There is no denying that this convention in St Paul is a smaller and less charged event - not just compared to Denver last week but the Republican convention in New York in 2004. But, in effect, it’s only opening night. Sarah Palin’s up tomorrow, and I can’t wait.
As Gustav fades, the first real night of the real convention has started. The signs, funny hats, even hesitant dancing (to Johnny B Goode). Guests were there: George HW Bush, his wife and Cindy McCain, to whom the cameras kept going back. She sat there looking like she’s escaped from a Stepford Wives remake. She will, I suspect, compare badly to Michelle Obama (whom I’m completely sold on).
First up tonight was Laura Bush, who was a smash hit. One forgets what an asset she’s been for him – pretty, graceful and not Teresa Heinz Kerry. She listed his greatest hits - “The most important education reform in a generation” and the highest SAT results for minorities and 2m being treated for Aids in Africa. “That’s change you can believe in,” she said, taunting Obama. The crowd loved it..
Next came George W Bush on the video speech screen, a method that didn’t work well – just as well, then, that McCain didn’t decide to use it. The panto act is a large part of these American convention speeches, yet Bush couldn’t do any of it without hearing the crowd. The television monitors would switch the audio from either him, or the floor so the applause came instantaneously and sounded like the laughter in Happy Days. A few words of praise for McCain – how he refused the offer of early release as a POW. “For that he suffered five more years of beatings. For that his arms were broken but not his honour. If the Hanoi Hilton could not break John McCain’s resolve to do what’s best for his country, you can bet the angry left never will.” Then even more usefully, distance between himself and McCain. “He’s not afraid to tell you when he disagrees. Believe me, I know”. He could have done a little more of that, I thought. Of course being the president, Bush could have taken his advisers with him if he wanted. He stayed away because he’s toxic to McCain’s reform message.
Third up was Fred Thomson, doing character appraisals. I wasn’t going to blog this, given how dire he was in the primaries, but his speech was surprisingly good. Here are some extracts:-Sarah Palin – “She’s from a small town, with small town values. But that’s not good enough for some people who are attacking her and her family”. The crowd were not so much booing as baying for blood. A trick from Thomson: there are enough well-funded Republican-haters out there to produce enough bile to flood the blogosphere with rumours. I doubt they were the work of the Democrats.
“Some Washington pundits and media big shots are in a frenzy over the selection of a woman who has actually governed rather than just talked a good game on the Washington talk shows and hit the Washington cocktail circuit”. Crowd went wild. “I say give me a tough Alaskan governor of the largest state in the union who has taken on the establishment and won over the beltway business-as-usual crowd any day of the week.” She has “got the media in a state of panic,” he said. “She’s run a municipality and a state. She’s the only nominee in the history of any party who knows how to field wrestle moose.” Then silence as he described McCain’s torture in prison. Beatings, cracked ribs, a story which would without doubt tug every American heartstring. This is why Obama salutes McCain before every time the lay into him: it’s incredibly powerful. “Being a POW doesn’t qualify anyone to be president. But it does reveal character. This is the kind of character that civilisations across history have sought from their leaders: strength, courage, humility, wisdom, duty, honour. There are two questions we’ll never had to ask ourselves: how is this man and can we trust him with the presidency.” Roar.
Finally, Joe Lieberman. Watching this ageing windbag on stage, it was hard to believe he was touted as vice president candidate. Yet he’s totemic: a self-described Democrat who had to stand as an independent coming asking non-aligned voters to go McCain. “What is a Democrat like me doing at a Repulican comvention like this?” they answered with the ‘Country First’ slogan. “I’m here to support John McCain because country matters more than party.” His speech was billed as being revolutionary and raucous - but I found it lifeless. He even called 9-11 a “great natural disaster” before correcting himself. He kept making weak jokes, then laughing at them. He had such little zing, he made Hillary Clinton’s endorsement of Obama last week look enthusiastic. There is no denying that this convention in St Paul is a smaller and less charged event - not just compared to Denver last week but the Republican convention in New York in 2004. But, in effect, it’s only opening night. Sarah Palin’s up tomorrow, and I can’t wait.
P.S. There was a brief tribute to Ronald Reagan. “The media hated him,” said the narrator. “Some dared breath the word ‘maverick’” – remind you of anyone? The intention was to tee up McCain as a successor. “He inspired the Reagan Revolution. One of its footsoldiers was soon to be a congressman: John McCain.” Not the best quality video I’ve seen, but redeemed by this line: “He hated inflation, taxes and the Soviets.” Class.
