How should ancient Roman history be written? Gibbon larded his account with ironic elegance. Echoing Tacitus’ epigrammatic sarcasm, he made ponderously light of the vanities and savagery of imperial rule. Yet the Latinate charm of his prose implied wry nostalgia, not only for the age of the Antonines, but also for the whole myth of Roman grandeur. In my undergraduate day, Professor F. E. Adcock continued to lisp in Tacitean epigrams, but the great modern iconoclast was Ronald Syme. A New Zealander whose The Roman Revolution cut the classy crap, Syme denounced Augustus and his family as proto-mafiosi who had taken over Rome in what François Mitterrand later called (when speaking of de Gaulle’s Fifth Republic) ‘le coup d’état permanent’.



Comments
Chris Franklin
January 11th, 2008 12:57pmpompous, or what?
Report this comment
Kate
December 22nd, 2007 2:02pmAt least Mary Beard is legible and vaguely coherent.
Report this comment
Terry Collmann
November 22nd, 2007 6:08pmSaucer of milk for Mr Raphael ...
Report this comment