To say that this first volume of Samuel Beckett’s collected letters is a puzzle and a disappointment is to suggest that one might have had specific expectations of it. Where did this cryptic and poetic writer come from? What did so very affectless an author sound like when he was talking in his own voice to his intimates? And, considering the remote relationship most of his writing bears to the world, how did he look at it? Added to this specific anticipation is the knowledge that Beckett, in tthe Thirties, had an exceptionally interesting life. He was an intimate of the Joyce household, trusted by all members of it. He played an important role in the composition and development of Finnegans Wake. He travelled in Germany in the historically crucial years of 1937 and 1938; his subsequent war record in the French Resistance might lead one to suppose that he would have something decisive to say about the Third Reich on the ground. And, perhaps quite trivially but certainly of human interest, he was a surprisingly accomplished cricketer — famously the only Nobel prize-winner to appear in Wisden. The letters, so far, disappoint on every one of these grounds. There is only one letter to Joyce here, a formal and respectful one of no great interest. There are only passing references to Finnegans Wake, and to the difficulties the Joyce family faced in the 1930s, particularly concerning Lucia Joyce’s mental illness. Amazingly, the detailed letters relating to his German travels are almost entirely about paintings he has seen — often acute comments, but the silence on other subjects is positively deafening. And there is nothing whatsoever about cricket.





Comments
ritalove
April 10th, 2009 11:18amMy new friend ,
i am well pleased to contact you after going through your
profile on my search for genuine relationship at(www.spectator.co.uk) i will
like to be your good friend, please contact me with this
idd (ritakhal54@yahoo.co.uk) i am waiting for your reply soon,
rita
Report this comment
KKovacheva
March 26th, 2009 9:42pmWatching Mr Hensher, for whom “gossip” appears synonymous with “healthy human interest”, and for whom the lack of the former implies the lack of the latter, is rather like watching a sad and overweight buffoon attempt to keep pace with a sprinter. Readers may judge the quality of his review from the quality of his reading of the very first letters in the volume: Hensher finds of a single letter to Joyce; in fact, the first two letters in the volume are to Joyce! How could one so slapdash and careless hope to comprehend the mind and thought of a genius? More to the point, why should he presume to dare?
Report this comment
Helga Mitchell
March 1st, 2009 10:01amHow can I contact Philip Hensher? I wish to tell him how much I enjoyed The Northern Clemency.
Report this comment