This week’s bookbencher is Gloria De Piero, the Labour MP for Ashfield. She has a soft spot for Wuthering Heights and Karl Marx’s Das Kapital.
Which book's on your bedside table at the moment?
Race of a Lifetime. I'm half way through it. It's a behind the scenes tale of the last Presidential race. It has real fly on the wall stuff on Barack and Michelle, Hillary and Bill, John and Elizabeth Edwards and John and Cindy McCain. It covers the highs and the lows of their campaigns as well as their personalities, their foibles, their strengths and the tensions between their staff. It's written by two US journos so it zips along and is really good fun to read.
Which book would you read to your children?
I don't have children. My sister in law has 2 young boys who talk about Moshi Monsters a lot. Do they do books?
Which literary character would you most like to be?
DCI Jane Tennison from Lynda La Plante's Prime Suspect. Ballsy, successful, beautiful and a bit flawed too.
Which book do you think best sums up 'now'?
A Policy Network pamphlet written by the best thinkers from the Left around the World. It contains essays which map out some solutions to the global financial crisis. There's exclusive polling in
there too. It’s called 'Priorities for a New Political Economy: Memos to the
Left', and even though It was published over a year ago it's still the best I've read.
What was the last novel you read?
I read a Ruth Rendell called The Bridesmaid over
Christmas. The blurb said it’s probably her best book, but I think Thirteen Steps Down is much creepier and much better.
Which book would you most recommend?
You have to read Andrew Young's The
Politician. No really, you have to. I couldn't put it down. Where do I start? It’s written by the trusted, long suffering aide Andrew Young who does everything for wannabe President
John Edwards, and that ultimately means agreeing to take the flak for his illegitimate love child during his campaign to be the Democrat nominee. Why did Young agree to say he was the father? Why
on earth did John Edwards think he could get away with it and how the hell could he betray his terminally ill wife? It doesn't just cover a massive news story, it also tracks Edward's decade long
positioning as champion of the poor, though Young recalls he didn't seem to like them much. Tina Brown says it’s like a Hitchcock thriller; she's right: it's as compelling as it is
disturbing.
Given enough time, which book would you like to study deeply?
Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women, said to be the first feminist book. I studied her thoughts at Uni but never read the original text.
Which books do you plan to read next?
The Hacienda: How Not To Run a Club, by Peter
Hook. I've just read Shaun Ryder's autobiography. He was in the Happy Mondays, a massive Manchester band in the early 90's, and last year he was runner up in I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of
Here. He went to hell and back as a pop star. To say he lived to excess is an understatement. As someone who grew up in the north of England, it gave us pride to have the best bands, the best
clubs and even lead the way in fashion in the early 90's. The Hacienda was absolutely central to that. I wasn't cool enough to have actually gone there, though.
If the British Library was on fire and you could only save three books, which ones would you take?
Karl Marx's work had a huge impact on me as a teenager. The World has changed, politics has changed and I've changed, but his ideas have made such an impact on the world that I've decided to save Das Kapital which he wrote in the British Library. Ideas still matter.
DH Lawrence's Women in Love. Lawrence was born in Eastwood, which is the community I represent. God forbid the burning down of the British Library; but if the worst happens, come to Eastwood and see the copy of Lady Chatterley's Lover, his most famous and controversial book, that was used in court at the famous obscenity trial in 1960, at our DH Lawrence Birthplace museum and Heritage centre.
Wuthering Heights, in my view the greatest love story ever. My mate Lindsey and I read it on hols in Corfu straight after we'd done our A levels.




Comments
Brendan Wignall
February 1st, 2012 11:22pmOh for goodness' sake: Wuthering Heights is not a 'love story'. Even the Guardian (not normally known for its intelligence) has dealt with this absurd claim: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/aug/11/comment.bookscomment.
I will, of course, wash my hands after pasting that link.
Report this comment
Simon Stephenson.
January 29th, 2012 3:35pmNicholas : 12.34pm
Why polarisation? Because adversarial politics, combined with unreason, dishonesty and cheating, leads to arguments being pitched from the extremities rather than the centre. As both sides grow to realise that reasoned argument's got no chance, they focus on not losing - not conceding an inch - rather than on trying to reach an accommodation with those who hold different points of view.
It's not all about compromise, but neither is it all about defending positions that are opinions, not certainties. But the holding of opinions as certainties is where our politics seems to be moving.
Report this comment
Simon Stephenson.
January 29th, 2012 3:15pmKennybhoy : 2.24pm
"What do you mean by "recently"?"
Since Murdoch indoctrinated the masses that tabloid simplisticism was the essence of how a successful society should be run.
Report this comment
Kennybhoy
January 29th, 2012 2:24pmSimon Stephenson wrote:
"But we seem recently to have fallen into the trap of thinking that improvement is just about bettering single consequences, and that other, more unwelcome ramifications are no more than potential embarrassments which don't need to be included in the quantification."
Indeed. Appreciation of this spillikins effect is the basis of much popular conservatism.
What do you mean by "recently"?
Report this comment
yohodi
January 29th, 2012 12:56pmGloria de/del Piero
There...thats says it all..
Report this comment
Nicholas
January 29th, 2012 12:34pmWhy "complacency" vs "discontent"? Why is it that the choices are always polarised and then demonised from each perspective? I don't believe that conservatism is "complacency" but rather seeking to conserve that which is proven, which works. Or, alternatively, not throwing the baby out with the bathwater - or "of it ain't broke don't fix it".
Report this comment
David L
January 29th, 2012 12:13pmAustin Barry @1.23; some good news. Last week I donated some books to the Regents Canal Book Barge. The consignment included several Orwell paperbacks. The chap from the barge said that Orwell books fly off the shelves. So obviously the message is getting through to some people.
Report this comment
Simon Stephenson.
January 29th, 2012 12:04pmNicholas : 11.27am
I'm a radical to the extent that I believe complacency to be as big a danger to society as discontent. No situation is unimprovable, and if we wish to keep pace with other nations we need to recognise this. But we seem recently to have fallen into the trap of thinking that improvement is just about bettering single consequences, and that other, more unwelcome ramifications are no more than potential embarrassments which don't need to be included in the quantification.
Adversarial politics doesn't really work when the contestants cheat to win - and knowingly pretending that secondary consequences are irrelevant is intellectual cheating.
Report this comment
Simon Stephenson.
January 29th, 2012 11:32amde Piero should be, I believe, del Piero.
Report this comment
Kennybhoy
January 29th, 2012 11:29am"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
H.L. Mencken
Report this comment