<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
	
	
    <title>US Election Blog | The Spectator</title>
    <description>US Election 2008</description>
	<copyright>Copyright 2008 The Spectator</copyright>
    <language>en-gb</language>
	    
	<link>http://www.spectator.co.uk</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:52:11 BST</lastBuildDate>
	


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[The blame game]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img hspace="5" align="left" vspace="5" _extended="true" alt="" src="/article_images/articledir_1386/693396/1_fullsize.jpg" />The presidency is the GOP&#8217;s best chance of a win in this year&#8217;s national elections, it is almost certain that the Democrats will expand their majorities in the House and the Senate. The consequences of a presidential defeat could be dire for the Republicans and not just for the reason that it would see them lose the White House. </p><p> McCain is sending every signal that he will not push some buttons the Republican base wants him to. For instance, McCain&#8212;who believes in comprehensive immigration reform&#8212;isn&#8217;t going to demagogue the immigration issue. He]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/693396/the-blame-game.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 09 May 2008 18:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/693396/the-blame-game.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[Did Mark Penn really not know the first thing about Democratic primaries?]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img hspace="5" align="left" vspace="5" _extended="true" alt="" src="/article_images/articledir_1374/687451/1_fullsize.jpg" />Time&#8217;s analysis of why the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1738331,00.html ">Clinton campaign failed</a> is well worth reading.&#160; One anecdote in it, in particular, is generating a lot of buzz here in DC: <em><blockquote><em>As aides looked over the campaign calendar, chief strategist Mark Penn confidently predicted that an early win in California would put her over the top because she would pick up all the state's 370 delegates. It sounded smart, but as every high school civics student now knows, Penn was wrong: Democrats, unlike the Republicans, apportion their delegates according to vote totals, rather than allowing</em></em></blockquote>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/687451/did-mark-penn-really-not-know-the-first-thing-about-democratic-primaries.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 08 May 2008 19:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/687451/did-mark-penn-really-not-know-the-first-thing-about-democratic-primaries.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[Sisters, we're not&amp;nbsp;finished yet]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img title=" ... Shift+R improves the quality of this image. CTRL+F5 reloads the whole page." hspace="5" align="left" vspace="5" _extended="true" bmi_touched="1" bmi_title=" ... Shift+R improves the quality of this image. CTRL+F5 reloads the whole page." alt="" src="/article_images/articledir_1373/686916/1_listing.jpg" />There&#8217;s no sign yet that Hillary is preparing to exit the race. Last night at a fundraiser for her female supporters <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/05/07/clinton-to-female-base-ive-come-back-before/">she declared</a>: <em><blockquote><em>&#8220;When I was counted out in New Hampshire, it was the women of New Hampshire who came back and said no, she&#8217;s not finished yet,&#8221; Clinton also said. &#8220;When I was counted out before Super Tuesday, it was women from</em></em></blockquote>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/686916/sisters-were-notfinished-yet.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 08 May 2008 15:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/686916/sisters-were-notfinished-yet.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[The Clinton campaign's initial and fatal mistake]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img hspace="5" align="left" vspace="5" _extended="true" alt="" src="/article_images/articledir_1368/684196/1_listing.jpg" />With the Clinton campaign almost done, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/07/AR2008050700065.html">post-mortems are starting</a>. There&#8217;ll be lots of hand-wringing about why the Clintons ceded a bunch of states to Obama, why the message was so confused until March and why the campaign shied away from humanising her. But I think the campaign&#8217;s fundamental error actually happened at the very start of the process, just after Obama declared he was running. At that point, the Clinton campaign had two options: kill him by kindness or just take him down. The former would have been the best option]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/684196/the-clinton-campaigns-initial-and-fatal-mistake.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 17:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/684196/the-clinton-campaigns-initial-and-fatal-mistake.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[Hillary lends her campaign&amp;nbsp;&amp;#36;6.4 million]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Clinton camp are desperate to show she's not giving up. They've just added an event in West Virginia, the next state to vote,&#160;to her schedule for today and revealed that she has loaned her campaign &#36;6.4 million and is prepared to lend more.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/659156/hillary-lends-her-campaignand3664-million.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 14:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/659156/hillary-lends-her-campaignand3664-million.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[Obama wins big in North Carolina while Clinton edges home in Indiana]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" hspace="5" align="left" vspace="5" _extended="true" src="/article_images/articledir_1316/658161/1_listing.jpg" />It might have been a split decision but with Obama winning North Carolina by <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#NC">14 points</a> and coming <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#IN">within twenty-odd thousand votes</a> of Clinton in Indiana it was an emphatic points victory for Obama that puts him on the brink of winning the nomination. Hillary Clinton&#8217;s downbeat appearance tonight suggested that she knows the game is almost up. </p><p> On Tuesday morning, the rough metric everyone was using was would Clinton win Indiana by more than Obama won North Carolina. In the end, there was no contest: North Carolina was called]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/658161/obama-wins-big-in-north-carolina-while-clinton-edges-home-in-indiana.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 08:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/658161/obama-wins-big-in-north-carolina-while-clinton-edges-home-in-indiana.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[Hillary wins Indiana by a whisker]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Finally, the vote is in from&#160;Lake County and the networks can call Indiana for Hillary. Considering just how dodgy the delay seemed to many, Clinton surrogates were crying foul on TV pointing to the fact that the Mayor of the city which was holding it all up is a vocal Obama backer, it might just be a good thing for the Obama campaign that they did not win Indiana in these circumstances.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/658061/hillary-wins-indiana-by-a-whisker.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 06:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/658061/hillary-wins-indiana-by-a-whisker.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[No call in Indiana, but Obama congratulates Clinton on 'apparent victory']]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Speaking to his supporters in North Carolina just now, Obama congratulated Clinton on her 'apparent victory' in Indiana. With&#160;75 percent of the vote in, Hillary leads 52 to 48. CBS remains the only network to have called the state for Clinton, though. &#160;</p>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/657971/no-call-in-indiana-but-obama-congratulates-clinton-on-apparent-victory.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 02:43:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/657971/no-call-in-indiana-but-obama-congratulates-clinton-on-apparent-victory.thtml</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
	<title><![CDATA[The networks call North Carolina for Obama straight away]]></title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Within seconds of the poll closing here, the networks have called this state for Obama suggesting that he has won by at least ten points. The more of a margin Obama can run up here the harder it will be for Clinton to get past him in the popular vote.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <link>http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/657851/the-networks-call-north-carolina-for-obama-straight-away.thtml</link>
      <pubDate>, 07 May 2008 00:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<category></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.spectator.co.uk/americano/657851/the-networks-call-north-carolina-for-obama-straight-away.thtml</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>
