As even Darwin himself acknowledged, these jumps in the story might have seemed to render his thesis ‘absurd’. He might therefore have hypothesised that some other critically important factor seemed to be at work, some ‘organising power’ which had allowed these otherwise inexplicable leaps to take place. But so possessed was he by the elegant simplicity of his theory that, waving such thoughts aside, he made a leap of faith that it must be right, regardless of the evidence — and in the increasingly materialistic mid-19th century, his thesis was an idea whose time had come. Thus has his belief that life evolved solely through a material process continued to possess the minds of scientists to this day.
What is psychologically fascinating about the mindset of the Darwinians is their inability to recognise just how much they do not know. As Le Fanu observes in a comment which might have served as an epigraph to his book, ‘the greatest obstacle to scientific progress is not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge’. Blinkered in their vision, armoured in the certainty that they have all the answers when they so obviously don’t, neo-Darwinians such as Richard Dawkins rest their beliefs just as much on an unscientific leap of faith as the ‘Creationists’ they so fanatically affect to despise.
But the significance of what has happened in recent years, Le Fanu suggests, is that it has shown us where this fatally limited vision has led us to. In terms of giving us any deeper understanding of who we really are, the deciphering of the genome and of the neural pathways of the brain, astonishing achievements though they may be in themselves, have both turned out to be blind alleys. Above all they have brought home to us just how much has been shut out by that reductionist perversion of science which seeks significance only in the material world.
What Le Fanu calls for is a ‘paradigm shift’, where scientific enquiry can once again be liberated to put us back in touch with so much of what makes us fully human — with the workings not just of the brain but of the mind, with that spiritual sense of awe at the wondrously constructed unity of nature which was never better exemplified than in Isaac Newton, the greatest physical scientist who ever lived. One of the glories of Le Fanu’s scientifically erudite and beautifully written book is that such a sense of wonder is evident on every page, even as he lucidly analyses the limitations of that narrow intellectual prison in which science has languished too long.





Comments
ritalove
April 10th, 2009 11:22amMy new friend ,
i am well pleased to contact you after going through your
profile on my search for genuine relationship at(www.spectator.co.uk) i will
like to be your good friend, please contact me with this
idd (ritakhal54@yahoo.co.uk) i am waiting for your reply soon,
rita
Report this comment
Steve
February 26th, 2009 9:07pmThis book is a lame "god of the gaps" argument that implies (wrongly) that ignorance and mystery are better than knowledge. Don't waste your cash, it will be in the charity shops before long.
Report this comment
A Mills
February 9th, 2009 10:47amMore ID crap from likes of CB; the "sudden leap forward” of the Cambrian Explosion is estimated to have taken at least 70 million years, and the point about the supposed complexity of the eye is so tired and has been so thoroughly refuted that i can hardly believe that you are so lazy as to drag this up.
You are getting to be so utterly predictable and boring.
Report this comment
Simon
February 8th, 2009 11:05amOh dear,
Anyone who sees intelligent design here, is as blinkered as Le Fanu points out.
Report this comment
Rider1
February 2nd, 2009 6:33amUm, the Cambrian Explosion took a couple of million years - your comments sound like a recent statement made by an ID exponent 'if evolution takes so long why can't I see things evolving'. I'm surprised the Spectator allowed elements of creationism beliefs to slip into a review.
Report this comment
Caymen Paolo Diceda
February 2nd, 2009 4:44amI will certainly read the book, but the review seems to be the usual apology for weak thinking intelligent designers.
Report this comment
lauriemacdonell-sanchez
January 31st, 2009 9:19amExcellent book--hopefully the readership will not be too narrow. Maybe sufficient numbers of opinion-makers will read it & have a change of heart & mindset & transmit the message to the general public. One thing, though: Human genome-sequencing is still incomplete, and who knows how long it will take for man to complete the next big project --tracking the expression proteins, which will again put the currently impossible within man's reach. This is after all part of Le Fanu's message, along with his insight into the progress-crippling "'illusion of knowledge'" prevalent among most academics & many scientists & their refusal to recognize -- even in themselves -- the majesty & mystery of the human mind & soul. But the finest intellects always do seek out the divine in their mature years.
Report this comment