When the college authorities told him to remove the offending blog, lest it be picked up by the media and damage his department, he appealed to the director of the LSE, Sir Howard Davies, who replied, ‘The issue here is not a policy on blogging, it is whether a colleague can publicly abuse his employer and his colleagues without consequences.’ The papers did pick up the row, and eventually Ringmar had to go.
Ringmar whines that his right to free speech was being trampled on, he was being censored and intimidated. But these were not his only blogging indiscretions. In his very first blogs, he says, he ‘made up a story about Sir Howard Davies, a few choirboys and the Catholic Church. None of it was true of course.’ What was true was an admission he also posted online: ‘I never actually read Being and Time, you know, I only pretended to.’ The book in question is Martin Heidegger’s most important work, about which he was supposed to have taught his pupils. Naturally Ringmar thinks that ‘such admissions are surely perfectly innocent’, as if it was the admission, not the original deception that people disliked.
Ringmar is not the first person to lose his job because of what he wrote on his blog. There is a word for it — being dooced. Someone called Heather Armstrong coined it in 2002, when she was sacked for writing about work and colleagues on her blog, Dooce.com. Since then she hasn’t looked back. Her blog is badly written, unfunny and embarrassing, with pictures of her daughter and her dog in a wig, but as she points out,
Perhaps Ringmar, who now lives in Taiwan, might find similar joy, but it does not alter the fact that blogs, with or without ads, are no more than a means of communication. Why should you think it all right to write, ‘The boss is a bastard’ on your blog, if you hesitate to shout it outside his office door? However, Ringmar takes self-righteousness to extremes, arguing that a girlfriend should not complain if a blog reveals that she has a sexually transmitted disease.




Comments
Michael Halberstam
July 22nd, 2008 11:27pmChrisopher Howse clearly has not read Martin Heidegger or the extant secondary literature. My friend Erik's comment that he never read Heidegger, but only pretended to, is a wry and witty comment on much of the Heidegger industry. Frankly, Heidegger's Being and Time is not worth reading in English, neither in the old, nor the new translation. It is mere ghibberish. Instead, I would recommend Dana Villa's book on Arendt and/or Ruediger Safranski's excellent philosophical Heidegger biography to anyone who would care to understand the importance of Heidegger's work but does not read German and has not studied Greek culture and certain arcane histories of western Philosophy for the better part of his or her life. Not having spoken with my friend Erik in many years, but knowing his voracious appetite for digesting the best thinkers in a whole range of disciplines (and languages), I surmise that this is likely the view that he was expressing -- only he is so much funnier than I am. Incidentally, when one of my former students sought me out last year to ask whether he should go to Germany to study Heidegger, I suggested he would likely be better served by seeking out Heidegger experts at Yale and other U.S. institutions as well as the support that such institutions now offer their graduate students (apparently at least four years of full funding for anyone admitted) -- which opinion he apparently confirmed with a respected scholar in Germany whom I recommended he check with for a second opinion. Whatever his purported offenses against the prevailing mores at L.S.E., this episode shows that Erik cares a lot about students and the truth and has not lost his sense of humor and outrage -- qualities that L.S.E. apparently did not appreciate. Too bad for L.S.E. and its students.
Report this comment
Erik Ringmar
January 14th, 2008 5:21amHi Chris, thanks for the review. My blog had 97,546 visitors in a year. I think that's pretty good. Btw, I don't advocate letting the world know about your ex girlfriends STD, but I don't think there is a way of stopping people who want to spread such information. The point is, we have to get used to living in a world were nothing much is kept secret for very long. Btw, Taiwan is great. I had roast duck for lunch and the weather is gorgeous. yours, Erik
Report this comment
Steve Mitchelmore
January 12th, 2008 9:56pm"for those who take no cognisance of such things ... blogs are no more than diaries" Christopher Howse and the person who wrote "By so many, to so few" should do some research. Blogs can be, and are, more than diaries, and many are read by many more each day than will ever witness the ignorance on display here. For example, blogs that review books and discuss literature in general: http://www.britlitblogs.com/
Report this comment