The authors’ chapter on how the lobby and its sympathisers inside the defence department and in the White House propelled the US to attack Iraq the second time is powerful but fails to consider that the US, during the last 50 years, has intervened all over the world for many reasons. After 9/11 in particular, revenge was a big justification for going after Saddam, although he had nothing to do with the assault on the Trade Towers. As Thomas Ricks shows in Fiasco, Saddam was regarded as a pushover whose quick defeat would demonstrate American resolve. Nonetheless, protecting Israel was a main, although not exclusive, justification for the second Iraq war (the authors defend the first Iraq invasion). The Israelis fed the lobby and top Washington officials with false intelligence about WMD and backed the deeply dodgy Ahmed Chalabi as the man to succeed Saddam. Not only was the lobby — which is well funded and can influence congressional elections — important here, but pro-Israel officials, by no means all of whom are Jews, were active as well. The now disgraced Scooter Libby, Vice-president Cheney’s chief of staff, was a central figure, as was John Bolton, under-secretary of state for arms control who, when he became ambassador to the UN, was hailed by the Israelis as the sixth man in their delegation.




Comments
graeme a
March 17th, 2009 12:41amJust a couple of points -
Mr Mirsky - your allegation of Israeli "war crimes" in Israel is based on nothing more empiric than Hizbollah propaganda. The cluster weapons were used against the Hizbollah fighters. Some civilians were hurt by them, but these are a quantity that is insignificant to the conflict. Your conclusion based on "numbers of Lebanese civilians killed" uses casualty figures published by the Hizbollah precisely for the consumption of the likes of you.
Israelis have no problem whatsoever with fair and balanced criticism. Israelis do have a problem with their rebuttal being lumped as "inability to accept criticism" and especially with most of this criticism being the mere deligitimization of the rights of Jews to national self determination (ie - anti-Zionism)
We are extremely tired of Jewish or ex Jewish persons in the diaspora using their Jewishness as a means to endow their statements with added validity and righteousness as they jump on the bandwagon of the hordes of trendy bleeding heart Israel bashers.
I say all this as a member of the IDF (reserve) serving for over 20 years with middle officer rank and intimately acquainted with how the IDF fights, its RoE and the efforts it makes to avoid civilian casualties.
I will add that when I have nothing but immense pride in Israel and the IDF in light of their achievements facing anything ranging from Islamic Jihad to the Western Left.
Report this comment
israeli
September 30th, 2007 4:43pmI would just like to make the point that the reason why Israel (and Israelis) so often seems to reject any criticism is not because we are particularly thin skinned, but because we know that our enemies are looking for any and all ways to weaken us as a means to achieving their final goal of destroying us, and weakening any source of foreign support is one way of doing this. To outsiders it may seem that we are very strong, we feel very vulnerable and know at what price this strength is achieved and the eternal vigilance it demands.
Report this comment
tihson
September 28th, 2007 5:23pmThe trouble with Jonathan Mirsky's thesis is that Ariel Sharon, person with unrivalled experience in the dynamics of Middle Eastern politics cautioned Bush privately prior to 1993 about the dangers of the US invading Iraq, for a number of reasons, including the unlikelihood of democracy taking root there and the danger of strengthening Iran. As to WMD, we shall probably never know the truth. They may have been transported to Syria before the invasion began in as stated in the admittedly hearsay testimony of the former Iraqi air force general, Georges Sada.
Report this comment
tihson
September 28th, 2007 5:22pmThe trouble with Jonathan Mirsky's thesis is that Ariel Sharon, person with unrivalled experience in the dynamics of Middle Eastern politics cautioned Bush privately prior to 1993 about the dangers of the US invading Iraq, for a number of reasons, including the unlikelihood of democracy taking root there and the danger of strengthening Iran. As to WMD, we shall probably never know the truth. They may have been transported to Syria before the invasion began in as stated in the admittedly hearsay testimony of the former Iraqi air force general, Georges Sada.
Report this comment