Andrew Kenny debunks the myth that nuclear power is inherently dangerous or bad for the environment – and hails a surge of new nuclear construction around the world
The main environmental concern about nuclear power is radiation – but it is a misplaced concern. Radiation is natural and inescapable, and all living things are bathed in natural radiation hundreds of times greater than they would absorb from a nuclear power station if they were living next to it. The National Radiological Protection Board calculates that the radiation exposure to the British public from the nuclear industry is less than 0.1 per cent of the total exposure, of which 87 per cent is from nature and about 12 per cent from healthcare. Coal power stations release more radioactivity than nuclear ones (because of the radioactive elements in the coal) but it is still utterly insignificant.
Nuclear power is not only much cheaper and more reliable than ‘renewable’ energy such as solar and wind but more environmentally benign. Because nuclear energy is so concentrated, you need few materials and a small space to provide a lot of power. Because wind and solar energy are so dilute, you need large amounts of materials and large space to provide the same power. Moreover, they are intermittent, which greatly adds to their economic and environmental costs.
In Germany, the load factor for nuclear power is 90 per cent (which means it runs at nine tenths of its capacity over a period of time) while the load factor for wind is 17 per cent. So you would need to build over five times the capacity of wind power to produce the same amount of electrical energy as nuclear power. But it’s worse than that because you can depend on nuclear power and you can never depend on wind power.
More articles from: Andrew Kenny | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
FTSE ends modestly lower as holiday companies slump
20/11/2009FTSE turns lower midday as holiday companies tumble
20/11/2009 20/11/2009 20/11/2009City pay is no side issue: it’s an affront to society
Roger BootleKeep on digging: Boris’s route to recovery
Elliot Wilson Martin Vander WeyerFor whom the tolls mean tax-free profits
Neil CollinsThere’s worse to come as we all get older
Ruth Lea
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Herbert Thornton
September 24th, 2008 1:24am Report this commentWhat a pleasure it is to read common sense about nuclear power. The faster this resource is expanded the better and the sooner we will be rid both of the pollution caused by petrol powered vehicles and other burners of oil products - not to mention our consumption of oil being the source of huge funding for people like Osama bin Laden and their bloodthirsty, medieval ambitions.
Back to top