Of course, it is difficult, and often emerges here in slightly George Steinerish statements of the impossibility of the imaginative exercise. In one piece, Amis narrates the events of an abandoned novella about an Islamist in some detail, and one suddenly realises that the narrative wasn’t abandoned; it’s being told here and now, in an unorthodox narrative mode. Evocations of the unimaginable are, too, exercises in the imagined. On thinking of being a passenger on one of the 11 September planes, ‘It is hard to defend your imagination from such a reality’; or, again:
Whenever that sense of heavy incredulity seems about to dissipate, I still find, an emergent detail will eagerly replenish it … what was it like to be a passenger on that plane? What was it like to see it coming towards you?
The controversy raised by Amis’s views on religion as specifically embodied by Islamists is an empty one. He will tell you that his loathing is limited to Islamists, not even to Islam and certainly not to the ethnic groups concerned. The point, I think, is demonstrated, and the openness with which he has been willing to think out loud could usefully be emulated by political figures, addicted as they are to weasel words and double talk. I have to say that from non-practising Muslims I’ve heard language and opinions on Islamists which are far less temperate than anything Amis uses. In comparison to the private expressions of voices of modernity within Muslim societies, Amis is almost exaggeratedly respectful.
The two short stories are on compelling subjects, which ultimately defeat Amis’s imagination; one is narrated by one of the numerous ‘doubles’ which Saddam and his family employed for safety’s sake, the other the narration of the last days of 11 September terrorist, Muhammad Atta. He does his best with the material; but the material is too grave, and it just sits there, somewhat inertly.
Buy the book, however, for, among other things, what must be regarded as an extraordinary classic of political reportage, an extended interview with Tony Blair in his last days in office. Amis conveys in astonishing style the dizzying constant realisations of sheer power; he exactly captures the grand dullness surrounding the absurdly matey posturing of its central figure. It reads almost like a dream of wish-fulfilment, so exactly realised is the character of Blair. Somehow, too, Amis’s own political positions, which can often be described as those of a clever undergraduate, don’t diminish the allure of the portrait but enhance it:
‘German is obsessed by transparency,’ I had said to him. ‘Some think it’s because what it fears most is itself.’
‘That view’s old-fashioned,’ said Blair.
As indeed it is. But what the author of Dead Babies is, rather unexpectedly, turning into, is an old-fashioned defender of truth, beauty and the values of literature against the massing dark. There is something noble about this book, and even when it is wrong it is never deplorable.



Comments
ian skidmore
January 21st, 2008 8:30amOn the basis of your selections of Amis's prose, I cannot think of a literate window cleaner ( my own was a B .A.) or indeed an illiterate one who could not give a more cogent explanation for his inability to believe. I am not a believer myself, but I much prefer to read St Mark as literature rather than Mr Amis who it seems to me has never exhibited any great talet in that direction. Though terribly good at Being a Novelist, which is not at all the ame thing.
Report this comment
DBH
January 19th, 2008 11:26pmShouldn't a "great novelist" have produced at least one great novel? Or perhaps a very good one? Not to seem naive, but how does Martin Amis--whose ambition to measure up to Bellow or Nabokov has so far got him about to the level of a somewhat more pretentious Stephen King--merit this sort of praise? Of course, perhaps the answer lies in Hensher's own prose, which seems (shall we say?) a little bit shapeless. Maybe he really believes that Amis's middle-brow drivel is genuinely great literature.
Report this comment
daragh nugent
January 19th, 2008 9:56pmThe late and most lamented Sir Kingsley also commented that he did not wish his grandchildren to grow up in a world "where religious belief was impossible". "It's more that I hate Him, really", is not an irrelegious comment.
Report this comment
daragh nugent
January 19th, 2008 9:49pmdrivel. The late and most lamented Sir Kingsley also commented that he did not wish his grandchildren to grow up in a world "where religious belief was impossible". "It's more that I hate Him, really", is not an irrelegious comment.
Report this comment
JOhn HOlliday
January 19th, 2008 12:12pm"Nice idea, but people like me or Amis for whom these things are not just sufficient but boundlessly sufficient are always going to be the targets of fervent believers. I love the image, and the hope, but you can’t formulate it without an immediate sense of its tragic vulnerability" COuld we have an English translation please?
Report this comment
Anmol Dogra
January 18th, 2008 7:24pmWriters like Martin Amis forget that the Bible is not just literature.It has an extra dimension as well.It is literature infused with the spirit of God.Where are in literature the beatitudes,the Lord's prayer,the sermon on the mount and crucifixion? If these have no meaning for him,he is entitled to his belief.But he can't equate the Bible with mere literature.
Report this comment
Wylie Marshall
January 18th, 2008 4:46pmThis article just rambled on and on. Didn't every say anything. Where's the beef?
Report this comment
Wylie Marshall
January 18th, 2008 4:46pmThis article just rambled on and on. Didn't every say anything.
Report this comment