Mourning in America

New York is in the grip of memorial mania, writes Tiffany Jenkins

In early 1991, the construction of a federal office building in lower Manhattan was halted after an unexpected discovery. Underneath the ground, covered by a patina of concrete and steel, was the coffin of a colonial-era African. It was not alone. Construction work was halted, archaeologists called in, and it was soon established that the site was a major burial ground from the 17th and 18th centuries. As many as 15,000 to 20,000 black men, women and children were buried there, by the historians’ count, making this one of the most important archaeological finds in all America.

The significance was not lost on New York’s people or its authorities. Here was something that challenged the prevailing idea that there was no slavery in colonial New York, and it immediately took on symbolic importance for the city’s African–American community. In 1993, the site was designated a National Historic Landmark, the most important designation for a national monument, and a status it shares with the Statue of Liberty. And, in February, a visitor centre was opened there. Among the poignant displays is one depicting the dual funeral of an adult and child.

The African Burial Ground National Monument is both moving and fascinating because of what it reveals about forgotten lives. But it also says something about broader trends in memorialisation. We’ve stopped putting great men on pedestals and started commemorating their victims. In the process we are are losing a sense that human history involved leadership and struggle and, yes, sacrifice. In focusing purely on victimhood we are in danger of turning history into a random series of tragic events, instead of something that was purposeful and directed. Something made rather than just experienced.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next page

More articles from: Tiffany Jenkins | this section

Print this article

ShareThis

Post comment

Louis Torres

September 1st, 2010 7:47pm Report this comment

Two corrections: "Great men" do not have "victims," and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial does not "[separate] the soldier from the war" and focus on the "casualties." Only the Maya Lin's Wall Memorial at the site does this.

The other two official components of the VVM are "Three Fighting Men" (Frederick Hart) and the Vietnam Woman's Memorial (Glenna Goodacre). By now this should be common knowledge, especially among critics and scholars who write about the arts. See http://dc.about.com/od/monuments/p/VietnamMemorial.htm for further information.

Louis Torres, Co-Editor, Aristos (An Online Review of the Arts) - http://www.aristos.org

Tom Freudenheim

September 2nd, 2010 10:39am Report this comment

Good piece, Tiffany! There's a kind of shortsightedness that assumes these memorials will have a long life and forever resonate to future generations the way they resonate to those who want to create them for their own personal purposes.

cyrus forman

September 2nd, 2010 8:21pm Report this comment

Did you tour the visitors center or read any of the displays at the African Burial Ground? The "morbid focus on victimization" that you imply is part and parcel of the African Burial Ground could not be further from the truth. The African Burial Ground celebrates the lives of our african founders here in new york and details the role Africans played in creating our city. Would you prefer that we simply ignored this archaeological discovery and continued to ignore the story of New York's African Founders?

Post comment