Conservatives should give Mr Rudd’s ‘earn or learn’ proposals a fair hearing, says John Heard
There is a tremor thrilling through the ranks of young Australians. Recalled from their generational slumber, mouths agape, stimulus payment-funded Wii sticks hanging limply at their sides, they have received advanced warning of something new under the sun. No longer will they sport and sleep, indulging the semi-fashionable, taxpayer-funded ‘pre-life crisis’ encouraged, in various forms, by gentle spirits such as Friedrich von Schiller and John Winston Howard. For the dole-funded ‘gap year’ is no more. The GFC is here, and the fat years are over.
The inheritance of an artificial class, those born into a bureaucratic minority (and relative poverty, generously defined) during the boom years, the dole-funded gap year too often spread the welfare safety net for those young Australians who simply chose to be unproductive. They were not in any danger of falling. They usually just jumped, arms open, off the cliff.
And why not so choose? Other than the intrinsic rewards associated with an advanced degree in Hebrew philology, for instance, or the dubious kudos granted that guy at the party who boasts of his self-sufficiency — his deeply moral, if not properly self-interested, rejection of all welfare — governments have not put any serious pressure on young Australians to continue study or stay at work. They could coast along, and if Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein’s analysis of libertarian paternalism is correct, at times the former welfare arrangements even nudged them towards idleness. Even otherwise serious politicians advised patriotic young Australians to take time out to travel. They should figure themselves out, and find out who they are. When things got tight, they could apply for the dole, and spend an indefinite period of time suspended from responsibility. Indeed, the benefits of inertia — money for next to nothing, alongside an apparent gain in self-understanding — were highly desirable.
More articles from: John Heard | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
When we say the climate is changing, we do not…
The Rudd government’s new school rankings are a welcome improvement.…
For a long time I had my doubts about the…
I agree with what Tony Abbott said in the Great…
‘At one time or another, he had espoused almost every…
1 Another blow for the climate change lobby: Prince Charles
2 American tea-party dishes hopey-changey thing - Melanie Phillips
3 Amnesty International, Moazzam Begg and the Bravery of Gita Sahgal - Martin Bright
4 Why give money to charity when they shaft what they purport to defend? - Rod Liddle
1 Another blow for the climate change lobby: Prince Charles (64)
2 American tea-party dishes hopey-changey thing - Melanie Phillips (63)
3 Why give money to charity when they shaft what they purport to defend? - Rod Liddle (42)
4 Dying for new roads? - Melanie Phillips (27)
5 More news from the un-level playing field - Susan Hill (21)
WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2010 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top