Ori Brafman is a businessman, Rom a practising psychologist, and it is precisely at the intersection of management and medicine that this thinking is born. For the mind-doctor as much as the MBA, life is a question of efficiency. One turns maladjusted individuals into productive workers; the other turns raw materials into final products. They share a conviction that the world is measurable, definable, manageable. They also share a disregard for ultimate goals, concerning themselves only with technique: the ‘how’, not the ‘why’.
Chapter Five of Sway describes an experiment which asked a group of men to cross one of two bridges, then measured their responses to the female research assistant waiting for them at the end. The men who crossed the shaky rope bridge found her much more attractive than those who strolled across the stable wooden one. It is a cute experiment, and the Brafmans use it neatly to show how anxiety alters our mindset. But the moment they start talking about messy old feelings, their patter sounds very hollow.
Behavioural economics is meant to offer a more realistic picture of human life. But here, as so often, emotions are merely being weighed — by crude neurophysiology, most flagrantly — to be fitted into another equation. ‘We are all more likely to fall in love when we feel in danger’, the back of Sway tells us. Aah — so that’s how it works.
Reading the section about the bridges, one could easily get the impression that the Brafmans view love as nothing more than an unfortunate irrationality, an impediment to effective economic functioning. But, frankly, I doubt they have thought about it that much. They happily take it for granted that efficiency is always good — and that behavioural biases like ‘excessive commitment’ are things we would all be better off without.
Sway claims to bring a new dimension to ‘traditional economic theory’ (traditional, tellingly, used as a synonym for outdated). But this is more of the same. The defects of the old model are obvious, and tidily accounted for here. The real question, the question we are all asking now, is glaringly absent. Wondering what exactly economic activity is for? Don’t expect this book to tell you.





Comments
ritalove
April 10th, 2009 11:21amMy new friend ,
i am well pleased to contact you after going through your
profile on my search for genuine relationship at(www.spectator.co.uk) i will
like to be your good friend, please contact me with this
idd (ritakhal54@yahoo.co.uk) i am waiting for your reply soon,
rita
Report this comment
Ben
February 13th, 2009 8:10pm"...irrational equals bad, rational good...."
This is a standard asssumption in contemporary discourse. The idea that we can consciously make rational decisions and overcome whatever it is that our irrational unconscious prefers is very well entrenched, and rarely challenged. Furthermore, questioning whether any decision we make can possibly be entirely rational is considered to be in bad taste.
Sadly, all the wisdom and insight that Freud brought to this matter has been discarded and forgotten, and we have regressed intellectually as a consequence.
Report this comment