Subscribe to The Spectator

Friday 25 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Maurice Newman is dead right about the ABC

Wednesday, 14th April 2010

Even Tony Jones admits that Lateline has its own view on man-made global warming, reveals John Styles

Almost two years ago, ABC1 presenter Tony Jones told Crikey publisher Eric Beecher and a Melbourne audience that between 2001 and 2008 the members of the Lateline team made up their minds about the science of climate change. The sceptics, they’d decided, were wrong.

Jones prefaced the admission by saying he was in favour of scepticism. But not, apparently, about climate change. On 6 April 2008, Jones said: ‘From around the year 2001 on Lateline, we began interviewing everybody we could about this subject; and we interviewed all the main scientific sceptics. And gradually, over a period of time, we resolved in our own minds that the sceptics had it wrong and the vast majority of scientists disagreed with their position, that there was a developing consensus and if we didn’t take it seriously we were in grave danger of moving to a position where [it] would simply be too late to do anything about it. And I’m still not sure right now whether we aren’t in that position as we speak.’

Jones’s claim that Lateline had interviewed all the main sceptical scientists was puzzling. Presumably, by the term ‘interview’ he was referring to those long, one-on-one conversations like the nine he has had with Gaia fan and true believer Tim Flannery.

But a dip into the Lateline transcript archive in search of one-on-one interviews with sceptical scientists conducted between 2001 and April 2008 returned just one — with Russian economic adviser Andrey Illarionov.

Sure, Lateline included a few sceptical climate scientists in some packaged reports. But in-depth, information-seeking chats of the Flannery kind have been scarce. Not so rare were interviews with climate change believers. A trawl through the archive netted more than 20 one-on-one interviews in the same period with experts on the true-believer side of the debate. It is a scandalous scorecard: believers 20+, heretics 1.

More articles from: John Styles | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

angela sands

July 28th, 2010 5:28am Report this comment

I( haven't read such tosh in a long time!
Grow up and face the world as it is and stop distracting and confusing all just for the excitement of being controversial.

Iain

October 12th, 2010 2:45pm Report this comment

Hitler Youth in Oz!? ..hearing the acquired views of your James Patterson on the ABCs' "The Drum" was simply a naive diatribe of predictable right wing wallpaper - change his nappy.

Post comment

Back to top


In this section

19 May 2012

‘Lunch with Peter is an agony; it’s a nightmare,’ complained…

19 May 2012

London London is in drought: it says so on the…

19 May 2012

Parliament begins each sitting day with the Lord’s Prayer. This…

19 May 2012

So it has come to this: we are so disillusioned…

19 May 2012

It is a rare thing for an opera to be…

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk