The past half-century has seen the most astonishing concentration of scientific discoveries in history. In physical terms, from the Big Bang to the Double Helix, our understanding of the universe, of life and ourselves has been extended with an intensity and on a scale that may never be repeated. And in terms of cracking the riddle of what allows ourselves and all other species to function, no discoveries held more promise than the unravelling of the genetic code which drives all life and of those workings of the human brain uncovered by neuroscience. But in each case, as Dr James Le Fanu shows in his enthralling book, these have brought us up against a dead end.
Having decoded the genome which we imagined might help to explain, inter alia, why we are different from monkeys, mice and sea urchins, we make the startling discovery that genetically we are all but identical. So what is it that determines that much the same genetic coding can produce such an infinite variety of life forms? Clearly there is some other hugely important factor at work here, some ‘formative impulse’ which science has not yet begun to comprehend.
Similarly the more our scanners have been able to tell us about the operations and structures of the human brain, the more it becomes clear that we cannot even fully understand how it works physically, let alone how it gives rise to all that non-material dimension of ‘mind’ which encompasses almost everything of who we are and how we think, feel and behave.
As a medical doctor, Le Fanu argues that what we have been seeing here is the culmination of a process which has for so long driven our attempts to explain who we are and how we came to be on this earth in purely material terms. The watershed moment in this story was the publication, in 1859, of The Origin of Species, in which Charles Darwin laid out his thesis that the evolution of life could be explained solely by the process of natural selection, whereby an infinite series of minute variations gradually turned one form of life into another.
The greatest stumbling block to this argument was that evolution has repeatedly taken place in leaps forward so sudden and so complex that they could not possibly have been accounted for by the gradual process he suggested — the ‘Cambrian explosion’ of new life forms, the complexities of the eye, the post-Cretaceous explosion of mammals. Again and again some new development emerged which required a whole mass of interdependent changes to take place simultaneously, such as the transformation of reptiles into feathered, hollow-boned and warm-blooded birds.



Comments
ritalove
April 10th, 2009 11:22amMy new friend ,
i am well pleased to contact you after going through your
profile on my search for genuine relationship at(www.spectator.co.uk) i will
like to be your good friend, please contact me with this
idd (ritakhal54@yahoo.co.uk) i am waiting for your reply soon,
rita
Report this comment
Steve
February 26th, 2009 9:07pmThis book is a lame "god of the gaps" argument that implies (wrongly) that ignorance and mystery are better than knowledge. Don't waste your cash, it will be in the charity shops before long.
Report this comment
A Mills
February 9th, 2009 10:47amMore ID crap from likes of CB; the "sudden leap forward” of the Cambrian Explosion is estimated to have taken at least 70 million years, and the point about the supposed complexity of the eye is so tired and has been so thoroughly refuted that i can hardly believe that you are so lazy as to drag this up.
You are getting to be so utterly predictable and boring.
Report this comment
Simon
February 8th, 2009 11:05amOh dear,
Anyone who sees intelligent design here, is as blinkered as Le Fanu points out.
Report this comment
Rider1
February 2nd, 2009 6:33amUm, the Cambrian Explosion took a couple of million years - your comments sound like a recent statement made by an ID exponent 'if evolution takes so long why can't I see things evolving'. I'm surprised the Spectator allowed elements of creationism beliefs to slip into a review.
Report this comment
Caymen Paolo Diceda
February 2nd, 2009 4:44amI will certainly read the book, but the review seems to be the usual apology for weak thinking intelligent designers.
Report this comment
lauriemacdonell-sanchez
January 31st, 2009 9:19amExcellent book--hopefully the readership will not be too narrow. Maybe sufficient numbers of opinion-makers will read it & have a change of heart & mindset & transmit the message to the general public. One thing, though: Human genome-sequencing is still incomplete, and who knows how long it will take for man to complete the next big project --tracking the expression proteins, which will again put the currently impossible within man's reach. This is after all part of Le Fanu's message, along with his insight into the progress-crippling "'illusion of knowledge'" prevalent among most academics & many scientists & their refusal to recognize -- even in themselves -- the majesty & mystery of the human mind & soul. But the finest intellects always do seek out the divine in their mature years.
Report this comment