Ultimately Smuts had to agree that the demands of the world’s postwar electorates could not be ignored. But he looked back with learned nostalgia to the irenic Congress of Vienna, where the peace of Europe had been secured for almost a century after the defeat of Napoleon. Some might see his eventual acquiescence in the harsh terms of his colleagues as an act of cowardice, but Lentin rightly notes that to have refused his signature would have jeopardised the quasi-independent status of his country as a Dominion of the British Empire.
Smuts’ sympathy for the sufferings of the Germans at Versailles did not turn him into an appeaser of Hitler, as was the case with many who shared his views in 1919. Indeed, as a field marshal in the British army, he was an important confidant of Churchill, who described his abilities in glowing terms. The only cloud that hangs over his legacy is the issue of apartheid, which began under the regime of his successor, Daniel-François Malan, whose National Party defeated Smuts in the 1948 general election. Two years later Smuts was dead.
What went wrong? This is a question that Lentin is perhaps wise not to delve into too deeply, partly because to do so would be like looking through a telescope from the wrong end. Smuts’ views on race were little different from those of the educated elites who ruled the empire from London; detestable from a modern perspective, but a long way short of the institutionalised segregation and open discrimination that came after. Lentin is refreshingly unorthodox when he postulates the likelihood of his subject ‘warming to Nelson Mandela as a kindred spirit’. Both advocated ‘a time for the healing of the wounds’, as the latter declared in his inaugural speech as President in 1994.
As with the other biographies so far to appear in the series, General Smuts is a fast-paced and highly intelligent work, packed with illuminating quotations. The author brings to the table the gleanings of a lifetime’s research on men such as David Lloyd George and Woodrow Wilson, whom he clearly holds accountable for much of the later history of the 20th century. Whether readers choose to go all the way with him or not, his book will remind them that not all politicians at Versailles were monsters, nor is democracy necessarily the best means of resolving a world crisis. The Conference was, in Churchill’s words, ‘a turbulent collision of embarrassed demagogues’.
Comments
There are currently no comments for this article.