Monday, 17th October 2011
Be honest, how many times have you used your local library in the past year? If you live in Kensal Rise, the answer is “not enough”. Before it was locked up last week, after the High
Court overturned a last-ditch appeal by campaigners, its pretty Victorian library had been getting only 850 visits a week.
With each of these visits costing £4, Brent Council decided this wasn’t sustainable. Kensal, along with five other “under-performing” libraries, would be closed, with some
of the £1 million saved going towards the borough’s six remaining libraries. There are also plans underfoot to build a new “super library” near Wembley stadium.
Naturally, the Labour council have been portrayed as greedy philistines, using Tory cuts as an excuse to save money. There’s no question the library closures have been badly managed, both in
PR terms (the council leader allegedly told people to “buy their books from a supermarket”) and logistically (one of the surviving libraries is about to close for refurbishment for a
year).
It’s not as simple as that, however. Of course cutting costs is a big priority: Brent has been ordered to save £41.7 million this year. But while the shadow of the chancellor’s
axe has certainly added to the urgency of these closures, Brent has been dying to overhaul its libraries for years.
Reducing library closures to a matter of short-term economies distracts from the real debates we need to be having: what are libraries for, and — if we’re all agreed they’re worth
keeping — how we can get more people to use them?
Clearly, a library getting hundreds of thousands of visitors a year is going to be in a safer position than one getting tens of thousands. The biggest shortcoming of the Brent library campaigners,
as well as an unhelpful “all or nothing” approach, has been a failure to appeal to anyone who wasn’t already a library user.
How many people listening to Zadie Smith’s speech in a trendy Kensal Rise bar had never set foot in a library before? Did Alan Bennett think a London Review of Books essay would inspire
thousands to take out library membership?
A lot of high-profile library supporters base their arguments on nostalgia: that if it weren’t for libraries rescuing them from impoverished childhoods, they wouldn’t be the hugely
successful authors they are today. But all this harking after a golden age undermines the
many exciting developments on the library front.
One of the main reasons people give for not using libraries is "they never have
what I want". If, however, you’re lucky enough to live in one of the London boroughs (including Brent) that have pooled their stock into the London Libraries Consortium you no longer have an excuse. Your library card gives you access to six million free books, a surprising proportion of which have
just been published, all available to reserve and renew online. It’s a shame librarians don’t publicise it more.
Adult library usage, though falling nationally, is also picking up in parts of London. A few years ago, Tower Hamlets’ libraries rebranded themselves as Idea Stores. If you’re prepared to look past the dubious name, the stats are very promising. The flagship branch in Whitechapel is getting 14,000 visits a week and Tower Hamlets' issues have increased by 20 per cent since the rebranding. A lot of this is down to bright new buildings and shiny new books.
Another London borough, Hillingdon, is halfway through renovating its 17 libraries. One of them even has a Starbucks, which makes the branch about £7,000 a year. Apparently, there has been a
fifty per cent increase in visits to the refurbished branches.
Throughout the UK, library festivals and author events are thriving, thanks in part to the Reading Agency, which has been tirelessly
educating publishers that libraries — far from simply giving away books for free — can be useful, money-making partners.
Some of us need educating too. If libraries are going to survive, we need to see them as more than just a safety net for the poor, the old and the young. Like all public services, they function
best when used by everyone.
Anna Baddeley is editor of The Omnivore.
Blog Tags: Libraries , Literature , Politics
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Classic Crews: A Harry Crews Reader
To find out more about Jeremy Clarke's singular reading habits, click here.
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Ian
October 17th, 2011 7:54pm Report this commentIn actual fact, library usage is increasing. In 2006/7 there were 401m visits to the library, rising to 440m in 2009/10. In terms of librarians not promoting the service, they would love to if they could. I know of at least one authority that does not allow librarians to promote any service without clearing it with head office. Unsurprisingly, given the cuts in local government, such marketing expenditure is kept on a very tight reign. And that is before we even consider that many authorities do not allow librarians to use tools such as Facebook or Twitter to promote the service - both of which don't cost a penny aside from very limited staffing. Local councils should trust librarians and enable them to promote the service effectively. It won't prevent every library from closing, but it would certainly be a step in the right direction.
Muhammad Haque
October 17th, 2011 8:54pm Report this commentYour piece appears to be well intentioned bit it is very outdated. The reason I need a library is to find and verify the things I am already looking for. How do your libraries, pooled or not, meet my test? Not a single one. Having travelled across London for decades in search of a library fit for an ordinary person, I have decided that they abolished libraries years before the event caught the attention of trendy personnel making the routine periodic appearances in parts of the media, lamenting the demise of a supposedly once accessible institution. A library is a very private affair. It is as private as the person’s thought process. It must not be an exhibition. It cannot be done in an exhibition or in a market place, however that market is justified. It is a phenomenon that must not be vulgarised. A serious problem with the word “library” being used to refer to children’s reading facilities’ and toy rooms, is that the discussion gets derailed even before the evidence is looked at. There is a serious link between the attacks on Council-controlled facilities that have been commonly called libraries by successive UK central Goverberment-impsoed “cuts” agendas and the perceived view about what constitutes knowledge and who are the true and the most deserving claimants to access to recorded knowledge. No place symbolises the totalitarian restrictions on access to knowledge in Britain than the British Library does. It makes Romania of the pre 1989 years look positively amateurish in the craft of rationing access to knowledge and to known indices of thought! Most ordinary people seeking knowledge end up having to build their own accesses and avenues. Perhaps this deserves to be recognized and reported. Basic balance and objectivity demands that this is so.
Back to top