The Price of Everything: A Parable of Possibility and Prosperity
Russell Roberts
Princeton
£14.95, 216 pages
The Price of Everything: A Parable of Possibility and Prosperity is an economics novel. It tells the tale of a Stanford University student, Ramon Fernandez, who is outraged when a local store called Big Box doubles its prices in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake. Fernandez stages a peaceful protest against the store’s price-gouging tactics at the Stanford campus, but the demonstration is hijacked by a radical and it turns into a mêlée. This is an embarrassment for the college, as Big Box’s chief executive officer, Robert Bachman, is an alumnus of the college and a generous benefactor. In fact, he’s on the cusp of providing funds for a new information technology centre.
Ruth Lieber, the college’s provost and economics professor, befriends Fernandez – one assumes as an exercise in damage limitation – and thus begins a series of dialogues that attempt to justify, or at least explain, why raising prices during a crisis may not be such a terrible thing. Lieber sets about educating the socially conscious student in the wonders of free- market economics. She explains why economists don’t know the price of everything, and don’t need to know the price of everything. Prices are the information that steer knowledge and resources.
Conversations between Fernandez and Lieber take place in Lieber’s office, on a tennis court (Fernandez is a professional tennis player), at a running track, a dinner party and in a café. There’s the occasional interjection during the economics lectures such as: ‘You want another coffee?’ to remind us where we are, but the settings are not important as there is no significant plot to advance. Indeed, the book lacks many of the elements one would expect to find in a conventional novel, such as tension and three-dimensional characters.





Comments
colson
September 29th, 2008 3:36pmI can't think of any single excuse for the existence of the phrase "price gouging" with exception to taxation. Even in the post 9/11 moments, water was generally in abundance and easily had. As I am sure the author has been to or is aware of: New York has a lot of resources nearby in terms of restaurants, bars, coffee shops and other places where water can be had. There was a reasonable expectation that water could be had relatively quickly. In the Post Katrina mode, much of the water system was tainted. Many of the merchants who did survive the floods had no reasonable expectation of when their future supplies were going to be replenished. The impact of Katrina's devastation was regional in nature while 9/11 had a greater impact in a very concentrated (relatively speaking) way.
Maybe a more prescient example of what happens when goods are in short supply is to look at new video game system releases. Retailers are largely forced to sell the products at a fixed retail cost. Other smaller stores have often-times moved towards market-based pricing to move the game systems. Why? The small retailer who tends to carry fewer systems than are allotted to retailers can keep the product in stock. At the same time, the value of the game system is always higher than the sale price required of most retailers. This is why you see eBay auctions spring up to capture that additional, immediate increase in value.
Report this comment
josh
September 29th, 2008 2:46pmThe fact that gouging is an emotive issue is kind of the point, isn't it. He's arguing that people should be rational and realize that "gouging" is actually necessary and good.
Report this comment
Luis
September 28th, 2008 9:41pmClearly diesel generators were not 'well above market value' if there were people willing to pay for them.
Report this comment
noahpoah
September 28th, 2008 8:30pmThe argument is something along the lines of: if vendors are allowed to raise their prices, it will mean that the first people to the store can’t buy all the provisions and therefore there will be some left over for those who get there late.
No, it will mean that only people who value the product sufficiently highly will buy it, making it more likely (not certain) that stock will remain. The first to arrive will buy however much stock they think is worth it to buy.
Report this comment