Blogs: Coffee House | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (8)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £17.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Murray
September 3rd, 2008 10:30amI too am looking forward to Govenor Palin's speech tonight. Despite the media/blog hurricane about her and her family this weekend, it is important to remember the big picture:
It doesn't matter what the media thinks of her, it doesn't matter what the people in the safely blue and safely red states think about her. All that matters is how 50.1% of the people in 3 to 5 states think about her and her running mate vs. Obama-Biden. So simple, but lost in the ear splitting static of our non-stop 24 hour media circus.
To me, tonight will tell who is going to win in November. Did McCain hit it out of the park with this V.P. pick or did he commit an unforced error? Lots of pressure on Ms. Palin. You go girl!
JONNY
September 3rd, 2008 10:56amAnd there seems to be emerging quite a downside for McCain.
1. With Sarah Palin stealing his thunder as the sensational new media persona exploding onto the scene. At the same time making him look old and frail.
2. Yes frail - in the sense there is suddenly renewed concern about his age, his cancer skin and the short time he might be expected to survive in the job.
Oscar
September 3rd, 2008 1:07pmAs someone who has had skin cancer I find it incredibly offensive the way an alarmist prognosis is now being exploited in the anti-McCain campaign which give an entirely misleading sense of doom about McCain's health. It is plain wrong to send out these alarmist messages, causing quite unnecessary distress and anxiety to millions.
Verity
September 3rd, 2008 3:35pmFraser, you're a very beguiling writer and I am basically sold on you, but your judgement of Michelle Obama is way, way, way off. Ask you wife.
This gal's been a grabber all her life. Two scholarships at two Ivy Leagues. Did she merit them, or did she fit the black advancement profile?
Had she merited it, with those kinds of qualificationxs - two Ivy leagues! - she would have gone into a demanding profession or industry. She could have been a nuclear physicist, or a research chemist or been on track to become the CEO of a Fortune 500 (The wor;dwide CEO of Pepsi is a woman - an Indian), or siimilar.
But what did our grabby, self-righteous, uber self-regarding Michelle go into with her two degrees? Why, the "diversity" industry of course! At $350K a year. She's aon-productive, leachlike passenger. All that first rank education to be a glorified outreach coordinator. She's a big, greedy zero.
Contrast with Sarah Palin who worked her way through an average college and, on graduating, went straight into the productive/wealth-producing sector. And moved like lightening through her own brainpower and daring.
Micelle Obama is revolting - by which I mean it would give me the creeps to shake hands with her, and I will bet you every woman who posts here agrees with this assessment.
Trafalgar
September 3rd, 2008 6:11pmCut Michele Obama a break Verity.
She wasn't born with a silver spoon in her mouth. She has risen to a prominent position from a tough background through hard work and a good education, and cares for her kids in a secure family unit.
Good on her - she deserves her wage. And why are you comparing her to Palin? She isn't running for office.
If the candidates' kids should be off-limits - why not their wives? Or do we have to muck-rake through Cindy McCain's past (who was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and is a more valid comparison).
And please spare us the capital letters.
Craig Strachan
September 3rd, 2008 8:12pmVerity: "Contrast with Sarah Palin who worked her way through an average college and, on graduating, went straight into the productive/wealth-producing sector."
Well, she helped Todd out with the commercial fishing and did "occasional" gigs as a TV sports reporter.
Verity
September 3rd, 2008 9:02pmCraig Strachan - Quite. Governor Palin took jobs in the wealth-creating sector. And if you think it's something to look down on that she worked in the fishing industry and did a stint as a sports reporters, you don't know America. She has supported herself in he wealth producing sector since she left college.
Tragalgar writes: "Cut Michele Obama a break Verity."
No.
"She has risen to a prominent position..." What prominent position? I don't remember hearing about it. Last I heard she was on the "diversity" gig. In the same way her husband was on the "community coordinator" gig.
She caes for her children in "a secure family unit".
What is a "family unit", secure or otherwise?
"f the candidates' kids should be off-limits - why not their wives?"
Because the wives are adults and made choices?
The Laughing Cavalier
September 4th, 2008 12:54pmHe didn't say "field wrestle a moose", he said "field dress a moose". Slight difference