Far from representing a democratic spread of opinion, the ABC’s Q&A program overwhelmingly favours progressive types over conservatives, argues John Styles
Going by the behaviour of audiences week after week — the loud cheering and clapping for progressive causes, and jeers and hissing for conservative ones — the selection process doesn’t seem to be working.
There was a defining Q&A moment in that Jon Faine interview 12 months ago. Discussing the panel guests who would be on the show that night, Faine hammed it up a bit. ‘And, ladies and gentlemen, in one corner, which one I won’t say, we have?’
‘Andrew Bolt, provocative Herald Sun columnist,’ Tony Jones answered.
‘And in the other corner?’ Faine asked.
‘Well, we may have two people in the other corner,’ Jones admitted.
And, of course, they did. Andrew Bolt in one corner. Louise Adler and Susan Carland in the other. And that kind of panel representation goes on week after week at taxpayers’ expense.
An adventure in democracy? More like a mockery of democracy.
John Styles is a Melbourne writer and editor of Australianconservative.com
More articles from: John Styles | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
‘Lunch with Peter is an agony; it’s a nightmare,’ complained…
London London is in drought: it says so on the…
Parliament begins each sitting day with the Lord’s Prayer. This…
So it has come to this: we are so disillusioned…
It is a rare thing for an opera to be…
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Brisbane Girl
March 6th, 2012 1:49am Report this commentI think it's a positive step to have more programs offering the citizen audience opportunities to engage with the democratic process. If you want to wrestle Witt he intricacies then a more transparent process of the question selection would Be more enlightening. But it's worth considering the intermediatory role the media play between citizens and politics - Q&A have tackled it with aplomb. So I agree that to be genuinely democratic such an approach should be reflected in the selection of questions. But I disagree with your point about the show, I think it's excellent infotainment.
Back to top