For many years, Professor Michael Stuermer has been one of the West’s most respected authorities both on Russia and on Germany. As at home in English as in his native German, he has pursued not only an academic career, but has brought lustre to the usually grubby trade of journalism as chief correspondent for Die Welt. Few can be as well qualified to write about contemporary Russia, to analyse the extraordinary phenomenon of Putin or to add a late addendum on Putin’s successor, Dmitri Medvedev.
The resulting book is authoritative, readable and concise. Stuermer traces Putin’s rapid rise via Sobchak’s mayoral office in St Petersburg and Borodin’s holding company for foreign assets to Yeltsin’s ‘family’ at the Kremlin. The new Tsar emerges as a man at home with power who has a strong analytical grasp of the vast difficulties Russia must surmount in order merely to survive, let alone to achieve his primary objective: stability.
The basic facts are depressing. Perhaps the most important is that the population is shrinking, and shrinking rapidly. As Stuermer puts it: ‘Russia, in the 19th century a land of infinite population growth, is now a land of elderly women, mostly widows, as men tend to die in their mid- fifties.’ Putin has said that they die of ‘excessive drinking and work accidents resulting from booze’. Every year the population shrinks by between 800,000 and 900,000. By 2050, some ‘pessimists in Moscow’ are forecasting that the population will consist of fewer than 100 million souls. What makes the situation worse is that so many skilled workers are emigrating, dramatically exacerbating Russia’s shortage of highly skilled labour.



Comments
ritalove
April 10th, 2009 11:33amMy new friend ,
i am well pleased to contact you after going through your
profile on my search for genuine relationship at(www.spectator.co.uk) i will
like to be your good friend, please contact me with this
idd (ritakhal54@yahoo.co.uk) i am waiting for your reply soon,
rita
Report this comment
Herbert Thornton
January 12th, 2009 8:02pmMuch of the Islamic world, led and brainwashed by mad and evil clerics, is becoming an aggressive force that harbours such mindless hatred of the west and of Israel in particular, that the current Islamic Jihad is hastening ever faster towards turning into a jihad that will actually use nuclear weapons.
In this situation, the U.S. State Department's strange efforts (accurately described by Bill Corr’s well justified criticism of them) to give as much offence as possible to Russian sensibilities, and the fact that so much of the British Media seem to be of like mind to the State Department, is very worrying indeed.
If ever the U.S. and Britain had a natural ally to help defend civilisation from nuclear attack by Islamic fanatics, that natural ally is Russia. So, for that matter, are China and India.
It is to be hoped that we will see President Obama – if not the BBC and other British media – abandon this irrational attitude towards Russia, and instead make every effort to enter alliances with it and with the other Great Powers – not just for their common benefit, but for their common preservation.
Report this comment
Bill Corr
January 8th, 2009 2:10pmMea Culpa!
Camp Bondsteel is an immense American military base in Kosova, not a case.
Look for Camp Bondsteel on the internet and be surprised.
The Americans have negotiated the use of air bases in Bulgaria, too. Probably as a sort of insurance in case a future Greek - or Turkish - government cuts up rough and proves less than willing to jump obediently when Uncle Sam orders.
Report this comment
Bill Corr
January 8th, 2009 12:46pmRobert Salisbury's review of Michael Stuermer's book surprisingly omits a few glaring facts and the very obvious conclusions to be drawn from those facts:
For somewhat more than the last decade-and-a-half the ablest brains of the U.S. State Department have applied themselves to the task of humiliating and infuriating the Russians in every way open to them.
Why were the former Warsaw Pact nations and the three Baltic States welcomed into NATO with such indecent haste? Why did the Americans insist on establishing foothold bases in the Central Asian republics and - of course - humiliating the Christian Serbs to the advantage of the duplicitous Albanians? [And why, for that matter, is there an immense U.S. case in Kosova, Camp Bondsteel? It's almost unheard-of even by well-informed Westerners but it's there all right. Check it out on the 'net!]
American-funded NGOs prompted and financed "pro-Western" and "pro-democratic" upheavals in Ukraine and Georgia. Disappointingly for the adept and cunning dollar-funded string-pullers, they were thwarted in Belarus.
If I were a Russki, whether Left, Right, Centre or anything else, I'd have been driven hopping mad by a fraction of these deliberate provocations. No wonder Russian warships are in the Caribbean again!
Report this comment
Andre Hattingh
December 31st, 2008 7:06amLike all his predecessors - a mediocrity who mistook rigour for vigour.
Report this comment