It was a good idea. You start with a psychiatrist, and not any psychiatrist, but a professor of psychiatry, a man ‘widely viewed as one of the best psychiatrists in the business’, specialising in the treatment of depression; then you give him a caseload of depressives, and not any depressives, but a Balkan rape-victim, an alcoholic English Cabinet Minister, an immigrant forced into prostitution, a young woman hideously scarred by fire, a successful barrister caught out in his adulteries; and you see him as they see him, calm, omniscient, dispensing advice and hope. Then you have him crack up. It was a very good idea.
Still there must have been some nervousness on the part of the publishers, for they felt obliged to insist on the dust-jacket, ‘A Novel’. But then this is yet another materialisation for the spin doctor and political bully who, if you have forgotten, they remind you, also on the dust-jacket, is ‘the best-selling author of The Blair Years’, surely an experience likely to depress anyone. And, if you are still unconvinced of his credentials, they add a quote from a national treasure known to have suffered from this terrible condition: ‘I have rarely read a book where the agonies and insecurities of mental trauma have been so well chronicled’ (Stephen Fry). So Mr Campbell knows his stuff.
But is it a novel? In other words do the little mannikins come alive enough for them to walk and talk for the reader, or are they just paraded with placards, with an accompanying tick-list? Alcoholic Cabinet Minister: what does he drink, where does he hide the stuff, how does he hide its effect, how much does he get through? The point is, do we believe there actually was an alcoholic Cabinet Minister? This presumably is not a problem Mr Campbell had to face when, in an earlier materialisation, he was writing for Forum magazine or whatever it was called. In pornography human anatomy is enough to differentiate the characters, and all you have to do is set in motion the sparse/luxuriant pubic hair, the long/stubby nipples, and the rest of it.



Comments
fixed mealings
November 29th, 2008 9:04pmbut it's alistair campbell for chrissake! how could such minutiae be worth either mentioning or even remembering? if you really think they deserve our attention, be good boys and furnish them.
Report this comment
maurice mcnamara
November 22nd, 2008 10:54amI'm with Mark Ramsden's comment. The vagueness about the title of Forum is only in there to imply the writer is above such things. Just acceptable in spoken conversation, not in writing.
Report this comment
fixed mealings
November 19th, 2008 10:05pmmark ramsden, you seem to be suggesting that instead of reviewing the book, Byron Rogers should be compiling an analytical bibliography of Alistair Campbell's early oeuvre. If it only takes ten seconds to check the name of the publication, do it yourself and let us know the result.
Report this comment
mark ramsden
November 13th, 2008 11:02amIf you can't be bothered to spend ten seconds finding out that it was indeed Forum that Campbell once wrote for why include the detail? To assert your superiority? It's just slapdash.
Report this comment