record?
There is only one reason and that is because he is very articulate. But he is not so articulate as to be out of sight in the polls by now, which I think he needed to be. So what is he going to come up with in the next 8 weeks that puts him that way?