Although bloggers are hypnotised into an almost erotic relationship with their own blogs, technically there is nothing about blogs that makes bloggers foolish, repellent and egotistical. Blogs merely allow us to read their pitiful outpourings, if we want to, which on the whole we do not. Blogging is like modern poetry, more people write it than want to read it. The world had 70 million bloggers last April, and the number may have doubled since then. Britain now has four million bloggers. Most blogs are read by fewer than 10 people a day. Only 10 per cent have more than 100 hits a day. You’d reach a wider audience if you photocopied a few sheets of paper and left them on the Underground.
Yet some blogs, like some poems, reach many thousands. It helps to find a niche and say something expert. In The Bookaholics’ Guide to Book Blogs, two people from the publishers Marion Boyars explain why blogs have influence on book buyers, and thus on publishers. It boils down to bloggers’ resemblance to columnists and critics in weekly publications: the good ones gain a following. Already publishers are sending review copies to some bloggers.
There is a sort of irony in so many books coming out about the internet, which is the medium expected to destroy them. Certainly when a light, eye-friendly electronic reading screen is cheaply available, books and newspapers will really be challenged. But we must bear in mind that it will cost money in future to retrieve information online, and that there is also a danger of someone (commercially or politically) cutting off supplies.
The connections between popular music and the internet are the lianas upon which David Jennings swings through the cyber jungle in Net, Blogs and Rock’n’Roll. Since music is widely consumed online, often coupled with video, the internet seems more hospitable to it than to written news and literature. Jennings is far more optimistic than commentators like Andrew Keen (author of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture and Assaulting our Economy), who argued earlier this year that music online means idiocy, degradation and solipsism.
Jennings, a full-time creature of the net, does not deny the popular delusions and madness of crowds that give some music releases undeserved success, but he comes up on page 64 with a practicable scheme for aggregating trusted criticism that should make him money, if someone takes him up on it.


Comments
Michael Halberstam
July 22nd, 2008 11:27pmChrisopher Howse clearly has not read Martin Heidegger or the extant secondary literature. My friend Erik's comment that he never read Heidegger, but only pretended to, is a wry and witty comment on much of the Heidegger industry. Frankly, Heidegger's Being and Time is not worth reading in English, neither in the old, nor the new translation. It is mere ghibberish. Instead, I would recommend Dana Villa's book on Arendt and/or Ruediger Safranski's excellent philosophical Heidegger biography to anyone who would care to understand the importance of Heidegger's work but does not read German and has not studied Greek culture and certain arcane histories of western Philosophy for the better part of his or her life. Not having spoken with my friend Erik in many years, but knowing his voracious appetite for digesting the best thinkers in a whole range of disciplines (and languages), I surmise that this is likely the view that he was expressing -- only he is so much funnier than I am. Incidentally, when one of my former students sought me out last year to ask whether he should go to Germany to study Heidegger, I suggested he would likely be better served by seeking out Heidegger experts at Yale and other U.S. institutions as well as the support that such institutions now offer their graduate students (apparently at least four years of full funding for anyone admitted) -- which opinion he apparently confirmed with a respected scholar in Germany whom I recommended he check with for a second opinion. Whatever his purported offenses against the prevailing mores at L.S.E., this episode shows that Erik cares a lot about students and the truth and has not lost his sense of humor and outrage -- qualities that L.S.E. apparently did not appreciate. Too bad for L.S.E. and its students.
Report this comment
Erik Ringmar
January 14th, 2008 5:21amHi Chris, thanks for the review. My blog had 97,546 visitors in a year. I think that's pretty good. Btw, I don't advocate letting the world know about your ex girlfriends STD, but I don't think there is a way of stopping people who want to spread such information. The point is, we have to get used to living in a world were nothing much is kept secret for very long. Btw, Taiwan is great. I had roast duck for lunch and the weather is gorgeous. yours, Erik
Report this comment
Steve Mitchelmore
January 12th, 2008 9:56pm"for those who take no cognisance of such things ... blogs are no more than diaries" Christopher Howse and the person who wrote "By so many, to so few" should do some research. Blogs can be, and are, more than diaries, and many are read by many more each day than will ever witness the ignorance on display here. For example, blogs that review books and discuss literature in general: http://www.britlitblogs.com/
Report this comment